Research on human subjects, exploitation, and global principles of ethics

In 1997, 5.8 million people became infected with HIV, 30.6 million people were living with HIV/AIDS, and infection was running at about sixteen thousand new infections a day, of which more than 90% were in low income countries. Against this background the urgency and importance of the fight against HIV/AIDS can scarcely be exaggerated. While a cure for AIDS remains elusive research to discover more effective treatment and possible vaccines is vital. It is at this crucial moment that moral criticism has emerged of some of the most promising research towards treatments and vaccines for HIV/AIDS. This criticism has focused on, and purports to be justified by, the major current international principles and protocols on the ethics of research on human subjects, If this criticism is valid and no better ways of prosecuting successful research on AIDS can be found, the consequences, as the figures above indicate, are truly bleak. This paper will attempt to provide an appropriate framework for assessing the ethics of research on human subjects generally and in doing so will assess the relevance and force of the major ethical criticisms that have been levelled at current research on human subjects in the context of HIV/AIDS therapy and vaccines.