The demand for import services at US container ports

被引:48
|
作者
Anderson, Christopher M. [1 ]
Opaluch, James J. [1 ]
Grigalunas, Thomas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Environm & Nat Resource Econ, Kingston, RI 02818 USA
关键词
port choice; shipper behaviour; port demand; elasticity; willingness to pay;
D O I
10.1057/mel.2009.4
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
As global trade increases the interdependence of major world economies, the leading container ports of the United States are growing in importance as gateways from overseas production to domestic consumption markets. With this increased economic importance comes increased dependence of domestic and foreign economies on port practices and procedures, policy actions governing ports, and disasters (natural and otherwise) affecting port operations. Port practices, policy actions and events can affect the time it takes a ship to be serviced at a port, the price of using a port and interject schedule uncertainty at a port. These factors, in turn, affect cargo routers' choice of port, and the economic benefit (welfare) they receive from their chosen port. In this paper, we estimate a nested logit model, using over 470 000 import shipment routing choices to determine how cost, time and schedule reliability at the top 10 US ports affect cargo routers' port choices. From the estimated demand function, we calculate demand elasticities for actions and events affecting all ports, as well as each port individually, and 'willingness to pay' welfare measures to avoid increases in cost or time and decreases in reliability at top ports.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 185
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hub Status and Indexation of Container Ports
    Park, Yong-An
    Medda, Francesca
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS, 2015, 31 (02): : 253 - 272
  • [42] Efficiency Analysis of Mediterranean Container Ports
    Gokcek, Veysel
    Senol, Yunus Emre
    JOURNAL OF ETA MARITIME SCIENCE, 2018, 6 (02) : 129 - 140
  • [43] Hierarchical Model of Container Ports Throughput
    Rozmarynowska, M.
    Smolarek, L.
    TRANSNAV-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON MARINE NAVIGATION AND SAFETY OF SEA TRANSPORTATION, 2015, 9 (04) : 461 - 466
  • [44] A new connectivity index for container ports
    John J Bartholdi
    Pisit Jarumaneeroj
    Amar Ramudhin
    Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2016, 18 : 231 - 249
  • [45] CONTAINER TRAFFIC THROUGH DUTCH PORTS
    CORPER, M
    DOCK & HARBOUR AUTHORITY, 1969, 49 (581): : 435 - &
  • [46] CONTAINER POTENTIAL OF WEST AFRICAN PORTS
    HILLING, D
    DOCK & HARBOUR AUTHORITY, 1969, 50 (583): : 9 - &
  • [47] Container Ports Sustainability - A Literature Review
    Hakam, Moulay Hicham
    Solvang, Wei Deng
    2013 IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFOCOMMUNICATIONS (COGINFOCOM), 2013, : 803 - 810
  • [48] Tugboat electrification planning for container ports
    Chen, Tingting
    Wu, Lingxiao
    Wang, Shuaian
    Jia, Shuai
    Liu, Wei
    Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2025, 139
  • [49] Benchmarking the efficiency of Asian container ports
    Munisamy, Susila
    Singh, Gurcharan
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 5 (04): : 1397 - 1407
  • [50] Convergence and growth traps in container ports
    Oliveira, Gabriel Figueiredo de
    Schaffar, Alexandra
    Cariou, Pierre
    Monios, Jason
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2021, 110 : 170 - 180