Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid

被引:21
|
作者
Veugen, Lidwien C. E. [1 ]
Hendrikse, Maartje M. E. [1 ]
van Wanrooij, Marc M. [1 ,2 ]
Agterberg, Martijn J. H. [1 ,2 ]
Chalupper, Josef [3 ]
Mens, Lucas H. M. [2 ]
Snik, Ad F. M. [1 ,2 ]
van Opstal, A. John [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Dept Biophys, POB 9101, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] AB ERC, Hannover, Germany
关键词
Sound localization; Cochlear implants; Bimodal stimulation; Binaural cues; Directional hearing; INTERAURAL LEVEL DIFFERENCE; BONE-CONDUCTION DEVICE; BINAURAL HEARING; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; BIMODAL STIMULATION; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; OPPOSITE EARS; COMPLEX SCENE; PINNA CUES; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2016.04.008
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Interaural differences in sound arrival time (ITD) and in level (ILD) enable us to localize sounds in the horizontal plane, and can support source segregation and speech understanding in noisy environments. It is uncertain whether these cues are also available to hearing-impaired listeners who are bimodally fitted, i.e. with a cochlear implant (CI) and a contralateral hearing aid (HA). Here, we assessed sound localization behavior of fourteen bimodal listeners, all using the same Phonak HA and an Advanced Bionics CI processor, matched with respect to loudness growth. We aimed to determine the availability and contribution of binaural (ILDs, temporal fine structure and envelope ITDs) and monaural (loudness, spectral) cues to horizontal sound localization in bimodal listeners, by systematically varying the frequency band, level and envelope of the stimuli. The sound bandwidth had a strong effect on the localization bias of bimodal listeners, although localization performance was typically poor for all conditions. Responses could be systematically changed by adjusting the frequency range of the stimulus, or by simply switching the HA and CI on and off. Localization responses were largely biased to one side, typically the CI side for broadband and highpass filtered sounds, and occasionally to the HA side for low-pass filtered sounds. HA-aided thresholds better than 45 dB HL in the frequency range of the stimulus appeared to be a prerequisite, but not a guarantee, for the ability to indicate sound source direction. We argue that bimodal sound localization is likely based on.ILD cues, even at frequencies below 1500 Hz for which the natural ILDs are small. These cues are typically perturbed in bimodal listeners, leading to a biased localization percept of sounds. The high accuracy of some listeners could result from a combination of sufficient spectral overlap and loudness balance in bimodal hearing. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 82
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth on Speech Recognition Performance of Listeners Using a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid (Bimodal Hearing)
    Neuman, Arlene C.
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (05): : 553 - 561
  • [32] Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: Speech perception and localization
    Tyler, RS
    Parkinson, AJ
    Wilson, BS
    Witt, S
    Preece, JP
    Noble, W
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2002, 23 (02): : 98 - 105
  • [33] Hearing progress and fluctuations in bimodal-binaural hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aid)
    Luntz, Michal
    Yehudai, Noam
    Shpak, Talma
    [J]. ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2007, 127 (10) : 1045 - 1050
  • [34] Auditory, Visual, and Cognitive Abilities in Normal-Hearing Adults, Hearing Aid Users, and Cochlear Implant Users
    Ceuleers, Dorien
    Keppler, Hannah
    Degeest, Sofie
    Baudonck, Nele
    Swinnen, Freya
    Kestens, Katrien
    Dhooge, Ingeborg
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2024, 45 (03): : 679 - 694
  • [35] Multidimensional scaling between acoustic and electric stimuli in cochlear implant users with contralateral hearing
    Vermeire, Katrien
    Landsberger, David M.
    Schleich, Peter
    Van de Heyning, Paul H.
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 2013, 306 : 29 - 36
  • [36] Contralateral masking in cochlear implant users with residual hearing in the non-implanted ear
    James, C
    Blamey, P
    Shallop, JK
    Incerti, PV
    Nicholas, AM
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2001, 6 (02) : 87 - 97
  • [37] Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
    Vroegop, Jantien L.
    Homans, Nienke C.
    van der Schroeff, Marc P.
    Goedegebure, Andre
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2019, 40 (01): : 98 - 106
  • [38] Comparison of speech perception in pediatric CLARION® cochlear implant and hearing aid users
    Svirsky, MA
    Meyer, TA
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04): : 104 - 109
  • [39] The language performance of hearing aid and cochlear implant adult users: A pragmatic approach
    Meilijson, Sara
    Spitzer, Jaclyn B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERACTIONAL RESEARCH IN COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2015, 6 (02) : 237 - 250
  • [40] Hearing aid and cochlear implant in the elderly
    Burdo, S.
    [J]. FRONTIERA ORL, 2013, 4 (01): : 10 - 22