Remifentanil versus fentanyl for intravenous patient-controlled labour analgesia: an observational study

被引:1
|
作者
Marwah, Radhika [1 ]
Hassan, Samah [1 ]
Carvalho, Jose C. A. [1 ]
Balki, Mrinalini [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
关键词
PAIN RELIEF; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; MEPERIDINE; PHARMACOKINETICS;
D O I
10.1007/s12630-011-9625-0
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose We undertook a retrospective study to compare the analgesic efficacy and effects on neonatal outcome of administering either remifentanil or fentanyl intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) during labour. Methods A five-year retrospective cohort study was undertaken of women with more than 24 weeks of gestation who had received either IVPCA remifentanil or fentanyl for labour analgesia at Mount Sinai Hospital. The sampling timeframe was from November 2005 to March 2010. The standard IVPCA regimen for the remifentanil group consisted of a PCA bolus 0.25 mu g.kg(-1) with a lockout interval of two minutes, a four-hour limit of 3 mg, and a background infusion of 0.025-0.05 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1), whereas the standard IVPCA regimen for the fentanyl group consisted of a PCA bolus 25-50 mu g with a lockout interval of three to six minutes and a four-hour limit of 1-1.5 mg. The following data were compared: maternal hourly pain scores (verbal pain score scale 0-10), sedation scores (scale 0-3), adverse effects, and neonatal outcomes. Mixed linear modelling was used to analyze longitudinal data on pain scores over time. The exact Wilcoxon test and the Fisher's exact test were used for other comparisons. Results Ninety-eight women were studied. There was no significant difference in the model-adjusted pain scores between the two groups (P = 0.86). There was a moderate decrease in pain scores in both groups compared with the baseline values. There was no difference in maternal side effects between the two groups, although transient oxygen desaturation was observed more frequently in the remifentanil group than in the fentanyl group (13% vs 2%, respectively; odds ratio, 7.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 63.3). A larger number of neonates in the fentanyl group required resuscitation compared with neonates in the remifentanil group (59% vs 25%, respectively; odds ratio, 4.33; 95% CI, 1.75 to 10.76); adjusted (44% vs 8%, respectively; odds ratio, 8.56; 95% CI, 2.17 to 33.77). Conclusions Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with either remifentanil or fentanyl provides a moderate degree of labour analgesia, whereas transient maternal oxygen desaturation is observed more commonly with remifentanil. Fentanyl is associated with a higher need for neonatal resuscitation.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 254
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia pumps for labour analgesia in a small obstetric unit
    Agius, C.
    Backe, S.
    Coley, S.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 : 8 - 8
  • [42] Comparison of patient-controlled analgesia and sedation (PCAS) with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol for colonoscopy
    Song, Hua-Yong
    Shen, Li-Jing
    Sun, Wen
    Zhang, Lu-Di
    Liang, Jian-Guo
    Zhang, Guang-Xin
    Lu, Xin-Qing
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (15) : E37411
  • [43] Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labor
    Butwick, A
    Carvalho, B
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (01): : 333 - 333
  • [44] Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia versus intramuscular pethidine for pain relief in labour: the RESPITE randomised controlled trial
    Daniels, J.
    MacArthur, C.
    Hewitt, C.
    Handley, K.
    Smith, F. G.
    Beeson, L.
    Daniels, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 128 - 128
  • [45] Timing of intravenous patient-controlled remifentanil bolus during early labour
    Volmanen, P. V. E.
    Akural, E. I.
    Raudaskoski, T.
    Ranta, P.
    Tekay, A.
    Ohtonen, P.
    Alahuhta, S.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2011, 55 (04) : 486 - 494
  • [46] Patient-controlled analgesia in labour
    Thurlow, JA
    Waterhouse, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 85 (01) : 177 - 177
  • [47] Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia labour: a survey of UK practice
    Saravanakumar, K.
    Garstang, J. S.
    Hasan, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2007, 16 (03) : 221 - 225
  • [48] Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia remifentanil for labor analgesia: time to stop, think and reconsider
    Van de Velde, Marc
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 28 (03) : 237 - 239
  • [49] A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Respiratory Effects of Patient-Controlled Intravenous Remifentanil Analgesia and Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia in Laboring Women
    Stocki, Daniel
    Matot, Idit
    Einav, Sharon
    Eventov-Friedman, Smadar
    Ginosar, Yehuda
    Weiniger, Carolyn F.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2014, 118 (03): : 589 - 597
  • [50] Transdermal Fentanyl Patches Versus Patient-Controlled Intravenous Morphine Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management
    Ebrahimzadeh, Mohamad Hossein
    Mousavi, Seyed Kamal
    Ashraf, Hami
    Abubakri, Rahil
    Birjandinejad, Ali
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 16 (05)