Effects of the suspension interconnect on ESD failures of the head stack assemblies

被引:1
|
作者
Jang, EK [1 ]
Lee, HJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Samsung Informat Syst Amer, HDD R&D, San Jose, CA 95134 USA
关键词
crosstalk; electrostatic discharge (ESD); giant magnetoresistive (GMR); hard disk drive; interconnect; magnetic heads; preamplifier; slider;
D O I
10.1109/TMAG.2003.821176
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
With increasing recording density and shrinking size of giant magnetoresistive (GMR) read/write heads, the GMR sensor is getting more sensitive to electrostatic discharge (ESD) events. In this study, two different types of head stack assembly (Type A and, Type B) were studied in terms of ESD sensitivity. Both head stack assemblies (HSA) consist of head gimbal assemblies (HGA), preamplifier, E-block, flexible printed cable (FPC), voice coil motor (VCM) coil, and 20-pin connector for 3.5-in drive. Type A is a conventional HSA consisting of two, or four HGAs with long tail suspensions whereas Type B is a head stack consisting of one HGA with FPC interconnect instead of a long tail. ESD events were simulated by zapping 20-pin connector with an ESD gun. A quasi-static tester (QST) was used for amplitude and resistance measurement of GMR heads after each ESD event. The test results showed that the failure voltage of Type B (1.0-1.2 kV) is much lower than Type A (4.0-5.0 kV). Furthermore, failed HSAs showed different failure modes: preamplifier damage for Type A and read sensor damage for Type B. To understand the main reason for low failure voltage for Type B, we investigated ESD sensitivity by modifying Type B with different interconnects, bonding methods, and arm actuator structures. These results indicate that the write-to-read crosstalk of interconnect (from preamplifier to head slider) during ESD events caused low failure voltage for Type B. It was found that the metallic structure surrounding the VCM coil is another cause for the low failure voltage of Type B.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 289
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] ESD testing of head stack assemblies used in magnetic recording hard disk drives
    Wallash, A
    ELECTRICAL OVERSTRESS/ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 1999, : 297 - 301
  • [2] Laser processing to adjust the suspension preload of magnetic recording head stack assemblies
    Singh, GP
    Brown, BR
    Werlich, H
    Kozlovsky, W
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2000, 36 (05) : 2724 - 2726
  • [3] A study of head stack assembly sensitivity to ESD
    Boone, W
    Himle, J
    Porter, T
    Ferry, B
    ELECTRICAL OVERSTRESS/ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 1999, : 373 - 379
  • [4] ESD damage of GMR sensors at head stack assembly
    Zeng, RB
    Qun, Y
    Zhao, FG
    Tian, H
    ELECTRICAL OVERSTRESS/ELECTROSTATIC DISCHARGE SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 1999, : 380 - 384
  • [5] Response of head suspension interconnect at 1 GHz
    George, Peter K.
    Jury, Jason
    Judy, Jack H.
    IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1999, 35 (5 pt 1): : 2247 - 2249
  • [6] Response of head suspension interconnect at 1 GHz
    George, PK
    Jury, J
    Judy, JH
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1999, 35 (05) : 2247 - 2249
  • [7] HEAD SUSPENSION ASSEMBLIES WITH INTERNALLY PRELOADED DIMPLE.
    Nayak, J.H.
    IBM technical disclosure bulletin, 1983, 26 (06): : 2920 - 2921
  • [8] Topology optimization of head suspension assemblies for suppressing head Lift-off
    G. K. Lau
    H. Du
    Microsystem Technologies, 2004, 10 : 671 - 679
  • [9] Topology optimization of head suspension assemblies for suppressing head Lift-off
    Lau, GK
    Du, H
    MICROSYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES-MICRO-AND NANOSYSTEMS-INFORMATION STORAGE AND PROCESSING SYSTEMS, 2004, 10 (8-9): : 671 - 679
  • [10] THE EFFECTS OF INTERCONNECT PROCESS AND SNAPBACK VOLTAGE ON THE ESD FAILURE THRESHOLD OF NMOS TRANSISTORS
    CHEN, KL
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 1988, 35 (12) : 2140 - 2150