Vaccines Mandates and Religion: Where are We Headed with the Current Supreme Court?

被引:4
|
作者
Reiss, Dorit R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Hastings Coll Law, Law, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Hastings Coll Law, Litigat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS | 2021年 / 49卷 / 04期
关键词
Vaccines; Public Health; Freedom of Religion; Supreme Court; Children's Rights; UNITED-STATES; NEW-YORK; VACCINATION; EXEMPTIONS; MEASLES; IMMUNIZATION; CALIFORNIA; PERTUSSIS; OUTBREAKS; LAWS;
D O I
10.1017/jme.2021.79
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article argues that the Supreme Court should not require a religious exemption from vaccine mandates. For children, who cannot yet make autonomous religious decision, religious exemptions would allow parents to make a choice that puts the child at risk and makes the shared environment of the school unsafe - risking other people's children. For adults, there are still good reasons not to require a religious exemption, since vaccines mandates are adopted for public health reasons, not to target religion, are an area where free riding is a real risk, no religion actually prohibits vaccinating under a mandate, and policing religious exemptions is very difficult.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 563
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条