When community forestry meets REDD plus : has REDD plus helped address implementation barriers to participatory forest management in Tanzania?

被引:19
|
作者
Blomley, Tom [1 ]
Edwards, Karen
Kingazi, Stephano
Lukumbuzya, Kahana
Makela, Merja [2 ]
Vesa, Lauri [2 ]
机构
[1] Acacia Nat Resource Consultants Ltd, Reading, Berks, England
[2] Niras Finland, Vantaa, Finland
关键词
Participatory forest management; REDD; Tanzania;
D O I
10.1080/17531055.2017.1356623
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Tanzania has a progressive forest policy and legal jurisdiction for land and natural resource tenure, coupled with a strong decentralisation process that mandates village institutions with forest management responsibilities. Participatory forest management (PFM) has been a central part of government as well as a donor focus in the forest sector since the early 1990s. Numerous studies have been carried out by Tanzanian and international researchers to assess performance and synthesise experiences of PFM in recent years. The results are well documented, including the identification of a number of key bottlenecks to implementation and up-scaling. From 2009 onwards, a series of pilot projects were launched to develop and test local-level approaches to REDD+, all of which have now come to an end, and have recently been subjected to external evaluations. A central theme of many of these projects was the application of community-based approaches to forest and woodland management, building strongly on the legal framework for PFM. When REDD+ was adopted by the Tanzanian government as a new policy, feelings among civil society regarding how REDD+ might impact hard-won forest and land tenure rights were mixed. Some observers feared that REDD+ would stifle PFM and lead to a recentralisation of forest tenure by government, while others felt that REDD+ offered new opportunities for addressing long-standing bottlenecks and governance barriers to PFM implementation. Combining PFM with the specific goal of reducing forest carbon emissions has generated important lessons, some of which have the potential to strengthen the application of PFM in Tanzania and elsewhere. In some cases, we found that orienting PFM to REDD+ goals has helped address long-standing barriers to PFM implementation. In other cases, REDD+ has highlighted new weaknesses with current approaches to PFM, while elsewhere it has created problems where none existed before.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 570
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Are REDD plus community forest projects following the principles for collective action, as proposed by Ostrom?
    Saeed, Abdul-Razak
    McDermott, Constance
    Boyd, Emily
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2017, 11 (01): : 572 - 596
  • [42] Sustainable Forest Management, FLEGT, and REDD plus : Exploring Interlinkages to Strengthen Forest Policy Coherence
    Tegegne, Yitagesu Tekle
    Cramm, Mathias
    van Brusselen, Jo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [43] REDD plus , Adaptation, and sustainable forest management: toward effective polycentric global forest governance
    Long, Andrew
    TROPICAL CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2013, 6 (03): : 384 - 408
  • [44] Implementing REDD through community-based forest management: Lessons from Tanzania
    Robinson, Elizabeth J. Z.
    Albers, Heidi J.
    Meshack, Charles
    Lokina, Razack B.
    NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2013, 37 (03) : 141 - 152
  • [45] Estimating the causal effect of forestry programs on forest recovery in a REDD plus priority area in Michoac?an, Mexico
    Spiric, Jovanka
    Angel Salinas-Melgoza, Miguel
    Merlo-Reyes, Ana
    Isabel Ramirez, M.
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2023, 146
  • [46] REDD plus implementation in a high forest low deforestation area: Constraints on monitoring forest carbon emissions
    Guadalupe, Vicente
    Sotta, Eleneide Doff
    Santos, Valdenira Ferreira
    Goncalves Aguiar, Leonardo Jose
    Vieira, Marta
    de Oliveira, Cinthia Pereira
    Nascimento Siqueira, Joao Vitor
    LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 76 : 414 - 421
  • [47] A Collaborative Forest Management user group's perceptions and expectations on REDD plus in Nepal
    Gilani, Hans R.
    Yoshida, Tomoko
    Innes, John L.
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 80 : 27 - 33
  • [48] Complexities in accessing REDD plus benefits in community forestry: evidence from Nepal's Terai region
    Devkota, B. P.
    Mustalahti, I
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2018, 20 (03) : 332 - 345
  • [49] Heterogeneous public preference for REDD plus projects under different forest management regimes
    Rakatama, Ari
    Pandit, Ram
    Iftekhar, Sayed
    Ma, Chunbo
    LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 78 : 266 - 277
  • [50] Actors' perceptions of forest biodiversity values and policy issues related to REDD plus implementation in Peru
    Entenmann, Steffen Karl
    Schmitt, Christine Brigitte
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2013, 22 (05) : 1229 - 1254