The Application of the Best-Worst Method to Gain the Premier Modified Asphalt Mixtures

被引:4
|
作者
Zarei, M. [1 ]
Kordani, A. A.
Salehikalam, A.
Akbarinia, F.
Karimi, M.
Javadi, S.
机构
[1] Imam Khomeini Int Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Qazvin, Iran
来源
关键词
Best-Worst Method; HMA; Certain Situation; Uncertain Situation; Marshall Method; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; BLACK;
D O I
10.56748/ejse.21292
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The main purpose of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) is to choose the most suitable and the most affordable mix of bitumen and aggregates, so that it can maintain the technical properties of the asphalt concrete in certain amounts. Different methods have been suggested for mixing the Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) including the Marshall method, the modified Marshall method, Hveem method, and the Superpave mixing method. Concurrently, the project of mixing Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) in Iran is done based on the Marshall method and the modified Marshall method. Regarding the weaknesses of the asphalt mixes in different situations, the engineers try to modify and improve the properties of the asphalt mix by use of different additives. On the other hand, the additional expenses of various additives to the asphalt mix for building one kilometer of the road is a negative parameter. However, by use of the additives, the technical properties of the asphalt mix improve. Therefore, to decide on a proper choice out of the alternatives would be a difficult task. This paper, tries to provide an appropriate method for evaluating and choosing the best alternative by taking into consideration all the technical criteria. In this article, we first evaluate the score and the weight of each alternative in each criterion. Then, the weight of each criterion is evaluated using the best-worst method, and eventually, taking all aspects into consideration, the rankings of different alternatives will be determined based on two situations: certain situation and uncertain situation.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 70
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Novel Extension of Best-Worst Method With Intuitionistic Fuzzy Reference Comparisons
    Wan, Shuping
    Dong, Jiuying
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 30 (06) : 1698 - 1711
  • [42] Is the best-worst method path dependent? Evidence from an empirical study
    Mazurek, Jiri
    Perzina, Radomir
    Strzalka, Dominik
    Kowal, Bartosz
    Kuras, Pawel
    Puhrova, Barbora Petru
    Rajs, Robert
    [J]. 4OR-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 22 (03): : 387 - 409
  • [43] Best-worst scaling, an alternative method to assess perceptual sound qualities
    Rosi, Victor
    Ravillion, Aliette
    Houix, Olivier
    Susini, Patrick
    [J]. JASA EXPRESS LETTERS, 2022, 2 (06):
  • [44] MODAL SPLIT ANALYSIS BY BEST-WORST METHOD AND MULTINOMINAL LOGIT MODEL
    Cingel, Michal
    Drliciak, Marek
    Celko, Jan
    Zabovska, Katarina
    [J]. TRANSPORT PROBLEMS, 2023, 18 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [45] Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best-Worst scaling method
    Pinto, Luis
    Kaynak, Erdener
    Chow, Clement S. F.
    Zhang, Lida L.
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2019, 31 (01) : 223 - 245
  • [46] DETERMINATION OF IMPORTANCE FOR NEW VACCINE ADOPTION: A BEST-WORST SCALING METHOD
    Pooripussarakul, S.
    Riewpaiboon, A.
    Bishai, D.
    Bridges, J. F.
    Tantivess, S.
    Muangchana, C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A47 - A47
  • [47] A multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria decision making
    Brunelli, Matteo
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 47 (01) : 12 - 15
  • [48] Bayesian best-worst method: A probabilistic group decision making model
    Mohammadi, Majid
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. Omega (United Kingdom), 2020, 96
  • [49] Japanese Consumer Preference for Raw Fish: Best-Worst Scaling Method
    Sajiki, Takahiro
    Lu, Yu-Heng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TAIWAN, 2021, 29 (06): : 810 - 818
  • [50] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57