Evidence-Based Interventions and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: The Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, 2015-2017

被引:6
|
作者
Sharma, Krishna P. [1 ]
DeGroff, Amy [1 ]
Maxwell, Annette E. [2 ]
Cole, Allison M. [3 ]
Escoffery, Ngoc Cam [4 ]
Hannon, Peggy A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, 4770 Buford Highway MF107-4, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, UCLA Fielding Sch Pub Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BREAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention administers the Colorectal Cancer Control Program to increase colorectal cancer screening rates among people aged 50-75 years in areas where rates are lower than state or national levels. The aim of this study is to better understand the effectiveness of specific Colorectal Cancer Control Program components. Methods: The study population included clinics enrolled in the Colorectal Cancer Control Program during Years 1 and 2. Clinic data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention annually from 2015 to 2017 for program evaluation were used. The outcome variable was screening rate change through Program Year 2, and predictor variables were a new implementation or enhancement of evidence-based interventions and other program components. The analysis, conducted in 2020, used ordinary least square and generalized estimating equations regressions and first difference models to estimate the associations of independent variables with the outcome. Results: Of the total 336 clinics, 50%-70% newly implemented or enhanced different evidence based interventions. Among these, client reminders were most highly associated with the increase in screening rates (8.0 percentage points). Provider reminder was not significantly associated with any change in screening rates. Among all program components, having a colorectal cancer screening champion was most highly (8.4 percentage points) associated with screening rate change. Results from different models were slightly different but in agreement. Conclusions: Client reminders, provider assessment and feedback, and colorectal cancer screening champions were associated with increased clinic-level colorectal cancer screening rates. Universal implementation of these strategies can substantially increase colorectal cancer screening rates in the U.S. (C) 2021 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 409
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implementation of a National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program
    Regula, Jaroslaw
    Zagorowicz, Edyta
    Butruk, Eugeniusz
    [J]. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS, 2006, 2 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [42] Mass screening for colorectal cancer: the French program
    Ponchon, T.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 39 (03) : 256 - 256
  • [43] Costs and effectiveness of interventions implemented to increase colorectal cancer screening in eight cdc colorectal cancer control program awardees
    Tangka, Florence
    Subramanian, Sujha
    Hoover, Sonja
    Lara, Christen
    Eastman, Casey
    Glaze, Becky
    Conn, Mary Ellen
    Barajas, Melissa
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15
  • [44] Hereditary and Common Familial Colorectal Cancer: Evidence for Colorectal Screening
    N. Jewel Samadder
    Kory Jasperson
    Randall W. Burt
    [J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2015, 60 : 734 - 747
  • [45] Hereditary and Common Familial Colorectal Cancer: Evidence for Colorectal Screening
    Samadder, N. Jewel
    Jasperson, Kory
    Burt, Randall W.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2015, 60 (03) : 734 - 747
  • [46] Evidence-based information for public health policy: The Colorectal Cancer Screening example.
    Coombs, AB
    Jones-McLean, E
    Bouchard, F
    White, K
    Berthelot, JM
    Le Petit, C
    Flanagan, W
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 153 (11) : S38 - S38
  • [47] Impact of a colorectal cancer screening program implantation on delays and prognosis of non-screening detected colorectal cancer
    Joaquin Cubiella
    María Lorenzo
    Franco Baiocchi
    Coral Tejido
    Alejandro Conde
    María Sande-Meijide
    Margarita Castro
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2021, (39) : 6689 - 6700
  • [48] Impact of a colorectal cancer screening program implantation on delays and prognosis of non-screening detected colorectal cancer
    Cubiella, Joaquin
    Lorenzo, Maria
    Baiocchi, Franco
    Tejido, Coral
    Conde, Alejandro
    Sande-Meijide, Maria
    Castro, Margarita
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 27 (39) : 6689 - 6700
  • [49] How well are we doing? stakeholder perspectives on implementing evidence-based interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening.
    Workman, Lauren
    Brandt, Heather
    Johnson, Hiluv
    Christian, Elijah
    Murday, Dave
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15
  • [50] Barriers to and facilitators of implementing colorectal cancer screening evidence-based interventions in federally qualified health centers: a qualitative study
    Dias, Emanuelle M.
    Padilla, Joe R.
    Cuccaro, Paula M.
    Walker, Timothy J.
    Balasubramanian, Bijal A.
    Savas, Lara S.
    Valerio-Shewmaker, Melissa A.
    Chenier, Roshanda S.
    Fernandez, Maria E.
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)