Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment: A novel conceptual framework for soil

被引:35
|
作者
Raymundo Pavan, Ana Laura [1 ]
Ometto, Aldo Roberto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Engn Sao Carlos, Ctr Water Resources & Appl Ecol, 400 Trabalhador Sao Carlense Ave, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Dept Prod Engn, 400 Trabalhador Sao Carlense Ave, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
关键词
Life Cycle Assessment; Life Cycle Impact Assessment; Soil; Ecosystem Services; LAND-USE; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION; VALUATION; CASCADE; SYSTEMS; FUTURE; GOODS; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.191
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecosystem Services (ES) are the direct and indirect contributions of ecosystems to human well-being, which include provision of food and water, regulation of flood and erosion processes, soil formation and non-material benefits such as recreation. The integration of ES impact modeling in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) still has limitations regarding the typology embodied and some conceptual errors in not actually evaluating the benefits provided by ES. In this context, soil is an important resource and provides a wide diversity of ES. Therefore, this article aims to: (i) Review the evolution of ES assessment in LCA and the current methods used to study the biophysical aspects of ES; (ii) Compare the ES cascade model and LCA environmental mechanism for land use impacts; and (iii) Improve and synthesize a new conceptual framework for soil-ES assessment in LCA studies. Results show that the cascade model provides a useful framework for operationalizing ES assessment and should integrate LCA. Thus, this study proposes a new conceptual framework for soil-ES including the main soil processes, functions, services, benefits and values. Each of these cascade model steps is aligned with LCA terminology in order to match the usual midpoint or endpoint levels of modeling. Future works should focus on new indicators to measure the supply of ES and their benefit to humans as well as indicators to their value. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1337 / 1347
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Conceptual Framework of Ecosystem Services in Landscape Planning, Malaysia
    Bak, Yeo Lee
    Said, Ismail
    Saito, Kei
    Teck, Gabriel Ling Hoh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 3 (03): : 142 - 149
  • [22] Towards integrating the ecosystem services cascade framework within the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) cause-effect methodology
    Rugani, Benedetto
    de Souza, Danielle Maia
    Weidema, Bo P.
    Bare, Jane
    Bakshi, Bhavik
    Grann, Blane
    Johnston, John M.
    Raymundo Pavan, Ana Laura
    Liu, Xinyu
    Laurent, Alexis
    Verones, Francesca
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 690 : 1284 - 1298
  • [23] Life cycle assessment needs predictive spatial modelling for biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
    Sarah Sim
    Perrine Hamel
    Benjamin Bryant
    Ryan Noe
    Carina Mueller
    Giles Rigarlsford
    Michal Kulak
    Virginia Kowal
    Richard Sharp
    Julie Clavreul
    Edward Price
    Stephen Polasky
    Mary Ruckelshaus
    Gretchen Daily
    [J]. Nature Communications, 8
  • [24] Including Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment: Methodology and Application to Urban Farms
    Liu, Xinyu
    Charles, Michael
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    [J]. 26TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE), 2019, 80 : 287 - 291
  • [25] Accounting for Ecosystem Services in Life Cycle Assessment, Part I: A Critical Review
    Zhang, Yi
    Singh, Shweta
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (07) : 2232 - 2242
  • [26] Life cycle assessment needs predictive spatial modelling for biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
    Sim, Sarah
    Hamel, Perrine
    Bryant, Benjamin
    Noe, Ryan
    Mueller, Carina
    Rigarlsford, Giles
    Kulak, Michal
    Kowal, Virginia
    Sharp, Richard
    Clavreul, Julie
    Price, Edward
    Polasky, Stephen
    Ruckelshaus, Mary
    Daily, Gretchen
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 8
  • [27] A consistent conceptual framework for applying climate metrics in technology life cycle assessment
    Mallapragada, Dharik
    Mignone, Bryan K.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (07):
  • [28] Cognitive Soil Digital Twin for Monitoring the Soil Ecosystem: A Conceptual Framework
    Tsakiridis, Nikolaos L.
    Samarinas, Nikiforos
    Kalopesa, Eleni
    Zalidis, George C.
    [J]. SOIL SYSTEMS, 2023, 7 (04)
  • [29] A conceptual framework to assess the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services
    Rounsevell, M. D. A.
    Dawson, T. P.
    Harrison, P. A.
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (10) : 2823 - 2842
  • [30] A conceptual framework for the governance of multiple ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes
    Aude Vialatte
    Cecile Barnaud
    Julien Blanco
    Annie Ouin
    Jean-Philippe Choisis
    Emilie Andrieu
    David Sheeren
    Sylvie Ladet
    Marc Deconchat
    Floriane Clément
    Diane Esquerré
    Clelia Sirami
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34 : 1653 - 1673