Study on Consumer Preference for Traceable Pork With Animal Welfare Attribute

被引:7
|
作者
Chen, Mo [1 ]
Hu, Enhua [1 ]
Kuen, Lin Lin [2 ]
Wu, Linhai [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Cheng Shiu Univ, Dept Business Adm, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Business, Res Inst Food Safety Risk Management, Wuxi, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
traceable pork; animal welfare; origin; food safety; bayesian inference; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; FOOD QUALITY; BEEF; SAFETY; PERCEPTIONS; MILK;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675554
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We determined consumer preferences for traceable pork attributes in 328 consumers in Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province, China, based on a traceable pork attribute system composed of traceability, animal welfare, place of origin, and price attributes. Preference was studied using a Choice Experiment and Bayesian inference analysis. Results showed that the marginal utility of health welfare was lower than that of high-level traceability information and similar to that of place of origin but was higher than that of middle-level traceability information. A complementary relationship existed between dietary animal welfare and high-level traceability information and between health welfare and non-indigenous production. A substitution relationship existed between health welfare and indigenous production and between environmental animal welfare and non-indigenous production. The marginal utilities of health welfare and dietary welfare were higher than those of all price levels, and consumers accept a higher price as a result of increased production costs due to the inclusion of animal welfare information. Due to the harsh realities of COVID-19, China has recently approved the animal welfare attribute to be integrated into traceability market systems of new animal-derived food. The government should encourage manufacturers to produce diverse traceable animal-derived food not only to protect animal welfare and promote the construction of an ecological civilization, but also to develop new animal-derived food markets to satisfy different levels of consumer demand.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stakeholder, citizen and consumer interests in farm animal welfare
    Verbeke, W.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2009, 18 (04) : 325 - 333
  • [42] Consumer concerns for animal welfare: from psychosis to awareness
    Quintili, R
    Grifoni, G
    [J]. GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON ANIMAL WELFARE: AN OIE INITIATIVE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 93 - 96
  • [43] CONSUMER DEMAND THEORY AND THE ASSESSMENT OF ANIMAL-WELFARE
    LAWRENCE, A
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1987, 35 : 293 - 295
  • [44] Measuring the consumer benefits of improving farm animal welfare to inform welfare labelling
    Kehlbacher, A.
    Bennett, R.
    Balcombe, K.
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2012, 37 (06) : 627 - 633
  • [45] A critical reflection on intensive pork production with an emphasis on animal health and welfare
    Maes, Dominiek G. D.
    Dewulf, Jeroen
    Pineiro, Carlos
    Edwards, Sandra
    Kyriazakis, Ilias
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : S15 - S26
  • [46] Consumer preferences for pig welfare - Can the market accommodate more than one level of welfare pork?
    Denver, Sigrid
    Sandoe, Peter
    Christensen, Tove
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2017, 129 : 140 - 146
  • [47] Coherence of animal health, welfare and carcass quality in pork production chains
    Klauke, Thorsten N.
    Pineiro, Matilde
    Schulze-Geisthoevel, Sophia
    Plattes, Susanne
    Selhorst, Thomas
    Petersen, Brigitte
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 2013, 95 (03) : 704 - 711
  • [48] Assessing animal welfare: a triangulation of preference, judgement bias and other candidate welfare indicators
    Paul, Elizabeth S.
    Browne, William
    Mendl, Michael T.
    Caplen, Gina
    Trevarthen, Anna
    Held, Suzanne
    Nicol, Christine J.
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 186 : 151 - 177
  • [49] Animal welfare, consumer welfare, and competition law: The Dutch debate on he Chicken of Tomorrow
    Bos, Jacqueline M.
    van den Belt, Henk
    Feindt, Peter H.
    [J]. ANIMAL FRONTIERS, 2018, 8 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [50] Impact of satisficing behavior in online surveys on consumer preference and welfare estimates
    Gao, Zhifeng
    House, Lisa
    Bi, Xiang
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2016, 64 : 26 - 36