Barriers and enablers in primary care clinicians' management of osteoarthritis: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis

被引:9
|
作者
Egerton, T. [1 ]
Diamond, L. [1 ]
Buchbinder, R. [2 ,3 ]
Bennell, K. [1 ]
Slade, S. C. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Exercise & Sports Med Med Dent & Hlth Sc, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] Cabrini Hosp, Monash Dept Clin Epidemiol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 05期
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
PRIMARY CARE; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE INTERVENTIONS; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; HIP; RECOMMENDATIONS; DOMAINS; HAND; PAIN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011618
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent and disabling condition. Primary care management of osteoarthritis is generally suboptimal despite evidence for several modestly effective interventions and the availability of high-quality clinical practice guidelines. This report describes a planned study to synthesise the views of primary care clinicians on the barriers and enablers to following recommended management of osteoarthritis, with the aim of providing new interpretations that may facilitate the uptake of recommended treatments, and in turn improve patient care. Methods and analysis A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. 5 databases will be searched using key search terms for qualitative research, evidence-based practice, clinical practice guidelines, osteoarthritis, beliefs, perceptions, barriers, enablers and adherence. A priori inclusion/exclusion criteria include availability of data from primary care clinicians, reports on views regarding management of osteoarthritis, and studies using qualitative methods for both data collection and analysis. At least 2 independent reviewers will identify eligible reports, conduct a critical appraisal of study conduct, extract data and synthesise reported findings and interpretations. Synthesis will follow thematic analysis within a grounded theory framework of inductive coding and iterative theme identification. The reviewers plus co-authors will contribute to the meta-synthesis to find new themes and theories. The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) approach will be used to determine a confidence profile of each finding from the meta-synthesis. The protocol has been registered on PROSPERO and is reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required. The systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The results will help to inform policy and practice and assist in the optimisation of management for people with osteoarthritis. PROSPERO registration number CRD42015027543.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Barriers and facilitators to physical activity in people with hip or knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence
    Kanavaki, Archontissa M.
    Rushton, Alison
    Klocke, Rainer
    Abhishek, Abhishek
    Duda, Joan L.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (11):
  • [12] Barriers and Enablers to Advance Care Planning with Patients in Primary Care: A Survey of Clinicians
    Howard, Michelle
    Bernard, Carrie
    Klein, Doug
    Tan, Amy
    Slaven, Marissa
    Barwich, Doris
    You, John J.
    Asselin, Gabriel
    Simon, Jessica
    Heyland, Daren K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 52 (06) : E47 - E47
  • [13] Barriers to effective management of type 2 diabetes in primary care: qualitative systematic review
    Rushforth, Bruno
    McCrorie, Carolyn
    Glidewell, Liz
    Midgley, Eleanor
    Foy, Robbie
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 66 (643): : E114 - E127
  • [14] Barriers to primary care clinician adherence to clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain: protocol of a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
    Slade, Susan C.
    Kent, Peter
    Bucknall, Tracey
    Molloy, Elizabeth
    Patel, Shilpa
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (04):
  • [15] Kangaroo mother care: a systematic review of barriers and enablers
    Chan, Grace J.
    Labar, Amy S.
    Wall, Stephen
    Atun, Rifat
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2016, 94 (02) : 130 - 141
  • [16] Barriers and enablers influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of a biopsychosocial approach to musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis
    Ng, Wendy
    Slater, Helen
    Starcevich, Cobie
    Wright, Anthony
    Mitchell, Tim
    Beales, Darren
    [J]. PAIN, 2021, 162 (08) : 2154 - 2185
  • [17] Barriers and enablers of quality high-acuity neonatal care in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a synthesis of qualitative evidence
    Mersha, Abera
    Demissie, Asresash
    Nemera, Gugsa
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [18] Enablers and barriers of people with chronic musculoskeletal pain for engaging in telehealth interventions: protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis
    Lívia G. Fernandes
    Hemakumar Devan
    Steven J. Kamper
    Christopher M. Williams
    Bruno T. Saragiotto
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [19] Enablers and barriers of people with chronic musculoskeletal pain for engaging in telehealth interventions: protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis
    Fernandes, Livia G.
    Devan, Hemakumar
    Kamper, Steven J.
    Williams, Christopher M.
    Saragiotto, Bruno T.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [20] Barriers and enablers to detection and management of chronic kidney disease in primary healthcare: a systematic review
    Neale, Elizabeth P.
    Middleton, Justin
    Lambert, Kelly
    [J]. BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 21 (01)