Velocity Measurement at Carotid Siphon: Quantitative Comparison of Phase Contrast MRI and Computational Fluid Dynamics

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Chi [1 ]
Yang, Jinfeng [1 ]
Ding, Ning [1 ]
Chang, Feiyan [2 ]
Xie, Sheng [2 ]
Li, Deyu [3 ]
Hou, Xiaoxu [4 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Beihang Univ, State Key Lab Virtual Real Technol & Syst, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Inst Food & Drug Control, Beijing 102629, Peoples R China
关键词
Carotid siphon; Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging; Computational fluid dynamics; Blood flow; Velocity field; BLOOD-FLOW; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; VALIDATION; ARTERIES;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-10-9035-6_92
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC MRI) and the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are two of the most important technologies in the investigation on the velocity field in blood vessels in vivo. In order to quantitatively compare the differences between the two methods, the blood flow velocity measurements based on PC MRI and patient-specific CFD were conducted at internal carotid artery from 9 healthy volunteers. The 3D velocity field calculated from PC MRI data were compared with CFD simulation in 5 planes covering the carotid siphon. Then the resistance index (RI), and errors in the magnitude and direction of velocity were calculated between the two methods. The results showed that the flow patterns of PC MRI and CFD were similar, and the velocity distribution and RI was in good agreement. But there were significant differences in the velocity magnitude near the posterior knee and vessel wall, while the directional error was larger at the center of the artery. These comparison between PC MRI and CFD may guide the development of CFD technology and improve its accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 504
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Velocity Measurement in Carotid Artery: Quantitative Comparison of Time-Resolved 3D Phase-Contrast MRI and Image-based Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Sarrami-Foroushani, Ali
    Esfahany, Mohsen Nasr
    Moghaddam, Abbas Nasiraei
    Rad, Hamidreza Saligheh
    Firouznia, Kavous
    Shakiba, Madjid
    Ghanaati, Hossein
    Wilkinson, Iain David
    Frangi, Alejandro Federico
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 12 (04)
  • [2] QUANTITATIVE HEMODYNAMIC COMPARISON OF VELOCITY VALUES FROM COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS AND PHASE-CONTRAST MRI IN AN IN-VITRO ANEURYSM MODEL
    George, Stephanie M.
    Cao, Amos
    Giddens, Don P.
    Oshinski, John N.
    Tong, Frank C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 99 - 100
  • [3] Coronary artery bifurcation haemodynamics - comparison between phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics
    Susann Beier
    John Ormiston
    Mark Webster
    John Cater
    Pau Medrano-Gracia
    Alistair Young
    Brett R Cowan
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 16 (Suppl 1)
  • [4] 4D phase contrast MRI in intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with patient-specific computational fluid dynamics with temporal and spatial velocity boundary conditions as measured with 3D phase contrast MRI
    Pim van Ooij
    Joppe Schneiders
    Henk Marquering
    Charles B Majoie
    Ed vanBavel
    Aart Nederveen
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 14 (Suppl 1)
  • [5] Wall shear stress calculations based on 3D cine phase contrast MRI and computational fluid dynamics: a comparison study in healthy carotid arteries
    Cibis, Merih
    Potters, Wouter V.
    Gijsen, Frank J. H.
    Marquering, Henk
    VanBavel, Ed
    van der Steen, Antonius F. W.
    Nederveen, Aart J.
    Wentzel, Jolanda J.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2014, 27 (07) : 826 - 834
  • [6] Velocity vector comparison between vector flow imaging and computational fluid dynamics in the carotid bifurcation
    Poloni, Sofia
    Bozzetto, Michela
    Du, Yigang
    Aiani, Luca
    Goddi, Alfredo
    Fiorina, Ilaria
    Remuzzi, Andrea
    ULTRASONICS, 2023, 128
  • [7] Comparing velocity and fluid shear stress in a stenotic phantom with steady flow: phase-contrast MRI, particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics
    Khodarahmi, Iman
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (04) : 385 - 393
  • [8] Comparing velocity and fluid shear stress in a stenotic phantom with steady flow: phase-contrast MRI, particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics
    Iman Khodarahmi
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2015, 28 : 385 - 393
  • [9] Mathematical modeling of carotid atheroma using MRI and computational fluid dynamics
    Pena, A
    Graves, M
    U-King-Im, J
    Trivedi, R
    Pickard, JD
    Kirkpatrick, PJ
    Gillard, JH
    STROKE, 2003, 34 (01) : 271 - 271
  • [10] Comparison of 4D Phase-Contrast MRI Flow Measurements to Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Cerebrospinal Fluid Motion in the Cervical Spine
    Yiallourou, Theresia I.
    Kroeger, Jan Robert
    Stergiopulos, Nikolaos
    Maintz, David
    Martin, Bryn A.
    Bunck, Alexander C.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):