Safety and Feasibility of Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy as Augmentative Therapy after Prior Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis

被引:16
|
作者
Strong, Andrew T. [1 ,3 ]
Rodriguez, John [1 ,3 ]
Kroh, Matthew [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Ponsky, Jeffrey [1 ,3 ]
Cline, Michael [2 ,3 ]
El-Hayek, Kevin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Gen Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
PYLOROPLASTY; VALIDATION; SEVERITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: For medically refractory diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis, gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is an excellent option for symptom control; however, a small subset of patients may develop recurrent or persistent symptoms. Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP, also described by some authors as gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy or G-POEM) is an emerging therapy for medically refractory gastroparesis. This study investigated the safety and feasibility of POP after previous GES for recurrent or persistent gastroparesis. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively identified all patients undergoing POP between January 2016 and December 2017, with GES in situ. Patient characteristics, gastroparesis etiology, and procedural data were collected. Symptoms were assessed with the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) both before and 30 to 90 days after POP. Standard pre- and post-procedure 4-hour gastric emptying tests were obtained when available. RESULTS: There were 22 patients who met inclusion criteria (81.8% female, mean age 42.3 +/- 12.4 years). Causes of gastroparesis were diabetes in 38.1%, and idiopathic in 61.9%. The average time since GES insertion was 3.45 years. Mean preoperative 4-hour gastric retention was 50.1%. Most POP procedures were performed in the operating room (90.9%), with mean operative time of 40 minutes and a 1.4-day length of stay. There were 4 readmissions within 30 days, but no POP-related complications. Overall, GCSI improved by an absolute reduction of 1.63 points (p = 0.002), with significant improvements in all sub-scores. Of 11 patients with post-procedural motility or emptying studies available, 7 were normal. CONCLUSIONS: Per-oral pyloromyotomy appears to be safe and feasible for patients with recurrent gastroparesis symptoms after GES. Both symptoms and motility significantly improved in the shortterm. These data replicate similar data suggesting laparoscopic pyloroplasty as an effective augmentative therapy after GES, but may provide a less invasive option for patients. (C) 2019 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 595
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety and Feasibility of Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy as an Augmentative Therapy after Prior Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis
    Strong, Andrew T.
    Rodriguez, John H.
    Kroh, Matthew D.
    Ponsky, Jeffrey L.
    Villamere, James P.
    Cline, Michael
    El-Hayek, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 227 (04) : E142 - E143
  • [2] Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy Outcome Disparities in Gastroparesis
    Kim, Hee Kyung
    Decicco, Jamie P.
    Prasad, Rachna
    Alkhatib, Hemasat
    El-Hayek, Kevin M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S41 - S41
  • [3] Gastric electrical stimulation versus per-oral pyloromyotomy for the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with gastroparesis: An observational study of two cohorts
    Gourcerol, Guillaume
    Gonzalez, Jean Michel
    Bonaz, Bruno
    Fontaine, Sebastien
    Zerbib, Frank
    Mion, Francois
    Basile, Paul
    Gillibert, Andre
    Labonde, Amelie
    Soliman, Heithem
    Vitton, Veronique
    Coffin, Benoit
    Jacques, Jeremie
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2023, 35 (07):
  • [4] Association between duration or etiology of gastroparesis and clinical response after gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy
    Mekaroonkamol, Parit
    Patel, Vaishali
    Shah, Rushikesh
    Li, Baiwen
    Luo, Hui
    Shen, Shanshan
    Chen, Huimin
    Shahnavaz, Nikrad
    Dacha, Sunil
    Keilin, Steven
    Willingham, Field F.
    Christie, Jennifer
    Cai, Qiang
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (05) : 969 - 976
  • [5] PER-ORAL ENDOSCOPIC PYLOROMYOTOMY FOR SEVERE REFRACTORY GASTROPARESIS: A FEASIBILITY AND EFFICACY STUDY IN THE NETHERLANDS
    Conchillo, Jose M.
    Straathof, Jan Willem
    Venema, Esmee L.
    Bouvy, Nicole D.
    Masclee, Ad
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S804 - S804
  • [6] Role of Laparoscopic-Assisted Gastric Per-oral Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy in Refractory Gastroparesis
    Jacob Trygve Lambdin
    Steven Zeddun
    Marie L. Borum
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2018, 63 : 1366 - 1366
  • [7] Gastric POEM (endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy): Can it be the answer to postoperative and idiopathic gastroparesis?
    Bapaye, Amol
    Dubale, Nachiket
    Pujari, Rajendra
    Kulkarni, Amol
    Jajoo, Rucha
    Bapaye, Jay
    Thorat, Vinay
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 30 : 306 - 307
  • [8] Long-term Outcome of Gastric Per-Oral Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy in Treatment of Gastroparesis
    Abdelfatah, Mohamed M.
    Noll, Alan
    Kapil, Neil
    Shah, Rushikesh
    Li, Lianyong
    Nustas, Rosemary
    Li, Baiwen
    Luo, Hui
    Chen, Huimin
    Xia, Liang
    Mekaroonkamol, Parit
    Shahnavaz, Nikrad
    Keilin, Steven
    Willingham, Field
    Christie, Jennifer
    Cai, Qiang
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 19 (04) : 816 - 824
  • [9] Role of Laparoscopic-Assisted Gastric Per-oral Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy in Refractory Gastroparesis
    Lambdin, Jacob Trygve
    Zeddun, Steven
    Borum, Marie L.
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2018, 63 (05) : 1366 - 1366
  • [10] Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy versus pyloromyotomy for gastroparesis: An international comparative study
    Pioppo, Lauren
    Reja, Debashis
    Gaidhane, Monica
    Bareket, Romy
    Tawadros, Augustine
    Madrigal Mendez, Ana L.
    Nieto, Jose
    Zamarripa, Felipe
    Guadalupe Martinez, Ma
    Carames, Mine C.
    Carames, Juan C.
    Liu-Burdowski, Jennifer
    Kim, Marina
    Deshmukh, Ameya A.
    Suresh, Supriya
    Alkhiari, Resheed
    Andalib, Iman
    Shahid, Haroon M.
    Sarkar, Avik
    Tyberg, Amy
    Kahaleh, Michel
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 (11) : 3177 - 3182