Safety and Feasibility of Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy as Augmentative Therapy after Prior Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis

被引:16
|
作者
Strong, Andrew T. [1 ,3 ]
Rodriguez, John [1 ,3 ]
Kroh, Matthew [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ponsky, Jeffrey [1 ,3 ]
Cline, Michael [2 ,3 ]
El-Hayek, Kevin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Gen Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
PYLOROPLASTY; VALIDATION; SEVERITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: For medically refractory diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis, gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is an excellent option for symptom control; however, a small subset of patients may develop recurrent or persistent symptoms. Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP, also described by some authors as gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy or G-POEM) is an emerging therapy for medically refractory gastroparesis. This study investigated the safety and feasibility of POP after previous GES for recurrent or persistent gastroparesis. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively identified all patients undergoing POP between January 2016 and December 2017, with GES in situ. Patient characteristics, gastroparesis etiology, and procedural data were collected. Symptoms were assessed with the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) both before and 30 to 90 days after POP. Standard pre- and post-procedure 4-hour gastric emptying tests were obtained when available. RESULTS: There were 22 patients who met inclusion criteria (81.8% female, mean age 42.3 +/- 12.4 years). Causes of gastroparesis were diabetes in 38.1%, and idiopathic in 61.9%. The average time since GES insertion was 3.45 years. Mean preoperative 4-hour gastric retention was 50.1%. Most POP procedures were performed in the operating room (90.9%), with mean operative time of 40 minutes and a 1.4-day length of stay. There were 4 readmissions within 30 days, but no POP-related complications. Overall, GCSI improved by an absolute reduction of 1.63 points (p = 0.002), with significant improvements in all sub-scores. Of 11 patients with post-procedural motility or emptying studies available, 7 were normal. CONCLUSIONS: Per-oral pyloromyotomy appears to be safe and feasible for patients with recurrent gastroparesis symptoms after GES. Both symptoms and motility significantly improved in the shortterm. These data replicate similar data suggesting laparoscopic pyloroplasty as an effective augmentative therapy after GES, but may provide a less invasive option for patients. (C) 2019 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 595
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: Report on the first case performed in Mexico
    Hernandez-Mondragon, O. V.
    Solorzano-Pineda, O. M.
    Blancas-Valencia, J. M.
    Gonzalez-Martinez, M. A.
    Villanueva-Perez, R. M.
    REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO, 2018, 83 (04): : 459 - 461
  • [22] Safety and feasibility of same day discharge after per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy in refractory gastroparesis: a pilot study
    Shah, Rushikesh
    Chen, Huimin
    Calderon, Lucie F.
    Gooden, Tonia
    Mubashir, Maryam
    Rashid, Shazia
    Raza, Syed Musa
    Derise, Allison
    Mccurdy, Grace
    Sanders, Brenna
    Keilin, Steve
    Cai, Qiang
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 135 (12) : 1432 - 1437
  • [23] Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Post-Surgical Gastroparesis
    Andrew T. Strong
    Joshua P. Landreneau
    Michael Cline
    Matthew D. Kroh
    John H. Rodriguez
    Jeffrey L. Ponsky
    Kevin El-Hayek
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2019, 23 : 1095 - 1103
  • [24] SAFETY AND FEASIBILITY OF SAME DAY DISCHARGE AFTER PER ORAL ENDOSCOPIC PYLOROMYOTOMY IN REFRACTORY GASTROPARESIS: A PILOT STUDY
    Shah, Rushikesh
    Calderon, Lucie
    Li, Xiaoyu
    Alceguire, Kara
    Xie, Mengdan
    Messallam, Ahmed
    Keilin, Steven
    Cai, Qiang
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (06) : AB10 - AB10
  • [25] Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Post-Surgical Gastroparesis
    Strong, Andrew T.
    Landreneau, Joshua P.
    Cline, Michael
    Kroh, Matthew D.
    Rodriguez, John H.
    Ponsky, Jeffrey L.
    El-Hayek, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2019, 23 (06) : 1095 - 1103
  • [26] PER-ORAL PYLOROMYOTOMY (POP) FOR MEDICALLY REFRACTORY POST-SURGICAL GASTROPARESIS
    Strong, Andrew T.
    Landreneau, Joshua P.
    Cline, Michael S.
    Kroh, Matthew
    Rodriguez, John
    Ponsky, Jeffrey L.
    El-Hayek, Kevin M.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S1264 - S1265
  • [27] Safety and feasibility of same day discharge after per oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy in refractory gastroparesis: a pilot study
    Shah Rushikesh
    Chen Huimin
    Calderon Lucie F.
    Gooden Tonia
    Mubashir Maryam
    Rashid Shazia
    Raza Syed Musa
    Derise Allison
    Mccurdy Grace
    Sanders Brenna
    Keilin Steve
    Cai Qiang
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2022, 135 (12) : 1432 - 1437
  • [28] Per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy and per-oral endoscopic myotomy for coexisting refractory gastroparesis and recurrent achalasia cardia in a single patient
    Bapaye, Amol
    Mahadik, Mahesh
    Pujari, Rajendra
    Vyas, Viral
    Dubale, Nachiket
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 84 (04) : 734 - 735
  • [29] Outcomes after per oral pyloromyotomy based on gastroparesis etiology
    Khan, Saher-Zahra
    Chambers, Kelly
    Benson, Jamie
    Boutros, Christina
    Wieland, Patrick
    Chatha, Hamza Nasir
    Katz, Guy
    Lyons, Joshua
    Marks, Jeffrey M.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 39 (02): : 1114 - 1119
  • [30] The Efficacy of Gastric Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy for Refractory Gastroparesis
    Boo, Sun-Jin
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 79 (04): : 191 - 193