Postgraduate Education of Board Members and R&D Investment-Evidence from China

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Chuanyi [1 ]
Yang, Jiale [1 ]
Cheng, Zhe [1 ]
Ni, Chaoqun [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Educ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Iowa, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
postgraduate education; education level; discipline background; graduation institution; R&D investment; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM; UPPER ECHELONS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; OWNERSHIP; DIRECTORS; DETERMINANTS; ENDOGENEITY; INSTABILITY; AGENCY;
D O I
10.3390/su11226524
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increasing research and development (R&D) investment has been a common strategy to advance the sustainable development of economy and competitiveness across the world. Instead of external determinants, exploring the influence of internal factors such as the characteristics of board members is an important topic, yet under-researched. This article aims to reveal whether a firm's R&D investment is related to the directors' postgraduate education experience. Further, we want to explore whether this relationship shows heterogeneity in different industrial environments. We analyzed information from a sample of 1374 listed companies in China using descriptive statistics, ordinary least square (OLS) regression and instrumental variable (IV) estimation, and came to the following conclusions: First, the percentage of directors with doctorates significantly increases the chance of investing R&D activities. Second, in the second industry, the higher the proportion of postgraduate education degree holder as directors in a firm, the more expenditure the firm invests in R&D activities. Yet, there is no such association in the third industry. Finally, if a capital-driven strategy is adopted, directors with a master's degree tend to reduce R&D investment in IT companies. Findings from this research not only enrich innovation management theory, upper echelon theory, and human capital theory, but also provide insights for corporate governance and national sustainable innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Postgraduate Education of Board Members and R&D Investment-Evidence from China (vol 11, 6524, 2019)
    Wang, Chuanyi
    Yang, Jiale
    Cheng, Zhe
    Ni, Chaoqun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [2] Governmental Education Policy with Private Education Investment-Evidence from China
    Lu, Chen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING (CME 2014), 2014, : 1819 - 1826
  • [3] Environmental regulation and corporate R&D investment-evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Huang, Jingchang
    Zhao, Jing
    Cao, June
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 72 : 154 - 174
  • [4] Board diversity and R&D investment
    Midavaine, Jeanelle
    Dolfsma, Wilfred
    Aalbers, Rick
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2016, 54 (03) : 558 - 569
  • [5] Pay for accounting performance and R&D investment: Evidence from China
    Chen, Shenglan
    Lin, Bingxuan
    Lu, Rui
    Ma, Hui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2016, 44 : 142 - 153
  • [6] Peer effects in R&D investment policy: Evidence from China
    Peng, Zhen
    Lian, Yujun
    Forson, Joseph A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2021, 26 (03) : 4516 - 4533
  • [7] International operations and corporate R&D investment: Evidence from China
    Fu, Ying
    Li, Jiaying
    Wu, Ying
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (09):
  • [8] Business Group Affiliation and R&D Investment: Evidence from China
    Lou, Zhukun
    Chen, Siyu
    Jia, Yingya
    Yu, Xiaoyu
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2021, 57 (08) : 2307 - 2322
  • [9] Intergenerational power gap and R&D investment: Evidence from China
    Zhao, Yong
    Yang, Xi
    Xin, Daqi
    Zhou, Wencang
    Zhang, Shuaijun
    Wang, Liying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2023, 8 (02):
  • [10] Manufacturing R&D investment efficiency and financing constraints: evidence from China
    Guo, Lu
    Long, WeiYa
    Dai, Zhimin
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 53 (06) : 676 - 687