Healthcare professionals' competence in digitalisation: A systematic review

被引:175
|
作者
Konttila, Jenni [1 ]
Siira, Heidi [1 ]
Kyngas, Helvi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lahtinen, Minna [1 ]
Elo, Satu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kaariainen, Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kaakinen, Pirjo [1 ]
Oikarinen, Anne [1 ]
Yamakawa, Miyae [5 ]
Fukui, Sakiko [4 ]
Utsumi, Momoe [6 ]
Higami, Yoko [6 ]
Higuchi, Akari [6 ]
Mikkonen, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Res Unit Nursing Sci & Hlth Management, Oulu, Finland
[2] Oulu Univ Hosp, Med Res Ctr Oulu, Oulu, Finland
[3] Univ Oulu, Oulu, Finland
[4] Ctr Excellence, Finnish Ctr Evidence Based Hlth Care Joanna Brigg, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Evidence Based Clin Nursing, Div Hlth Sci, Osaka, Japan
[6] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Hlth Promot Sci, Div Hlth Sci, Osaka, Japan
关键词
competence; digitalisation; healthcare professional; manager; midwife; nurse; primary healthcare; public healthcare specialist; specialised healthcare; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; NURSES; IMPLEMENTATION; COMMUNICATION; MANAGEMENT; ATTITUDES; EDUCATION; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.14710
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives To identify key areas of competence for digitalisation in healthcare settings, describe healthcare professionals' competencies in these areas and identify factors related to their competence. Background Digitalisation requires changes in healthcare practices, policies and actions to revise job expectations and workflows. The aspects of patient safety and integration of digitalisation into the professional context necessitate an assessment of healthcare professionals' competencies in digitalisation. Design Systematic review. Methods A systematic review was conducted following Center of Reviews and Dissemination guidelines, including application of a PRISMA statement. Four databases-CINAHL (EBSCO), MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science and Academic Search Premiere (EBSCO)-were searched for relevant original peer-reviewed studies published between 2012-2017. Twelve were chosen for final analysis: five quantitative studies and seven qualitative studies, which were, respectively, subjected to narrative and thematic synthesis. Results Key competence areas regarding digitalisation from a healthcare perspective identified encompass knowledge of digital technology and the digital skills required to provide good patient care, including associated social and communication skills, and ethical considerations of digitalisation in patient care. Healthcare professionals need the motivation and willingness to acquire experience of digitalisation in their professional context. Collegial and organisational support appear to be essential factors for building positive experiences of digitalisation for healthcare professionals. Conclusion Healthcare organisations should both pay attention to the social environment of a workplace and create a positive atmosphere if they want to improve the response to digitalisation. The successful implementation of new technology requires organisational and collegial support. Relevance to clinical practice Recommendations for clinical practice include the following: development of competence in digitalisation by healthcare professionals when using technological equipment to minimise errors; provision of sufficient resources, equipment and room for technology usage; and provision of regular education that considers the participants' competencies.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 761
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Educational interventions and their effects on healthcare professionals ' digital competence development: A systematic review
    Kulju, E.
    Jarva, E.
    Oikarinen, A.
    Hammaren, M.
    Kanste, O.
    Mikkonen, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 185
  • [2] Observing cultural competence of healthcare professionals: A systematic review of observational assessment instruments
    Jager, Mirjam
    den Boeft, Andrea
    Versteeg-Pieterse, Annika
    Leij-Halfwerk, Susanne
    Pelgrim, Thomas
    van der Sande, Rob
    van den Muijsenbergh, Maria
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (04) : 750 - 759
  • [3] Healthcare professionals' ethical competence: A scoping review
    Koskenvuori, Janika
    Stolt, Minna
    Suhonen, Riitta
    Leino-Kilpi, Helena
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2019, 6 (01): : 5 - 17
  • [4] Healthcare professionals' competence in stroke care pathways: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Jarva, Erika
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria
    Kaariainen, Maria
    Merilainen, Merja
    Karsikas, Eevi
    Koivunen, Kirsi
    Jounila-Ilola, Paivi
    Oikarinen, Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (9-10) : 1206 - 1235
  • [5] Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
    FitzGerald, Chloe
    Hurst, Samia
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2017, 18
  • [6] Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
    Chloë FitzGerald
    Samia Hurst
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 18
  • [7] Resilience of primary healthcare professionals: a systematic review
    Robertson, Helen D.
    Elliott, Alison M.
    Burton, Christopher
    Iversen, Lisa
    Murchie, Peter
    Porteous, Terry
    Matheson, Catriona
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 66 (647): : E423 - E433
  • [8] Resilience in palliative healthcare professionals: a systematic review
    Zanatta, Francesco
    Maffoni, Marina
    Giardini, Anna
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (03) : 971 - 978
  • [9] Resilience in palliative healthcare professionals: a systematic review
    Francesco Zanatta
    Marina Maffoni
    Anna Giardini
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020, 28 : 971 - 978
  • [10] A systematic review of consumers’ and healthcare professionals’ trust in digital healthcare
    Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane
    QLD, Australia
    不详
    QLD, Australia
    不详
    QLD, Australia
    不详
    QLD, Australia
    不详
    不详
    SA, Australia
    [J]. npj Digit. Med., 2025, 8 (01):