Barriers and enablers in primary care clinicians' management of osteoarthritis: protocol for a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis

被引:9
|
作者
Egerton, T. [1 ]
Diamond, L. [1 ]
Buchbinder, R. [2 ,3 ]
Bennell, K. [1 ]
Slade, S. C. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Exercise & Sports Med Med Dent & Hlth Sc, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[3] Cabrini Hosp, Monash Dept Clin Epidemiol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 05期
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
PRIMARY CARE; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE INTERVENTIONS; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; HIP; RECOMMENDATIONS; DOMAINS; HAND; PAIN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011618
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent and disabling condition. Primary care management of osteoarthritis is generally suboptimal despite evidence for several modestly effective interventions and the availability of high-quality clinical practice guidelines. This report describes a planned study to synthesise the views of primary care clinicians on the barriers and enablers to following recommended management of osteoarthritis, with the aim of providing new interpretations that may facilitate the uptake of recommended treatments, and in turn improve patient care. Methods and analysis A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. 5 databases will be searched using key search terms for qualitative research, evidence-based practice, clinical practice guidelines, osteoarthritis, beliefs, perceptions, barriers, enablers and adherence. A priori inclusion/exclusion criteria include availability of data from primary care clinicians, reports on views regarding management of osteoarthritis, and studies using qualitative methods for both data collection and analysis. At least 2 independent reviewers will identify eligible reports, conduct a critical appraisal of study conduct, extract data and synthesise reported findings and interpretations. Synthesis will follow thematic analysis within a grounded theory framework of inductive coding and iterative theme identification. The reviewers plus co-authors will contribute to the meta-synthesis to find new themes and theories. The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) approach will be used to determine a confidence profile of each finding from the meta-synthesis. The protocol has been registered on PROSPERO and is reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required. The systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The results will help to inform policy and practice and assist in the optimisation of management for people with osteoarthritis. PROSPERO registration number CRD42015027543.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review and evidence synthesis of qualitative studies to identify primary care clinicians' barriers and enablers to the management of osteoarthritis
    Egerton, T.
    Diamond, L. E.
    Buchbinder, R.
    Bennell, K. L.
    Slade, S. C.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2017, 25 (05) : 625 - 638
  • [2] BARRIERS AND ENABLERS TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES IN PRIMARY OR COMMUNITY CARE SETTINGS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND QUALITATIVE FRAMEWORK SYNTHESIS
    Cunningham, Joice C.
    Briggs, Andrew M.
    Cottrell, Elizabeth
    Doyle, Frank
    Dziedzic, Krysia
    Finney, Andrew
    Murphy, Paul
    Paskins, Zoe
    Sheridan, Eoin
    Swaithes, Laura
    French, Helen
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 : S220 - S221
  • [3] Clinicians' perceived barriers and enablers to the dietary management of adults with type 2 diabetes in primary care: A systematic review
    Boocock, Ruth C.
    Lake, Amelia A.
    Haste, Anna
    Moore, Helen J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2021, 34 (06) : 1042 - 1052
  • [4] Understanding the barriers and enablers of pharmacogenomic testing in primary care: a qualitative systematic review with meta-aggregation synthesis
    Qureshi, Sadaf
    Latif, Asam
    Condon, Laura
    Akyea, Ralph K.
    Kai, Joe
    Qureshi, Nadeem
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2021, 23 (02) : 135 - 154
  • [5] Evidence synthesis methodology for questions relating to barriers and enablers in health care: a scoping review protocol
    Lizarondo, Lucylynn
    Stern, Cindy
    Puljak, Livia
    Zhu, Zheng
    Munn, Zachary
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (10) : 2148 - 2156
  • [6] Systematic review of barriers and enablers to the delivery of palliative care by primary care practitioners
    Carey, Mariko L.
    Zucca, Alison C.
    Freund, Megan A. G.
    Bryant, Jamie
    Herrmann, Anne
    Roberts, Bernadette J.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 33 (09) : 1131 - 1145
  • [7] Barriers and enablers to physical activity participation in patients with venous leg ulcers: a systematic review protocol of qualitative evidence
    Qiu, Yunjing
    Osadnik, Christian R.
    Weller, Carolina D.
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (11) : 3155 - 3162
  • [8] Enablers and barriers to implementing collaborative care for anxiety and depression: a systematic qualitative review
    Gritt Overbeck
    Annette Sofie Davidsen
    Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard
    [J]. Implementation Science, 11
  • [9] Enablers and barriers to implementing collaborative care for anxiety and depression: a systematic qualitative review
    Overbeck, Gritt
    Davidsen, Annette Sofie
    Kousgaard, Marius Brostrom
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2016, 11
  • [10] A Review of Barriers and Enablers to Diagnosis and Management of Persons with Dementia in Primary Care
    Aminzadeh, Faranak
    Molnar, Frank J.
    Dalziel, William B.
    Ayotte, Debbie
    [J]. CANADIAN GERIATRICS JOURNAL, 2012, 15 (03): : 85 - 94