Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012

被引:9
|
作者
White, Arica [1 ]
Miller, Jacqueline [1 ]
Royalty, Janet [1 ]
Ryerson, A. Blythe [1 ]
Benard, Vicki [1 ]
Helsel, William [2 ]
Kammerer, William [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[2] Informat Management Serv Inc, Calverton, MD USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Mammography; Screening; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s10552-015-0567-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) enrolls asymptomatic women for cancer screening and symptomatic women for diagnostic services. This study describes the results of mammograms provided by the NBCCEDP, by examination indication (screening or diagnostic), and by age group. For the first NBCCEDP-funded mammogram received during 2009-2012, we calculated age-specific percentages of abnormal findings, rates of follow-up testing, and invasive and in situ breast cancer diagnoses per 1,000 mammograms. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds for each of these outcomes by examination indication. The NBCCEDP provided 941,649 screening, 175,310 diagnostic, and 30,434 unknown indication mammograms to 1,147,393 women. The percentage with abnormal mammograms was higher for diagnostic mammograms (40.1 %) than for screening mammograms (15.5 %). Compared with women aged 40-49 years, fewer women aged 50-64 years had abnormal results for screening (13.7 vs. 19.7 %) and diagnostic mammograms (37.7 vs. 42.7 %). Follow-up rates per 1,000 mammograms were lower among women aged 50-64 compared to those aged 40-49 (screening: 143.9 vs. 207.5; diagnostic: 645.3 vs. 760.9); biopsy rates exhibited a similar pattern (screening: 24.1 vs. 32.9; diagnostic: 167.7 vs. 169.7). For screening mammograms, older women had more cancers detected than younger women (invasive: 3.6 vs. 2.2; in situ: 2.3 vs. 2.0). Similarly, for diagnostic mammograms, cancer detection was higher for older women (invasive: 67.8 vs. 36.6; in situ: 17.4 vs. 11.1). Abnormal mammograms and diagnostic follow-up procedures were less frequent in women aged 50-64 years compared to women aged 40-49 years, while breast cancer detection was higher, regardless of indication for the mammogram. Some of these differences between age groups were greater for screening mammograms than for diagnostic mammograms. Cancer detection rates were higher for diagnostic mammograms compared with screening mammograms. These findings support the NBCCEDP's priority of serving women aged 50-64 years and providing both screening and diagnostic mammograms.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 732
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The national breast and cervical cancer early detection program: Report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women
    May, DS
    Lee, NC
    Nadel, MR
    Henson, RM
    Miller, DS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [22] Surgical and systemic management of stage IV breast cancer in the National Cancer Database (2009-2012)
    Adesoye, Taiwo
    Schumacher, Jessica
    Greenberg, Caprice
    Steiman, Jennifer
    Neuman, Heather
    Wilke, Lee
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 : 288 - 289
  • [23] Cervical screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1995-2001
    Benard, VB
    Eheman, CR
    Lawson, HW
    Blackman, DK
    Anderson, C
    Helsel, W
    Thames, SF
    Lee, NC
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (03): : 564 - 571
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program
    Rim, Sun Hee
    Allaire, Benjamin T.
    Ekwueme, Donatus U.
    Miller, Jacqueline W.
    Subramanian, Sujha
    Hall, Ingrid J.
    Hoerger, Thomas J.
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2019, 30 (08) : 819 - 826
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program
    Sun Hee Rim
    Benjamin T. Allaire
    Donatus U. Ekwueme
    Jacqueline W. Miller
    Sujha Subramanian
    Ingrid J. Hall
    Thomas J. Hoerger
    [J]. Cancer Causes & Control, 2019, 30 : 819 - 826
  • [26] Comparing Breast Cancer Outcomes Between Medicaid and the Ohio Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program
    Koroukian, Siran M.
    Bakaki, Paul M.
    Schluchter, Mark
    Owusu, Cynthia
    Cooper, Gregory S.
    Flocke, Susan A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2015, 11 (06) : 478 - +
  • [27] Erratum to: Cervical cancer screening of underserved women in the United States: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1997–2012
    Florence K. L. Tangka
    David H. Howard
    Janet Royalty
    Lucinda P. Dalzell
    Jacqueline Miller
    Brett J. O’Hara
    Susan A. Sabatino
    Kristy Joseph
    Kristy Kenney
    Gery P. Guy
    Ingrid J. Hall
    [J]. Cancer Causes & Control, 2015, 26 : 687 - 687
  • [28] Cancer Screening Practices Among Physicians in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program
    Benard, Vicki B.
    Saraiya, Mona S.
    Soman, Ashwini
    Roland, Katherine B.
    Yabroff, K. Robin
    Miller, Jackie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2011, 20 (10) : 1479 - 1484
  • [29] The Reach and Health Impacts of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program FORWARD
    Guy, Gery P., Jr.
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Hall, Ingrid J.
    Miller, Jacqueline W.
    Royalty, Janet
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2015, 26 (05) : 649 - 650
  • [30] Identifying promising practices for evaluation: the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program
    Amy DeGroff
    Karen Cheung
    Nicola Dawkins-Lyn
    Mary Ann Hall
    Stephanie Melillo
    Rebecca Glover-Kudon
    [J]. Cancer Causes & Control, 2015, 26 : 767 - 774