A branch and price solution approach for order acceptance and capacity planning in make-to-order operations

被引:49
|
作者
Mestry, Siddharth [1 ]
Damodaran, Purushothaman [2 ]
Chen, Chin-Sheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[2] No Illinois Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
关键词
Order acceptance; Branch-and-price; Capacity planning; Make-to-order operations; Large-scale optimization; JOB SELECTION; SHOP;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Make-to-order (MTO) operations have to effectively manage their capacity to make long-term sustainable profits. This objective can be met by selectively accepting available customer orders and simultaneously planning for capacity. We model a MTO operation of a job-shop with multiple resources having regular and non-regular capacity. The MTO firm has a set of customer orders at time zero with fixed due-dates. The process route, processing times, and sales price for each order are given. Since orders compete for limited resources, the firm can only accept some orders. In this paper a Mixed-Integer Linear Program (MILP) is proposed to aid an operational manager to decide which orders to accept and how to allocate resources such that the overall profit is maximized. A branch-and-price (B&P) algorithm is devised to solve the MILP effectively. The MILP is first decomposed into a master problem and several sub-problems using Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition. Each sub-problem is represented as a network flow problem and an exact procedure is proposed to solve the sub-problems efficiently. We also propose an approximate B&P scheme, Lagrangian bounds, and approximations to fathom nodes in the branch-and-bound tree. Computational analysis shows that the proposed B&P algorithm can solve large problem instances with relatively short time. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 495
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Revenue management for a make-to-order company with limited inventory capacity
    Florian Defregger
    Heinrich Kuhn
    [J]. OR Spectrum, 2007, 29 : 137 - 156
  • [42] Revenue management for a make-to-order company with limited inventory capacity
    Defregger, Florian
    Kuhn, Heinrich
    [J]. OR SPECTRUM, 2007, 29 (01) : 137 - 156
  • [43] A DISASSEMBLY CAPABILITY PLANNING MODEL FOR THE MAKE-TO-ORDER REMANUFACTURING SYSTEM
    Cao Huajun
    Du Yanbin
    Liu Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2008, 7 (02) : 329 - 332
  • [44] Static and Dynamic Pricing of Excess Capacity in a Make-to-Order Environment
    Hall, Joseph M.
    Kopalle, Praveen K.
    Pyke, David F.
    [J]. PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 18 (04) : 411 - 425
  • [45] A model for supplier selection and manufacturing planning in make-to-order environment
    Cakravastia, A
    Takahashi, K
    [J]. ICIM' 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH CHINA-JAPAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, : 292 - 297
  • [46] Production planning system for a combination of make-to-stock and make-to-order products
    Tsubone, H
    Ishikawa, Y
    Yamamoto, H
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (18) : 4835 - 4851
  • [47] Capacity coordination in hybrid make-to-stock/make-to-order production environments
    Rafiei, H.
    Rabbani, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (03) : 773 - 789
  • [48] Model for negotiating the price and due date for a single order with multiple suppliers in a make-to-order environment
    Cakravastia, A
    Nakamura, N
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (14) : 3425 - 3440
  • [49] Make-to-order or make-to-stock decision by a novel hybrid approach
    Zaerpour, N.
    Rabbani, M.
    Gharehgozli, A. H.
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2008, 22 (02) : 186 - 201
  • [50] The price of responsiveness: Cost analysis of change orders in make-to-order manufacturing
    Uskonen, Jukka
    Tenhiaelae, Antti
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 135 (01) : 420 - 429