Validation of automated complex head and neck treatment planning with pencil beam scanning proton therapy

被引:0
|
作者
Hedrick, Samantha Grace [1 ]
Petro, Scott [1 ]
Ward, Alex [1 ]
Morris, Bart [1 ]
机构
[1] Provis CARES Proton Therapy Ctr, 6450 Provis Cares Way, Knoxville, TN 37909 USA
来源
关键词
automated planning; H&N; PBS; proton therapy; scripting; MULTIFIELD OPTIMIZATION; ROBUSTNESS; QUALITY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13510
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy offers dosimetric advantages for several treatment sites, including head and neck (H&N). However, to achieve the optimal target coverage and robustness, these plans can be complex and time consuming to develop and optimize. Automating the treatment planning process can ensure a high-quality and standardized plan, reduce burden to the planner, and decrease time-to-treatment. We utilized in-house scripting to automate a four-field multi-field optimization (MFO) H&N planning technique. Methods and materials Ten bilateral H&N patients were planned in RayStation v6 with a four-field modified-X beam configuration using MFO planning. Automation included creation of avoidance structures to control spot placement and development of standardized beams, PBS spot settings, robust optimization objectives, and patient-specific predicted planning constraints. Each patient was planned both with and without automation to evaluate differences in planning time, perceived effort and plan quality, plan robustness, and OAR sparing. Results On average, scripted plans required 3.2 h, compared to 4.3 h without the script. There was no difference in target coverage or plan robustness with or without automation. Automation significantly reduced mean dose to the oral cavity, parotids, esophagus, trachea, and larynx. Perceived effort was scaled from 1 (minimum effort) to 100 (maximum effort), and automation reduced perceived effort by 42% (p < 0.05). Two non-scripted plans required re-planning due to errors. Conclusions Automation of this multi-beam, the MFO proton planning process reduced planning time and improved OAR sparing compared to the same planning process without scripting. Scripting generation of complex structures and planning objectives reduced burden on the planner. With most current treatment planning software, this automation is simple to implement and can standardize quality of care across all treatment planners.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robustness Evaluation of Head and Neck Treatment with Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Technique
    Lin, H.
    Liu, H.
    Liang, X.
    Lin, A.
    Ahn, P.
    Zhai, H.
    Kirk, M.
    Kassaee, A.
    McDonough, J.
    Both, S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S444 - S445
  • [2] Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Pregnant Patients With Brain and Head and Neck Cancers
    Dupere, Justine M.
    Lucido, John J.
    Breen, William G.
    Mahajan, Anita
    Stafford, Scott L.
    Bradley, Thomas B.
    Blackwell, Charles R.
    Remmes, Nicholas B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2024, 118 (03): : 853 - 858
  • [3] Initial Experience with a Head and Neck RapidPlan Model for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    McConnell, K.
    Snider, J.
    Nemec, J.
    Cardan, R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [4] Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Adolescents and Young Adults with Head and Neck Sarcomas
    Vazquez, Miriam
    Baust, Katja
    Ilundain, Amaia
    Leiser, Dominic
    Bachtiary, Barbara
    Pica, Alessia
    Kliebsch, Ulrike L.
    Calaminus, Gabriele
    Weber, Damien C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2023, 10 (02) : 73 - 84
  • [5] A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy
    Langner, Ulrich W.
    Mundis, Michelle
    Strauss, Dan
    Zhu, Mingyao
    Mossahebi, Sina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (01): : 156 - 163
  • [6] Clinical Outcome of AYAs with Head and Neck Sarcomas after Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Vazquez, M.
    Ilundain, A.
    Leiser, D.
    Bachtiary, B.
    Pica, A.
    Kliebsch, U. L.
    Weber, D. C.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S279 - S280
  • [7] Effects of Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Spot Size on Head and Neck Treatment Plan Quality
    Mundy, D.
    Foote, R. L.
    Beltran, C.
    Herman, M. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E603 - E603
  • [8] Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy
    Halthore, Aditya
    Fellows, Zachary
    Tran, Anh
    Deville, Curtiland, Jr.
    Wright, Jean L.
    Meyer, Jeffrey
    Li, Heng
    Sheikh, Khadija
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2023, 9 (03) : 40 - 49
  • [9] Robust Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Treatment Planning for Rectal Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Kiely, Janid Patricia Blanco
    White, Benjamin M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 208 - 215
  • [10] Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy
    Halthore, Aditya
    Fellows, Zachary
    Tran, Anh
    Deville Jr, Curtiland
    Wright, Jean L.
    Meyer, Jeffrey
    Li, Heng
    Sheikh, Khadija
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2022,