MRI T2 Mapping of Knee Articular Cartilage Using Different Acquisition Sequences and Calculation Methods at 1.5 Tesla

被引:17
|
作者
Mars, Mokhtar [1 ]
Chelli, Mouna [2 ]
Tbini, Zeineb [1 ]
Ladeb, Fethi [2 ]
Gharbi, Souha [1 ]
机构
[1] Tunis Univ EL Manar, Higher Inst Med Technol Tunis, Res Lab Biophys & Med Technol, Tunis, Tunisia
[2] Tunis Univ EL Manar, Fac Med Tunis, Dept Radiol, Kassab Inst Orthoped, Tunis, Tunisia
关键词
Knee cartilage; MRI osteoarthritis; T2; mapping; Calculation methods; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; RELAXATION-TIME; T-2; VALUES; IN-VIVO; OSTEOARTHRITIS; QUANTITATION; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1159/000490796
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to determine how magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition techniques and calculation methods affect T2 values of knee cartilage at 1.5 tesla and to identify sequences that can be used for high-resolution T2 mapping in short scanning times. Materials and Methods: This study was performed on phantom and 29 patients who underwent MRI of the knee joint at 1.5 tesla. The protocol includes T2 mapping sequences based on Single-Echo Spin Echo (SESE), Multi-Echo Spin Echo (MESE), Fast Spin Echo (FSE) and Turbo Gradient Spin Echo (TGSE). The T2 relaxation times were quantified and evaluated using three calculation methods (MapIt, Syngo Offline and mono-exponential fit). signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were measured in all sequences. All statistical analyses were performed using the t-test. Results: The average T2 values in phantom were 41.7 +/- 13.8 ms for SESE, 43.2 +/- 14.4 ms for MESE, 42.4 +/- 14.1 ms for FSE and 44 +/- 14.5 ms for TGSE. In the patient study, the mean differences were 6.5 +/- 8.2 ms, 7.8 +/- 7.6 ms and 8.4 +/- 14.2 ms for MESE, FSE and TGSE compared to SESE, respectively; these statistical results were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The comparison between the three calculation methods showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The t-test showed no significant difference between SNR values for all sequences. Conclusion: T2 values depend not only on the sequence type but also on the calculation method. None of the sequences revealed significant differences compared to the SESE reference sequence. TGSE with its short scanning time can be used for high-resolution T2 mapping. (c) 2018 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 450
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantitative MRI in the evaluation of articular cartilage health: reproducibility and variability with a focus on T2 mapping
    Surowiec, Rachel K.
    Lucas, Erin P.
    Ho, Charles P.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (06) : 1385 - 1395
  • [32] Quantitative MRI in the evaluation of articular cartilage health: reproducibility and variability with a focus on T2 mapping
    Rachel K. Surowiec
    Erin P. Lucas
    Charles P. Ho
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014, 22 : 1385 - 1395
  • [33] MRI T1ρ and T2 mapping for the assessment of articular cartilage changes in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis after hemicallotasis osteotomy
    Nishioka, H.
    Nakamura, E.
    Hirose, J.
    Okamoto, N.
    Yamabe, S.
    Mizuta, H.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2016, 5 (07): : 294 - 300
  • [34] MRI evaluation of articular cartilage in patients with juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (JOCD) using T2*mapping at 3T
    Ludwig, K. D.
    Johnson, C. P.
    Zbyn, S.
    Nowacki, A.
    Marette, S.
    Takahashi, T.
    Macalena, J. A.
    Nelson, B. J.
    Tompkins, M. A.
    Carlson, S.
    Ellermann, J. M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2020, 28 (09) : 1235 - 1244
  • [35] T2 relaxation time in patellar cartilage - Global and regional reproducibility at 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla
    Glaser, C.
    Horng, A.
    Mendlik, T.
    Weckbach, S.
    Hoffmann, R. -T.
    Wagner, S.
    Raya, J. G.
    Horger, W.
    Reiser, M.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2007, 179 (02): : 146 - 152
  • [36] T2* measurement of the knee articular cartilage in osteoarthritis at 3T
    Newbould, Rexford D.
    Miller, Sam R.
    Toms, Laurence D.
    Swann, Peter
    Tielbeek, Jeroen A. W.
    Gold, Garry E.
    Strachan, Robin K.
    Taylor, Peter C.
    Matthews, Paul M.
    Brown, Andrew P.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 35 (06) : 1422 - 1429
  • [37] T2 Mapping Values in Postmeniscectomy Knee Articular Cartilage after Running: Early Signs of Osteoarthritis?
    Lindner, Dror
    Chechik, Yigal
    Beer, Yiftah
    Tal, Sigal
    Lysyy, Oleg
    Blumenfeld-Katzir, Tamar
    Ben-Eliezer, Noam
    Agar, Gabriel
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2022, 35 (07) : 739 - 749
  • [38] Functional cartilage MRI T2 mapping: evaluating the effect of age and training on knee cartilage response to running
    Mosher, T. J.
    Liu, Y.
    Torok, C. M.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2010, 18 (03) : 358 - 364
  • [39] ARE HEPATIC AND MUSCLE T2 VALUES DIFFERENT AT 0.5 AND 1.5 TESLA
    BERNARDINO, ME
    CHALOUPKA, JC
    MALKO, JA
    CHEZMAR, JL
    NELSON, RC
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1989, 7 (04) : 363 - 367
  • [40] Biochemical magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage: T1rho and T2 mapping as cartilage degeneration biomarkers
    Le, Jenna
    Peng, Qi
    Sperling, Karen
    MUSCULOSKELETAL REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2016, 1383 : 34 - 42