Measurement of foliar spray retention on creeping bentgrass

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Pingyuan [1 ]
Branham, Bruce E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Crop Sci, 1201 S Dorner Dr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Scott McElroy; Auburn University; Creeping bentgrass; Agrostis stolonifera L; AGSST 'L93'; Adjuvant; dew; foliar retention efficiency; nozzle type; spray volume; tartrazine; AGRICULTURAL SPRAYS; CARRIER VOLUME; DROPLET SIZE; WEED-CONTROL; EFFICACY; PERFORMANCE; ABSORPTION; ADJUVANTS; DEPOSITS; TRANSLOCATION;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2019.60
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of spray volume, nozzle type, adjuvants, the presence of dew, and their interactions on foliar retention of creeping bentgrass. Tartrazine, a common food dye, was used as a tracer in this study. Increasing spray volume from 95 L ha(-1) to 1,500 L ha(-1) decreased foliar retention efficiency from 98% to approximately 85%. Compared with flat-fan nozzles, air-induction nozzles delivered similar retention efficiency at all spray volumes evaluated. However, flat-fan nozzles provided higher uniformity and more thorough coverage. Adding nonionic surfactants, organosilicone adjuvants, or methylated seed oils at typical concentrations yielded retention efficiency of approximately 90% to 93% regardless of spray volumes. In contrast, with water alone, increasing spray volume reduced retention efficiency from 95.9% to 87.3%. Simulated dew applied at 1,950 L ha(-1) increased retention efficiency by approximately 3% when spray application volume was 190 L ha(-1), while no difference was observed at 750 L ha(-1). The presence of dew reduced the impact of adjuvants on retention efficiency. Large quantities of dew, 3,800 L ha(-1), did reduce retention efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 832
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors Affecting Foliar Nitrogen Uptake by Creeping Bentgrass
    Henning, S. W.
    Mulvaney, R. L.
    Branham, B. E.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2013, 53 (04) : 1778 - 1783
  • [2] PYTHIUM-SP ASSOCIATED WITH FOLIAR BLIGHTING OF CREEPING BENTGRASS
    MUSE, RR
    SCHMITTHENNER, AF
    PARTYKA, RE
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1974, 64 (02) : 252 - 253
  • [3] Effects of foliar application of nutrients on heat tolerance of creeping bentgrass
    Fu, JM
    Huang, BR
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2003, 26 (01) : 81 - 96
  • [4] Creeping Bentgrass Putting Green Response to Foliar Nitrogen Fertilization
    Zhu, Qing
    Schlossberg, Maxim J.
    Bryant, Ray B.
    Schmidt, John P.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2012, 104 (06) : 1589 - 1594
  • [5] Foliar Fertilization by Tank-mixing with Organic Amendment on Creeping Bentgrass
    Gao, Yang
    Li, Deying
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 22 (02) : 157 - 163
  • [6] Foliar Absorption of Various Inorganic and Organic Nitrogen Sources by Creeping Bentgrass
    Stiegler, J. Chris
    Richardson, Michael D.
    Karcher, Douglas E.
    Roberts, Trenton L.
    Norman, Richard J.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2013, 53 (03) : 1148 - 1152
  • [7] Foliar and Granular Fertilizer Effects on Creeping Bentgrass and Soil Nutrient Levels
    Xiao, Miyuan
    Frank, Kevin W.
    Nikolai, Thomas A.
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 4 (01)
  • [8] Effect of foliar disease on epiphytic yeast populations of creeping bentgrass and tall fescue
    Allen, T. W.
    Burpee, L. L.
    Buck, J. W.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 94 (06) : S3 - S4
  • [9] Efficiency of foliar versus granular fertilization: A field study of creeping bentgrass performance
    Totten, Frederick W.
    Liu, Haibo
    McCarty, Lambert B.
    Baldwin, Christian M.
    Bielenberg, Douglas G.
    Toler, Joe E.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2008, 31 (05) : 972 - 982
  • [10] Dollar Spot Suppression on Creeping Bentgrass in Response to Repeated Foliar Nitrogen Applications
    Townsend, Ronald
    Millican, Michael D.
    Smith, Damon
    Nangle, Ed
    Hockemeyer, Kurt
    Soldat, Doug
    Koch, Paul L.
    PLANT DISEASE, 2021, 105 (02) : 276 - 284