Ergonomic temperature limits for handheld electronic devices

被引:0
|
作者
Berhe, Mulugeta K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Intel Corp, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
关键词
UMPC; ergonomic temperature limits; device power; skin temperature; blood flow; Pennes equation; heat flow; human hand; comfort rating; handheld electronic devices; CFD;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
In the drive towards smaller but more powerful electronic systems, effective thermal management issues continue to be among the key challenges facing the electronic industry. With this drive comes increasing heat production that must be removed for a satisfactory and safe operation. In large systems, one of the main challenges is how to achieve acceptable junction temperature of components such as microprocessors. In small systems such as handheld devices, however, one of the main challenges is maintaining the enclosure temperature below certain threshold so that they can be handled and operated without much discomfort. Whether the device is cooled passively or actively, a portion of the total heat generated by components is dissipated through the enclosure. This heat is then dissipated from the skin by radiation and natural convection into the ambient, and by conduction into any body that is in touch with it. So, when a device is held by hand, part of the heat produced will flow into the hand by conduction. The higher the temperature of the enclosure, the greater the heat transfer into the hand will be. Thus, whereas some devices feel cool to the touch, others will feel hot when touched. In order to characterize touch comfort, we must answer some basic questions: What determines whether a device feels hot or not? That is, what are the variables that control touch comfort? Is there a maximum skin temperature limit that we can say is acceptable for touch comfort? In this paper, we shall attempt to answer these and related questions. Among the results we report in this paper include that touch comfort not only depends on the absolute enclosure temperature of the device but also on the thermal conductivity of the enclosure. Materials with high conductivity transfer greater amount of heat into the hand than materials with low conductivity. Thus, a device with aluminum enclosure will feel hotter when touched than a device with plastic enclosure dissipating the same amount of heat. Further, depending on enclosure material type and ambient conditions, one can identify a skin temperature limit beyond which touch comfort deteriorates and becomes unacceptable. For the form factor studied, it was determined that the skin temperature limit for a plastic enclosure was about 45 C, and for aluminum enclosure it was about 41 C.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1047
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pac-Man on a vape: electronic cigarettes that target youth as handheld multimedia and gaming devices
    Wong, Man
    Talbot, Prue
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2024,
  • [42] Extending the Limits of Wireless Power Transfer to Miniaturized Implantable Electronic Devices
    Dinis, Hugo
    Colmiais, Ivo
    Mendes, Paulo Mateus
    MICROMACHINES, 2017, 8 (12):
  • [43] Assessing the accommodation response after near visual tasks using different handheld electronic devices
    Moulakaki, Aikaterini I.
    Recchioni, Alberto
    Del Aguila-Carrasco, Antonio J.
    Esteve-Taboada, Jose J.
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2017, 80 (01) : 9 - 13
  • [44] Development of Low-Temperature Drop Shock Resistant Solder Alloys for Handheld Devices
    Ribas, Morgana
    Chegudi, Sujatha
    Kumar, Anil
    Pandher, Ranjit
    Raut, Rahul
    Mukherjee, Sutapa
    Sarkar, Siuli
    Singh, Bawa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 IEEE 15TH ELECTRONICS PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE (EPTC 2013), 2013, : 48 - 52
  • [45] Non-Standard Devices for Determination of Temperature Flammability Limits
    Alexeev, S. G.
    Alexeev, K. S.
    Smirnov, V. V.
    Barbin, N. M.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL CHEMISTRY, 2021, 91 (SUPPL 1) : S1 - S12
  • [46] Testing the Temperature Limits of GaN-Based HEMT Devices
    Maier, David
    Alomari, Mohammed
    Grandjean, Nicolas
    Carlin, Jean-Francois
    di Forte-Poisson, Marie-Antoinette
    Dua, Christian
    Chuvilin, Andrey
    Troadec, David
    Gaquiere, Christophe
    Kaiser, Ute
    Delage, Sylvain L.
    Kohn, Erhard
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DEVICE AND MATERIALS RELIABILITY, 2010, 10 (04) : 427 - 436
  • [47] Non-Standard Devices for Determination of Temperature Flammability Limits
    S. G. Alexeev
    K. S. Alexeev
    V. V. Smirnov
    N. M. Barbin
    Russian Journal of General Chemistry, 2021, 91 : S1 - S12
  • [48] Ergonomic control strategies for a handheld force-controlled ultrasound probe
    Gilbertson, Matthew W.
    Anthony, Brian W.
    2012 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2012, : 1284 - 1291
  • [49] Ergonomic handheld OCT angiography probe optimized for pediatric and supine imaging
    Viehland, Christian
    Chen, Xi
    Du Tran-Viet
    Jackson-Atogi, Moseph
    Ortiz, Pablo
    Waterman, Gar
    Vajzovic, Lejla
    Toth, Cynthia A.
    Izatt, Joseph A.
    BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2019, 10 (05) : 2623 - 2638
  • [50] An Ergonomic Handheld Ultrasound Probe providing Contact Forces and Pose Information
    Noh, Yohan
    Housden, R. James
    Gomez, Alberto
    Knight, Caroline
    Garcia, Francesca
    Liu, Hongbin
    Razavi, Reza
    Rhode, Kawal
    Althoefer, Kaspar
    2015 37TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2015, : 5773 - 5776