Board diversity and R&D investment

被引:62
|
作者
Midavaine, Jeanelle [1 ]
Dolfsma, Wilfred [2 ,3 ]
Aalbers, Rick [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Sch Econ & Business Innovat Management & Strategy, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Loughborough Univ London, Glendonbrook Inst Enterprise Dev, London, England
[3] Univ Groningen, Sch Business & Econ, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
R&D investment; Board diversity; Board decision making; TOP MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC CHANGE; FIRM SIZE; DEMOGRAPHIC FAULTLINES; TEAM PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; CREATIVITY; CONFLICT; WORK; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1108/MD-09-2014-0574
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of board diversity on the extent to which firms invest in R&D. Design/methodology/approach - Based on data collected about the composition of the board of directors, the authors determine statistically if the characteristics of directors predicts the extent to which firms invest more in R&D. Findings - The authors find, unexpectedly, that tenure diversity lead firms to invest less in R&D, while education diversity and gender diversity makes firms invest more. Gender diversity positively moderates education diversity as well, strengthening the effect found. Research limitations/implications - The sample of firms the authors include in the paper is restricted due to the overwhelming difficulty in collecting data about the composition of boards of directors, and their backgrounds. Practical implications - The paper offers insights into how boards of directors might need to be composed in order to try have firms invest more in R&D. Social implications - Innovative firms are more competitive and more sustainable. Knowing what contributes to a firm's investment in R&D is thus of great social value. Originality/value - The authors include a much larger set of diversity measures than any previously published study, and provide counter-intuitive findings that have implications for practice, society, as well as theory about team composition.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / 569
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] When R&D investment improves firm value: the role of board gender diversity
    Kyaw, Khine
    Khatri, Ishwar
    Treepongkaruna, Sirimon
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [2] Family Ownership, Board Independence, and R&D Investment
    Chen, Hsiang-Lan
    Hsu, Wen-Tsung
    [J]. FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2009, 22 (04) : 347 - 362
  • [3] Board diversity and corporate propensity to R&D spending
    Asad, Muhammad
    Akbar, Saeed
    Li, Jing
    Shah, Syed Zulfiqar Ali
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 89
  • [4] The dual effect of board gender diversity on R&D investments
    Almor, Tamar
    Bazel-Shoham, Ofra
    Lee, Sang Mook
    [J]. LONG RANGE PLANNING, 2022, 55 (02)
  • [5] CEO Tenure and R&D Investment: The Moderating Effect of Board Capital
    Chen, Hsiang-Lan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2013, 49 (04): : 437 - 459
  • [6] Do tenure and age of board chair matter for R&D investment?
    Azzam, Ala'a
    Alhababsah, Salem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2022,
  • [7] Board Capital, CEO Power and R&D Investment in Electronics Firms
    Chen, Hsiang-Lan
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2014, 22 (05) : 422 - 436
  • [8] R&D Investment Under the Influence of Board Characteristics and Performance Feedback
    Janosova, Lenka
    Jirasek, Michal
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT, LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE (ICMLG 2017), 2017, : 487 - 494
  • [9] STRATEGIC RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT (R&D): WHY BOARD DIVERSITY MATTERS
    Hamid, Masdiah Abdul
    Nawang, Dasilah
    Habidin, Nurul Fadly
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (IEBMC 2019), 2020, 100 : 619 - 626
  • [10] Threshold Effect Analysis of Board Size and Corporate R&D Investment Behavior
    Yu, Lunfang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AND PUBLIC POLICY (ICMIPP 2012), VOLS 1-6, 2012, : 1583 - 1587