Robust Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Treatment Planning for Rectal Cancer Radiation Therapy

被引:5
|
作者
Kiely, Janid Patricia Blanco [1 ]
White, Benjamin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, 3400 Civ Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; TREATMENT UNCERTAINTIES; OXALIPLATIN; SENSITIVITY; TRIAL; BOWEL; INTRAFRACTION; TOXICITY; ACCOUNT; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.037
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate, in a treatment plan design and robustness study, whether proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) has the potential to offer advantages, relative to inter-fraction uncertainties, over photon volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in a locally advanced rectal cancer patient population. Methods and Materials: Ten patients received a planning CT scan, followed by an average of 4 weekly offline CT verification CT scans, which were rigidly co-registered to the planning CT. Clinical PBS plans were generated on the planning CT, using a single-field uniform-dose technique with single-posterior and parallel-opposed (LAT) fields geometries. The VMAT plans were generated on the planning CT using 2 6-MV, 220 degrees coplanar arcs. Clinical plans were forward-calculated on verification CTs to assess robustness relative to anatomic changes. Setup errors were assessed by forward-calculating clinical plans with a +/- 5-mm (left-right, anterior-posterior, superior-inferior) isocenter shift on the planning CT. Differences in clinical target volume and organ at risk dose-volume histogram (DHV) indicators between plans were tested for significance using an appropriate Wilcoxon test (P<.05). Results: Dosimetrically, PBS plans were statistically different from VMAT plans, showing greater organ at risk sparing. However, the bladder was statistically identical among LAT and VMAT plans. The clinical target volume coverage was statistically identical among all plans. The robustness test found that all DVH indicators for PBS and VMAT plans were robust, except the LAT's genitalia (V5, V35). The verification CT plans showed that all DVH indicators were robust. Conclusions: Pencil beam scanning plans were found to be as robust as VMAT plans relative to interfractional changes during treatment when posterior beam angles and appropriate range margins are used. Pencil beam scanning dosimetric gains in the bowel (V15, V20) over VMAT suggest that using PBS to treat rectal cancer may reduce radiation treatment-related toxicity. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 215
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proton Pencil Beam Scanning for Rectal Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Kiely, J. P. Blanco
    White, B. M.
    Plastaras, J. P.
    Ben-Josef, E.
    Varman, C.
    Tang, S.
    Tochner, Z. A.
    Metz, J. M.
    Both, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E159 - E159
  • [2] Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer
    Dionisi, F.
    Batra, S.
    Kirk, M.
    Both, S.
    Vennarini, S.
    McDonough, J.
    Metz, J. M.
    Plastaras, J. P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S341 - S342
  • [3] Robust treatment planning in whole pelvis pencil beam scanning proton therapy for prostate cancer
    Butala, Anish A.
    Ingram, W. Scott
    O'Reilly, Shannon E.
    Hartl, Brett
    Kassaee, Ali
    Deville, Curtiland
    Vapiwala, Neha
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (04) : 334 - 338
  • [4] Pencil beam scanning proton therapy vs rotational arc radiation therapy: A treatment planning comparison for postoperative oropharyngeal cancer
    Apinorasethkul, Ontida
    Kirk, Maura
    Teo, Kevin
    Swisher-McClure, Samuel
    Lukens, John N.
    Lin, Alexander
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2017, 42 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [5] Strategies for Motion Robust Proton Therapy With Pencil Beam Scanning for Esophageal Cancer
    Moller, Ditte Sloth
    Poulsen, Per Rugaard
    Hagner, Andreas
    Dufour, Mathieu
    Nordsmark, Marianne
    Nyeng, Tine Bisballe
    Mortensen, Hanna Rahbek
    Lutz, Christina Maria
    Hoffmann, Lone
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (02): : 539 - 548
  • [6] A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy
    Langner, Ulrich W.
    Mundis, Michelle
    Strauss, Dan
    Zhu, Mingyao
    Mossahebi, Sina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (01): : 156 - 163
  • [7] A Robust Treatment Planning Technique for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Cranial Spinal Irradiation
    Zhu, M.
    Yam, M.
    Mehta, M.
    Badiyan, S.
    Young, K.
    Malyapa, R.
    Regine, W.
    Langen, K.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3505 - 3505
  • [8] Robust Evaluation of Treatment Planning Techniques in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Cranio-Spinal Irradiation
    Rana, S.
    Romaguera, T.
    Gutierrez, A.
    Bennouna, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2866 - 2867
  • [9] Robust optimization for IMPT of pencil-beam scanning proton therapy for prostate cancer
    Brouwer, C. L.
    Matysiak, W. P.
    Klinker, P.
    Spijkerman-Bergsma, M.
    Hammer, C.
    Van den Bergh, A. C. M.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    Scandurra, D.
    Korevaar, E. W.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S835 - S836
  • [10] Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy
    Halthore, Aditya
    Fellows, Zachary
    Tran, Anh
    Deville, Curtiland, Jr.
    Wright, Jean L.
    Meyer, Jeffrey
    Li, Heng
    Sheikh, Khadija
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2023, 9 (03) : 40 - 49