Implication of integrins in eptifibatide interference with platelet stimulation of ovarian cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Isingizwe, Zitha Redempta
Kennedy, Amy L.
Sjoelund, Virginie
Benbrook, Doris M.
机构
[1] Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
[2] Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
[3] Cell Biology/Core facilities, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
[4] Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
来源
FASEB JOURNAL | 2022年 / 36卷
关键词
D O I
10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R4089
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
SIGNIFICANCE: A third of ovarian cancer patients have high platelet counts at diagnosis resulting in reduced survival compared to patients with low/normal platelet counts. Current studies suggest that platelets and ovarian cancer induce each other in a feed-forward loop. OBJECTIVE AND HYPOTHESIS: The objectives were to: 1) evaluate differences in platelet counts and aggregation between healthy and newly-diagnosed ovarian cancer patients; 2) develop an experimental model of the pathological interactions between platelets and ovarian cancer spheroids; and 3) identify pathways affected by these interactions and ways to intervene. Our hypothesis is that high platelet counts of ovarian cancer patients are associated with hypercoagulability, and inhibiting platelet aggregation reduces platelet-mediated effects on ovarian cancer spheroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Complete blood count was evaluated between healthy controls and newly-diagnosed ovarian cancer patients before treatment. A platelet aggregation assay was performed to assess platelet physiology between the two groups. The molecular mechanism of platelet effects on ovarian cancer spheroid properties was evaluated using mass spectrometry and bioinformatics analysis of a magnetic 3D cancer spheroid assay, in the presence and absence of eptifibatide, a potent platelet inhibitor. RESULTS: While ovarian cancer patients had significantly higher platelet counts than healthy controls, platelet aggregation profiles and parameters were similar between the two groups. Incubation of platelets with cancer spheroids altered spheroid size and density in an eptifibatide-sensitive manner. Co-incubation of platelets with ovarian cancer spheroids activated the LXR/RXR pathway, a known down-stream effector of the integrin receptor that eptifibatide targets. CONCLUSION: Platelet count does not predict platelet hypercoagulability in ovarian cancer patients. Pathological interaction between platelets and cancer cells can be mimicked in co-culture, and eptifibatide inhibits these pathological interactions, suggesting that eptifibatide is a candidate drug for prevention of ovarian cancer and thrombosis in ovarian cancer patients. The LXR/RXR pathway is a likely mediator of the eptifibatide interference in platelet-cancer interaction, and represents a candidate target for reducing platelet-mediated adverse events in ovarian cancer patients. © FASEB.
引用
收藏
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TELOMERE LENGTH AND ITS IMPLICATION AS PROGNOSTIC MARKER IN OVARIAN CANCER PATIENTS
    Atallah, D.
    Antoun, S.
    Moubarak, M.
    El Kassis, N.
    Tahtouh, R.
    Chahine, G.
    Hilal, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A434 - A434
  • [42] Ovarian stimulation: is there a long-term risk for ovarian, breast and endometrial cancer?
    Lerner-Geva, L.
    Rabinovici, J.
    Lunenfeld, B.
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH, 2010, 6 (06) : 831 - 839
  • [43] Aromatase Inhibitors for Ovarian Stimulation in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Ferreiro, Esteban
    Lopez de Uralde, Belen
    Abreu, Rita
    Garcia-Velasco, Juan A.
    Munoz, Elkin
    [J]. CURRENT DRUG TARGETS, 2020, 21 (09) : 910 - 921
  • [44] Ovarian Stimulation Is Safe and Effective for Patients with Gynecologic Cancer
    Akel, Ruba A.
    Guo, Xiaoyue M.
    Moravek, Molly B.
    Confino, Rafael
    Smith, Kristin N.
    Lawson, Angela K.
    Klock, Susan C.
    Tanner, Edward J., III
    Pavone, Mary Ellen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 367 - 374
  • [45] Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in women diagnosed with cancer
    Kim, S. Samuel
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (07) : 1269 - 1270
  • [46] Response to ovarian stimulation is not impacted by a breast cancer diagnosis
    Quinn, Molly M.
    Cakmak, Hakan
    Letourneau, Joseph M.
    Cedars, Marcelle I.
    Rosen, Mitchell P.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (03) : 568 - 574
  • [47] Ovarian stimulation since 50 years: Is there a risk for cancer?
    Lerner-Geva, L.
    Lunenfeld, B.
    [J]. 3RD CONGRESS OF THE ASIA PACIFIC INITIATIVE ON REPRODUCTION (ASPIRE 2010), 2010, : 25 - 30
  • [48] Random-start ovarian stimulation in patients with cancer
    Cakmak, Hakan
    Rosen, Mitchell P.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 27 (03) : 215 - 221
  • [49] Ovarian stimulation and risk of breast cancer in Swedish women
    Lundberg, Frida E.
    Iliadou, Anastasia N.
    Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny
    Bergh, Christina
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    Johansson, Anna L. V.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (01) : 137 - 144
  • [50] Ovarian stimulation in young adult cancer survivors on targeted cancer therapies
    Su, H. Irene
    Connell, Meghan W.
    Bazhenova, Lyudmila A.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (06) : 1475 - 1478