Management alternatives in national park areas: the case of Ilgaz Mountain National Park

被引:6
|
作者
Ozturk, Sevgi [1 ]
Ayan, Sezgin [2 ]
机构
[1] Kastamonu Univ, Fac Engn & Architecture, Dept Landscape Architecture, Kastamonu, Turkey
[2] Kastamonu Univ, Fac Forestry, Forest Engn Dept, Kastamonu, Turkey
关键词
AHP technique; alternative management models; Ilgaz Mountain National Park; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; DECISION;
D O I
10.1553/eco.mont-7-1s37
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
National parks are the biggest and most important nature conservation systems in Turkey, but no effective protection approach has been applied in Turkey since the national park was established in 1976. Ilgaz Mountain National Park (IMNP) is a very important mountain ecosystem with its abundance of biological, natural and cultural diversity. It also has aesthetic and recreational potential and winter tourism facilities to attract a great number of visitors. But tourism policy in the area is not sustainable and there are management issues. For these reasons, all the factors and their alternatives were determined and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was used to find the best management alternative. The model of protection-supported usage (0.3903) emerged as the most suitable management alternative.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:37 / 44
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Effect of National Park Mobile Apps on National Park Behavioral Intention: Taman Negara National Park
    Mihanyar, Payam
    Abd Rahman, Sofiah
    Aminudin, Norliza
    FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MARKETING AND RETAILING (5TH INCOMAR) 2015, 2015, 37 : 324 - 330
  • [42] Preferences for sustainable mobility in natural areas: The case of Teide National Park
    Marina Gonzalez, Rosa
    Roman, Concepcion
    de Dios Ortuzar, Juan
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 76 : 42 - 51
  • [43] Wild mushrooms from Ilgaz Mountain National Park (Western Black Sea, Turkey): element concentrations and their health risk assessment
    Feyyaz Keskin
    Cengiz Sarikurkcu
    Ahmet Demirak
    Ilgaz Akata
    Arzuhan Sihoglu Tepe
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 31923 - 31942
  • [44] NATIONAL PARK
    Simonds, Sandra
    CHICAGO REVIEW, 2021, 64-65 (4-1) : 175 - 176
  • [45] The Game Drives of Rocky Mountain National Park.
    Wilke, PJ
    PLAINS ANTHROPOLOGIST, 1998, 43 (166) : 424 - 425
  • [46] AN IRRUPTION OF ELK IN RIDING MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK, MANITOBA
    BANFIELD, AWF
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1949, 13 (01): : 127 - 134
  • [47] MOUNTAIN TOURISM IN MACEDONIA: ASSESSMENT OF THE NATIONAL PARK "PELISTER"
    Dimitrov, Nikola
    Markoski, Blagoja
    Petrevska, Biljana
    Koteski, Cane
    3RD INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE GEOBALCANICA 2017, 2017, : 225 - 232
  • [48] Wildlife and aspen in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado
    Packard, FM
    ECOLOGY, 1942, 23 (04) : 478 - 482
  • [49] Nutritional condition of elk in Rocky Mountain National Park
    Bender, LC
    Cook, JG
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2005, 65 (03) : 329 - 334
  • [50] Bryophyte flora of Taebaeksan Mountain National Park in Korea
    Bum, Hyun Min
    Park, Seung Jin
    Bakalin, Vadim A.
    Choi, Bongsu
    Sim, Sun Hee
    Hyun, Chang Woo
    Choi, Seung Se
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PLANT TAXONOMY, 2020, 50 (03): : 262 - 278