Experience of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation in children younger than 5 years of age

被引:15
|
作者
Amonoo-Kuofi, Kwamena [1 ]
Kelly, Andrea [2 ]
Neeff, Michel [1 ]
Brown, Colin R. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Starship Childrens Hosp, Auckland 1024, New Zealand
[2] Green Lane Hosp, Starship Childrens Hosp, Auckland 3, New Zealand
关键词
Bone-anchored hearing aids; BAHA (R) complications; Soft tissue hypertrophy; Bone hypertrophy; Osseo-integration; Pediatric; PENETRATING TITANIUM IMPLANTS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; COMPLICATIONS; BAHA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.12.033
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the practicality and benefit of Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA (R)) implantation in children younger than 5 years of age. FDA approval for use of BAHA (R) only exists for children 5 years of age and older. Their use in Australia is also rare, however their use for younger children is approved by the European Union. We wish to share our experience of implantation in an antipodean setting in this age group. Methods: Institutional board approval was obtained for this study. All children undergoing BAHA (R) implantation under 5 years old were included from our prospective database. We examined the variety of surgical techniques, (including skin grafting, limited soft tissue reduction and no soft tissue reduction), BAHA (R) implants and abutments used, and use of the new series 400 hydroxyapatite coatings. Demographic data obtained included age at surgery, follow up duration, gender, ethnicity and indication for surgery. Anonymous benefit questionnaires (Glasgow children's benefit inventory (GCBI) and parents' evaluation of aural performance of children (PEACH)) were completed online as well as a questionnaire on device use. Complications recorded included soft tissue reactions, implant loss/ removal, abutment replacement/removal. We also assessed whether patient weight, ethnicity or socioeconomic status were risk factors for these complications. Results: 24 Children (26 ears/26 implants) under five years were identified from the database and included in the study. There was a 14:10 male to female ratio. Patient caregivers reported subjective benefit and improved quality of life (QOL) despite setbacks and complications related to BAHA (R) usage. 10/24 (42%) of children required treatment for significant pen-implant skin reactions whilst 25% required replacement of their abutments and/or implants. An increased risk of major complication was associated with socioeconomic deprived backgrounds and in patients of New Zealand Maori and Pacific Island ethnicity but not in patients with increased weight centiles. Conclusions: The BAHA (R) implant and hearing aid system is of value to children under age 5 years. Parents tolerate the skin reactions and complications because of the perceived benefit in hearing and quality of life. Careful counselling of parents of potential young BAHA (R) implant candidates is necessary in light of this. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 480
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE NOBELPHARMA AUDITORY-SYSTEM BONE-ANCHORED HEARING-AID - THE EDMONTON EXPERIENCE
    LIEPERT, DR
    DITOPPA, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1994, 23 (06): : 411 - 418
  • [42] Has the use of the linear incision reduced skin complications in bone-anchored hearing aid implantation?
    Roplekar, R.
    Lim, A.
    Hussain, S. S. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2016, 130 (06): : 541 - 544
  • [43] The evidence base for aural rehabilitation with the bone-anchored hearing aid
    Proops, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2002, 116 : 1 - 1
  • [44] Results and complications of the Baha system (bone-anchored hearing aid)
    G. Ricci
    A. Della Volpe
    M. Faralli
    F. Longari
    M. Gullà
    N. Mansi
    A. Frenguelli
    [J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2010, 267 : 1539 - 1545
  • [45] Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid: Patient Satisfaction With the Cordelle Device
    Ho, Eu Chin
    Monksfield, Peter
    Egan, Elizabeth
    Reid, Andrew
    Proops, David
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2009, 30 (06) : 793 - 799
  • [46] Bone-anchored hearing aid: Comparison of benefit by patient subgroups
    McLarnon, CM
    Davison, T
    Johnson, IJM
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2004, 114 (05): : 942 - 944
  • [47] Osseointegrated Auditory Devices Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid and PONTO
    Ghossaini, Soha N.
    Roehm, Pamela C.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2019, 52 (02) : 243 - +
  • [48] THE BONE-ANCHORED HEARING-AID - OSSEOINTEGRATION AND AUDIOLOGICAL EFFECT
    BONDING, P
    JONSSON, MH
    SALOMON, G
    AHLGREN, P
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1992, : 42 - 45
  • [49] The bone-anchored hearing aid in children:: A surgical and questionnaire follow-up study
    Priwin, C
    Granström, G
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2005, 132 (04) : 559 - 565
  • [50] Results and complications of the Baha system (bone-anchored hearing aid)
    Ricci, G.
    Della Volpe, A.
    Faralli, M.
    Longari, F.
    Gulla, M.
    Mansi, N.
    Frenguelli, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 267 (10) : 1539 - 1545