Reimbursement decisions in health policy - extending our understanding of the elements of decision-making

被引:15
|
作者
Wirtz, V [1 ]
Cribb, A
Barber, N
机构
[1] Univ London, Sch Pharm, Dept Practice & Policy, London WC1N 1AX, England
[2] Ctr Invest & Sistemas Salud, Inst Nacl Salud Publ, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
[3] Kings Coll London, Ctr Publ Policy Res, London SE1 9NN, England
关键词
health policy; reimbursement; sildenafil; statins; rivastigmine; United Kingdom; National Health Service;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.12.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Previous theoretical and empirical work on health policy decisions about reimbursement focuses on specific rationales such as effectiveness, economic considerations and equal access for equal needs. As reimbursement decisions take place in a social and political context we propose that the analysis of decision-making should incorporate factors, which go beyond those commonly discussed. As an example we chose three health technologies (sildenafil, rivastigmine and statins) to investigate how decisions about reimbursement of medicines are made in the United Kingdom National Health Service and what factors influence these decisions. From face-to-face, in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 20 regional and national policy makers and stakeholders we identified two dimensions of decision-making, which extend beyond the rationales conventionally cited. The first dimension relates to the role of 'subjectivity' or 'the personal' in the decisions, including personal experiences of the condition and excitement about the novelty or potential benefit of the technology-these factors affect what counts as evidence, or how evidence is interpreted, in practice. The second dimension relates to the social and political function of decision-making and broadens what counts as the relevant ends of decision-making to include such things as maintaining relationships, avoiding organisational burden, generating politically and legally defensible decisions and demonstrating the willingness to care. More importantly, we will argue that these factors should not be treated as contaminants of an otherwise rational decision-making. On the contrary we suggest that they seem relevant, reasonable and also of substantial importance in considering in decisionmaking. Complementing the analysis of decision-making about reimbursement by incorporating these factors could increase our understanding and potentially improve decision-making. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 338
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Informing consumer decisions in health care: Implications from decision-making research
    Hibbard, JH
    Slovic, P
    Jewett, JJ
    [J]. MILBANK QUARTERLY, 1997, 75 (03): : 395 - &
  • [42] Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health
    Bavol'ar, Jozef
    Orosova, Ol'ga
    [J]. JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 10 (01): : 115 - 122
  • [43] UNDERSTANDING ABOUT OR - A NEED FOR DECISION-MAKING
    DEETMAN, C
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1966, S 14 : B85 - &
  • [44] From single decisions to sequential choice patterns: Extending the dynamics of value-based decision-making
    Scherbaum, Stefan
    Lade, Steven
    Siegmund, Stefan
    Goschke, Thomas
    Dshemuchadse, Maja
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):
  • [45] Tracking and understanding the utility of Cochrane reviews for public health decision-making
    Armstrong, Rebecca
    Pettman, Tahna
    Burford, Belinda
    Doyle, Jodie
    Waters, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 34 (02) : 309 - 313
  • [46] Understanding ethical decision-making in design
    Corple, Danielle J.
    Zoltowski, Carla B.
    Kenny Feister, Megan
    Buzzanell, Patrice M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2020, 109 (02) : 262 - 280
  • [47] PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING AND EDUCATION DECISION-MAKING
    MANN, D
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION QUARTERLY, 1974, 10 (02) : 1 - 18
  • [48] Understanding farmers' strategic decision-making processes and the implications for biodiversity conservation policy
    Farmar-Bowers, Quentin
    Lane, Ruth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (02) : 1135 - 1144
  • [49] DELAY OF DECISION-MAKING ON PHARMACEUTICAL REIMBURSEMENT IN NORMAL PROCEDURE IN HUNGARY
    Nagy, Z.
    Molnar, M. P.
    Sebestyen, A.
    Kriszbacher, I
    Vas, G.
    Boncz, I
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A365 - A365
  • [50] Leadership Decision-Making and Insights in Higher Education: Making Better Decisions and Making Decisions Better
    Chitpin, Stephanie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY AND LEADERSHIP STUDIES, 2021, 2 (02):