Evidence-Based Interventions and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: The Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, 2015-2017

被引:6
|
作者
Sharma, Krishna P. [1 ]
DeGroff, Amy [1 ]
Maxwell, Annette E. [2 ]
Cole, Allison M. [3 ]
Escoffery, Ngoc Cam [4 ]
Hannon, Peggy A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, 4770 Buford Highway MF107-4, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, UCLA Fielding Sch Pub Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BREAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention administers the Colorectal Cancer Control Program to increase colorectal cancer screening rates among people aged 50-75 years in areas where rates are lower than state or national levels. The aim of this study is to better understand the effectiveness of specific Colorectal Cancer Control Program components. Methods: The study population included clinics enrolled in the Colorectal Cancer Control Program during Years 1 and 2. Clinic data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention annually from 2015 to 2017 for program evaluation were used. The outcome variable was screening rate change through Program Year 2, and predictor variables were a new implementation or enhancement of evidence-based interventions and other program components. The analysis, conducted in 2020, used ordinary least square and generalized estimating equations regressions and first difference models to estimate the associations of independent variables with the outcome. Results: Of the total 336 clinics, 50%-70% newly implemented or enhanced different evidence based interventions. Among these, client reminders were most highly associated with the increase in screening rates (8.0 percentage points). Provider reminder was not significantly associated with any change in screening rates. Among all program components, having a colorectal cancer screening champion was most highly (8.4 percentage points) associated with screening rate change. Results from different models were slightly different but in agreement. Conclusions: Client reminders, provider assessment and feedback, and colorectal cancer screening champions were associated with increased clinic-level colorectal cancer screening rates. Universal implementation of these strategies can substantially increase colorectal cancer screening rates in the U.S. (C) 2021 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 409
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adoption and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions Among Cancer Control Program Grantees, 2009-2015
    Hannon, Peggy A.
    Maxwell, Annette E.
    Escoffery, Cam
    Thuy Vu
    Kohn, Marlana J.
    Gressard, Lindsay
    Dillon-Sumner, Laurel
    Mason, Caitlin
    Degroff, Amy
    [J]. PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2019, 16
  • [2] Use of Evidence-Based Interventions to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Joseph, Djenaba A.
    Redwood, Diana
    DeGroff, Amy
    Butler, Emily L.
    [J]. MMWR-MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 2016, 65 : 21 - 28
  • [3] Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Health Care Systems Using Evidence-Based Interventions
    DeGroff, Amy
    Sharma, Krishna
    Satsangi, Anamika
    Kenney, Kristy
    Joseph, Djenaba
    Ross, Katherine
    Leadbetter, Steven
    Helsel, William
    Kammerer, William
    Firth, Rick
    Rockwell, Tanner
    Short, William
    Tangka, Florence
    Wong, Faye
    Richardson, Lisa
    [J]. PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2018, 15
  • [4] Evidence-Based Interventions and Screening Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer in Comprehensive Cancer Control Plans: A Content Analysis
    Townsend, Julie S.
    Richardson, Lisa C.
    Steele, C. Brooke
    White, Dana E.
    [J]. PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2009, 6 (04):
  • [5] Rates of colorectal cancer screening
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    Dhaliwal, Dhali
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2008, 178 (11) : 1465 - 1465
  • [6] Colorectal Cancer Control Program Grantees' Use of Evidence-Based Interventions
    Hannon, Peggy A.
    Maxwell, Annette E.
    Escoffery, Cam
    Thuy Vu
    Kohn, Marlana
    Leeman, Jennifer
    Carvalho, Michelle L.
    Pfeiffer, Debbie J.
    Dwyer, Andrea
    Fernandez, Maria E.
    Vernon, Sally W.
    Liang, Lily
    DeGroff, Amy
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (05) : 644 - 648
  • [7] Evidence for colorectal cancer screening
    Bretthauer, Michael
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 417 - 425
  • [8] Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
    Cole, Allison M.
    Esplin, Andrea
    Baldwin, Laura-Mae
    [J]. PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2015, 12
  • [9] EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE AS A DRIVER OF IMPROVING COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING IN UKRAINE
    Rubtsova, I
    Melnyk, Y.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A651 - A652
  • [10] Colorectal cancer screening, ethics and evidence-based public policy Response
    Malila, Nea
    Palva, Tiina
    Malminiemi, Outi
    Paimela, Hannu
    Anttila, Ahti
    Hakulinen, Timo
    Jarvinen, Heikki
    Kotisaari, Marja-Liisa
    Pikkarainen, Pekka
    Rautalahti, Matti
    Sankila, Risto
    Vertio, Harri
    Hakama, Matti
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2011, 18 (02) : 103 - 104