Diagnostic Performance of Multidetector Computed Tomography for Suspected Acute Appendicitis

被引:131
|
作者
Pickhardt, Perry J. [1 ]
Lawrence, Edward M. [1 ]
Pooler, B. Dustin [1 ]
Bruce, Richard J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Radiol, Clin Sci Ctr E3 311, Madison, WI 53792 USA
关键词
LOWER-QUADRANT PAIN; NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY RATE; HELICAL CT; ORAL CONTRAST; ADULTS; IMPACT; US; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; SCAN;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-154-12-201106210-00006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Use of preoperative computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis has dramatically increased since the introduction of multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MDCT for suspected acute appendicitis in adults. Design: Analysis of MDCT findings and clinical outcomes of consecutive adults referred for MDCT for suspected appendicitis from January 2000 to December 2009. Setting: Single academic medical center in the United States. Patients: 2871 adults. Measurements: Interpretation of nonfocused abdominopelvic MDCT scans by radiologists who were aware of the study indication. Posttest assessment of diagnostic performance of MDCT for acute appendicitis, according to the reference standard of final combined clinical, surgical, and pathology findings. Results: 675 of 2871 patients (23.5%) had confirmed acute appendicitis. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of MDCT were 98.5% (95% CI, 97.3% to 99.2%) (665 of 675 patients), 98.0% (CI, 97.4% to 98.6%) (2153 of 2196 patients), 99.5% (CI, 99.2% to 99.8%) (2153 of 2163 patients), and 93.9% (CI, 91.9% to 95.5%) (665 of 708 patients), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 51.3 (CI, 38.1 to 69.0) and 0.015 (CI, 0.008 to 0.028), respectively. The overall rate of negative findings at appendectomy was 7.5% (CI, 5.8% to 9.7%) (54 of 716 patients), but would have decreased to 4.1% (28 of 690 patients) had surgery been avoided in 26 cases with true-negative findings on MDCT. The overall perforation rate was 17.8% (120 of 675 patients) but progressively decreased from 28.9% in 2000 to 11.5% in 2009. Multidetector computed tomography provided or suggested an alternative diagnosis in 893 of 2122 patients (42.1%) without appendicitis or appendectomy. Limitation: Possible referral bias, because some patients whose appendicitis was difficult to diagnose on clinical grounds may not have been referred for MDCT for evaluation of suspected appendicitis. Conclusion: Multidetector computed tomography is a useful test for routine evaluation of suspected appendicitis in adults.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 796
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic Performance on Low Dose Computed Tomography For Acute Appendicitis Among Attending and Resident Radiologists
    Chang, Chih-Chen
    Wong, Yon-Cheong
    Wu, Cheng-Hsien
    Chen, Huan-Wu
    Wang, Li-Jen
    Lee, Yu-Hsien
    Wu, Patricia Wanping
    Irama, Wiwan
    Chen, Wei Yuan
    Chang, Chee-Jen
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (02)
  • [22] Focused abdominal computed tomography (FACT) in clinically suspected Adolescent Acute Appendicitis
    Karim, M. Osman
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 92 - 92
  • [23] Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for foreign body aspiration in children
    Manach, Yves
    Pierrot, Sebastien
    Couloigner, Vincent
    Ayari-Khalfallah, Sonia
    Nicollas, Richard
    Venail, Frederic
    Pondaven, Soizick
    Baculard, Florence
    Tantcheu, Victor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 77 (05) : 808 - 812
  • [24] Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis
    Lai, Vincent
    Chan, Wan Chi
    Lau, Hin Yue
    Yeung, Tsz Wai
    Wong, Yiu Chung
    Yuen, Ming Keung
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2012, 36 (01) : 29 - 34
  • [25] Multidetector computed tomography in acute abdomen
    Carreras Aja, M.
    Arrieta Artieda, I.
    Borruel Nacenta, S.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2011, 53 : 60 - 69
  • [26] Diagnostic Value of Laparoscopy, Abdominal Computed Tomography, and Ultrasonography in Acute Appendicitis
    Bachar, Ira
    Perry, Zvi Howard
    Dukhno, Larisa
    Mizrahi, Solly
    Kirshtein, Boris
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (12): : 982 - 989
  • [27] Acute Appendicitis in Children: Evaluation of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography
    Baykara, Aziz Serhat
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [28] DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN COMPARISON WITH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSING ACUTE APPENDICITIS
    Krishnan, Krishna Kumar Rama
    Kodumur, Venugopal
    Parthiban, N.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (16): : 2033 - 2037
  • [29] Diagnostic Usefulness of Low-Dose Nonenhanced Computed Tomography With Coronal Reformations in Patients With Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Comparison With Standard-Dose Computed Tomography
    Yun, Seong Jong
    Kim, Hyun Cheol
    Yang, Dal Mo
    Kim, Sang Won
    Rhee, Sun Jung
    Shin, Jong Soo
    Ahn, Sung Eun
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2016, 40 (03) : 485 - 492
  • [30] Role of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in diagnosis of subhepatic appendicitis
    Abougabal, Ahmed Mohamed
    Afifi, Ahmed Hafez
    Kasem, Mohamed Ibrahim
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 43 (03): : 347 - 352