Measurement of foliar spray retention on creeping bentgrass

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Pingyuan [1 ]
Branham, Bruce E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Crop Sci, 1201 S Dorner Dr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Scott McElroy; Auburn University; Creeping bentgrass; Agrostis stolonifera L; AGSST 'L93'; Adjuvant; dew; foliar retention efficiency; nozzle type; spray volume; tartrazine; AGRICULTURAL SPRAYS; CARRIER VOLUME; DROPLET SIZE; WEED-CONTROL; EFFICACY; PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTION; ADJUVANTS; DEPOSITS; TRANSLOCATION;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2019.60
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of spray volume, nozzle type, adjuvants, the presence of dew, and their interactions on foliar retention of creeping bentgrass. Tartrazine, a common food dye, was used as a tracer in this study. Increasing spray volume from 95 L ha(-1) to 1,500 L ha(-1) decreased foliar retention efficiency from 98% to approximately 85%. Compared with flat-fan nozzles, air-induction nozzles delivered similar retention efficiency at all spray volumes evaluated. However, flat-fan nozzles provided higher uniformity and more thorough coverage. Adding nonionic surfactants, organosilicone adjuvants, or methylated seed oils at typical concentrations yielded retention efficiency of approximately 90% to 93% regardless of spray volumes. In contrast, with water alone, increasing spray volume reduced retention efficiency from 95.9% to 87.3%. Simulated dew applied at 1,950 L ha(-1) increased retention efficiency by approximately 3% when spray application volume was 190 L ha(-1), while no difference was observed at 750 L ha(-1). The presence of dew reduced the impact of adjuvants on retention efficiency. Large quantities of dew, 3,800 L ha(-1), did reduce retention efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 832
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] REGISTRATION OF CRENSHAW CREEPING BENTGRASS
    ENGELKE, MC
    LEHMAN, VG
    KNEEBONE, WR
    COLBAUGH, PF
    REINERT, JA
    KNOOP, WE
    CROP SCIENCE, 1995, 35 (02) : 590 - 590
  • [22] REGISTRATION OF PUTTER CREEPING BENTGRASS
    BRAUEN, SE
    GOSS, RL
    BREDE, AD
    CROP SCIENCE, 1993, 33 (05) : 1100 - 1100
  • [23] REGISTRATION OF SOUTHSHORE CREEPING BENTGRASS
    HURLEY, RH
    LEHMAN, VG
    MURPHY, JA
    FUNK, CR
    CROP SCIENCE, 1994, 34 (04) : 1124 - 1125
  • [24] Registration of 'Mariner' creeping bentgrass
    Lehman, VG
    Engelke, MC
    Marcum, KB
    Colbaugh, PF
    Reinert, JA
    Ruemmele, BA
    White, RH
    CROP SCIENCE, 1998, 38 (02) : 537 - 537
  • [25] REGISTRATION OF COBRA CREEPING BENTGRASS
    ENGEL, RE
    PEPIN, GW
    EDMINSTER, CW
    CROP SCIENCE, 1994, 34 (01) : 306 - 306
  • [26] Effects of trinexapac-ethyl foliar application on creeping bentgrass responses to combined drought and heat stress
    McCann, Stephen E.
    Huang, Bingru
    CROP SCIENCE, 2007, 47 (05) : 2121 - 2128
  • [27] Effects of Foliar-Applied Ethylene Inhibitor and Synthetic Cytokinin on Creeping Bentgrass to Enhance Heat Tolerance
    Xu, Yan
    Huang, Bingru
    CROP SCIENCE, 2009, 49 (05) : 1876 - 1884
  • [28] Effects of Acute Moisture Stress on Creeping Bentgrass Cuticle Morphology and Associated Effects on Foliar Nitrogen Uptake
    Bethea, Frank G., Jr.
    Park, Dara
    Mount, Andrew
    Menchyk, Nick
    Liu, Haibo
    HORTSCIENCE, 2014, 49 (12) : 1582 - 1587
  • [29] Leaf morphology explains the disparity between annual bluegrass and creeping bentgrass growth under foliar fertilization
    O'Connor, Kelly
    Hebert, Francois
    Powers, Jacqueline E.
    Jordan, Katerina S.
    Lyons, Eric Michael
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2018, 41 (05) : 596 - 608
  • [30] CREEPING BENTGRASS ROOTING AS INFLUENCED BY DITHIOPYR
    DERNOEDEN, PH
    CHRISTIANS, NE
    KROUSE, JM
    ROE, RG
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (03) : 560 - 563