A combined experimental and computational fluid dynamics analysis of the dynamics of drop formation

被引:10
|
作者
Fawehinmi, B
Gaskell, PH
Jimack, PK
Kapur, N
Thompson, HM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Mech Engn, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Comp, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
drop formation; experiments; computational fluid dynamics; VOF;
D O I
10.1243/095440605X31788
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This article presents a complementary experimental and computational investigation of the effect of viscosity and flowrate on the dynamics of drop formation in the dripping mode. In contrast to previous studies, numerical simulations are performed with two popular commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) packages, CFX and FLOW-3D, both of which employ the volume of fluid (VOF) method. Comparison with previously published experimental and computational data and new experimental results reported here highlight the capabilities and limitations of the aforementioned packages. Results at high flowrates and higher viscosity show that the singlephase simulation technique (FLOW-3D) offers significant efficiency gains' when compared with a multi-phase approach (CFX). Furthermore, comparison with experimental results reveals that for the same grid resolution, the single and multiphase solvers offer similar accuracy of prediction and both are able to capture the features of greatest practical engineering interest, such as primary drop volume as a function of flowrate. For low flowrates and viscosity, for example, which exhibit fine interfacial features such as thin liquid threads and the existence of satellite drops, the CFD predictions are found, in general, to be poorer with the issue of free surface smearing introduced by the VOF method and surface tension becoming dominant. In such cases, neither of the commercial packages is found to offer wholly reliable engineering design data.
引用
收藏
页码:933 / 947
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experimental methodology for computational fluid dynamics code validation
    Aeschliman, DP
    Oberkampf, WL
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1998, 36 (05) : 733 - 741
  • [22] Detailed computational and experimental fluid dynamics of fluidized beds
    Deen, N. G.
    Annaland, M. Van Sint
    Kuipers, J. A. M.
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2006, 30 (11) : 1459 - 1471
  • [23] The use of computational fluid dynamics in TsAGI experimental works
    S. M. Bosnyakov
    V. O. Akinfiev
    V. V. Vlasenko
    S. A. Glazkov
    A. R. Gorbushin
    E. V. Kazhan
    I. A. Kursakov
    A. V. Lysenkov
    S. V. Matyash
    S. V. Mikhailov
    [J]. Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations, 2012, 4 (3) : 297 - 320
  • [24] Computational and Experimental Fluid Dynamics of Jet Loop Reactor
    Mathpati, Channamallikarjun S.
    Deshpande, Sagar S.
    Joshi, Jyeshtharaj B.
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 2009, 55 (10) : 2526 - 2544
  • [25] Development of a Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for Ice Formation: Validation and Parameter Analysis
    Ferro, Carlo Giovanni
    Maggiore, Paolo
    Champvillair, Daniele
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (05)
  • [26] Computational Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer Analysis of Vortex Formation in a Solar Reactor
    Chien, Min-Hsiu
    Ozalp, Nesrin
    Morrison, Gerald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS, 2015, 7 (04)
  • [27] Quantum Fluid Dynamics and Quantum Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Lin, C. T.
    Kuo, J. K.
    Yen, T. H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND THEORETICAL NANOSCIENCE, 2009, 6 (05) : 1090 - 1108
  • [28] An Experimental Analysis of a Solar Greenhouse Drier: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Validation
    Lokeswaran, S.
    Eswaramoorthy, M.
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2013, 35 (21) : 2062 - 2071
  • [29] Analysis of isothermal annular jets: Comparison of computational fluid dynamics and experimental data
    Moore, EM
    Shambaugh, RL
    Papavassiliou, DV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 2004, 94 (03) : 909 - 922
  • [30] Computational fluid dynamics
    Wagner, Siegfried
    [J]. HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING '07, 2008, : 255 - +