Comparison of Complication Rates with Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Cefpodoxime Versus Fluoroquinolones After Transrectal Prostate Biopsy

被引:6
|
作者
Wenzel, Mike [1 ,2 ]
Welte, Maria N. [1 ]
Theissen, Lena H. [1 ]
Wittler, Clarissa [1 ]
Hoeh, Benedikt [1 ]
Humke, Clara [1 ]
Preisser, Felix [1 ]
Wurnschimmel, Christoph [2 ,3 ]
Tilki, Derya [3 ,4 ]
Graefen, Markus [3 ]
Roos, Frederik C. [1 ]
Becker, Andreas [1 ]
Karakiewicz, Pierre, I [2 ]
Chun, Felix K. H. [1 ]
Kluth, Luis A. [1 ]
Mandel, Philipp [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Urol, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Montreal, Div Urol, Canc Prognost & Hlth Outcomes Unit, Hlth Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin, Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 05期
关键词
Epididymitis; Fusion biopsy; Hematuria; Prostatitis; Prostate cancer; Systematic biopsy; Urinary tract infection; FOSFOMYCIN TROMETAMOL; RISK-FACTORS; INFECTIONS; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; RESISTANCE; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2020.11.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: After recommended restriction of the use of fluoroquinolones, the optimal antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy is still under debate. Objective: To test the effectiveness of cefpodoxime as oral antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsies and the complication rates relative to fluoroquinolones. Design, setting, and participants: Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsies at the Department of Urology at University Hospital Frankfurt was fluoroquinolones for 342 consecutive patients in January 2018 and December 2019 and cefpodoxime for 100 patients from January 2020 to July 2020. Data were prospectively evaluated and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were followed up according to clinical routine at 6 wk after biopsy at the earliest. Patients without follow-up (n = 98) and those receiving antibiotic prophylaxis other than cefpodoxime or fluoroquinolones (n = 15) were excluded. Intervention: Use of cefpodoxime or fluoroquinolones as antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsies. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Logistic regression models were used to predict biopsy-related complications according to antibiotic prophylaxis. Results and limitations: Of 442 patients, 100 (22.6%) received cefpodoxime as antibiotic prophylaxis. Patient baseline and biopsy characteristics were comparable between the cefpodoxime and fluoroquinolone groups. Moreover, there were no differences in the number of prior prostate biopsies or the proportions of systematic vs. fusion biopsies (p > 0.05). There were no differences between the groups in infectious complications such as epididymitis and prostatitis after biopsy. Infectious complication rates were very low, at 2.0% in the cefpodoxime and 0.9%fluoroquinolone group. Moreover, there were no differences between the groups in patient-reported complications, such as gross hema-turia occurring at more than 5 d after biopsy, hematospermia, or rectal bleeding. In multivariable analyses, after adjustment for patient and prostate biopsy characteristics, cefpodoxime was not associated with higher complication rates than fluoroquinolones (p > 0.05).
引用
收藏
页码:980 / 986
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Turkish Urologists' preferences regarding antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy
    Demirtas, Abdullah
    Eren, Esma
    Sonmez, Gokhan
    Tombul, Sevket Tolga
    Alp, Emine
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 46 (03): : 213 - +
  • [32] Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate: a randomized controlled study
    Aron, M
    Rajeev, TP
    Gupta, NP
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 85 (06) : 682 - 685
  • [33] Comment on: Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy-a new strategy
    Yang, Lu
    Gao, Liang
    Han, Ping
    Li, Xiang
    Wei, Qiang
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 70 (03) : 957 - 958
  • [34] IS THE CURRENT ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS POLICY IN TRANSRECTAL PROSTATE BIOPSY STILL SAFE?
    Thompson, Peter M.
    Philpott-Howard, John
    Wang, Wei
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (02) : 271 - 272
  • [35] Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy:: is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary?
    Puig, J
    Darnell, A
    Bermúdez, P
    Malet, A
    Serrate, G
    Baré, M
    Prats, J
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (04) : 939 - 943
  • [36] Emphysematous prostate abscess: A rare complication after transrectal prostate biopsy
    Hong, Seok Kwan
    Eng, Molly
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 : 71 - 71
  • [37] THE TRENDS OF COMPLICATION RATES AND THE ROLE OF AZTREONAM AS A PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTIC AFTER PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Kim, Sung Jin
    Chae, Han Kyu
    Nam, Wook
    Gwun, Kim Han
    Yeon, Park Jong
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E901 - E901
  • [38] A serious and unexpected infectious complication after transrectal prostate biopsy
    Nguyen, B. V.
    Cottrel, M.
    Ralec, B.
    Eyrieux, S.
    Giacardi, C.
    Commandeur, D.
    Ahmed, M. Ould
    MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES, 2009, 39 (09): : 735 - 738
  • [39] Ertapenem prophylaxis reduces sepsis after transrectal biopsy of the prostate
    Losco, Giovanni
    Studd, Rod
    Blackmore, Timothy
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 : 69 - 72
  • [40] Comparison of fosfomycin against fluoroquinolones for transrectal prostate biopsy prophylaxis: an individual patient-data meta-analysis
    Matthew J. Roberts
    Susan Scott
    Patrick N. Harris
    Kurt Naber
    Florian M. E. Wagenlehner
    Suhail A. R. Doi
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 323 - 330