Assessment of the convergent validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function scale with analogue functional analysis and the Motivation Assessment Scale

被引:90
|
作者
Paclawskyj, TR
Matson, JL
Rush, KS
Smalls, Y
Vollmer, TR
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Psychol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Kennedy Krieger Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Psychol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[5] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
analogue functional analysis; convergent validity; Motivation Assessment Scale; Questions About Behavioral Function Scale;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00364.x
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The present study examined the convergent validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF) scale, a behavioural checklist for assessing variables maintaining aberrant behaviour, with analogue functional analyses and the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS). The two checklists were more highly correlated with each other than either checklist with results from the analogue sessions, and the QABF was more highly correlated with analogue sessions than the MAS. Using analogue sessions, the experimenters failed to ascertain behavioural function for a number of subjects because the behaviour problems in question were low frequency/high intensity and failed to appear during the course of the analysis, pointing out a limitation of this technology. These findings, taken together with recent research outlining the psychometric properties of the QABF, seem to support the use of the QABF in a hierarchical model of functional analysis. The implications of the findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 494
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Function Assessment Scale for Spinal Deformity Validity and Reliability of a New Clinical Scale
    Severijns, Pieter
    Overbergh, Thomas
    Ackermans, Thijs
    Beaucage-Gauvreau, Erica
    Brumagne, Simon
    Desloovere, Kaat
    Scheys, Lennart
    Moke, Lieven
    [J]. SPINE, 2022, 47 (02) : E64 - E72
  • [22] Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Two Studies of Convergent Validity
    Alexandra L. Trout
    Joseph B. Ryan
    Steven P. La Vigne
    Michael H. Epstein
    [J]. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2003, 12 (4) : 399 - 410
  • [24] THE BEHAVIORAL SUMMARIZED EVALUATION - VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A SCALE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF AUTISTIC BEHAVIORS
    BARTHELEMY, C
    ADRIEN, JL
    TANGUAY, P
    GARREAU, B
    FERMANIAN, J
    ROUX, S
    SAUVAGE, D
    LELORD, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 1990, 20 (02) : 189 - 204
  • [25] The assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and amotivation: Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Academic Motivation Scale
    Barkoukis, Vassilis
    Tsorbatzoudis, Haralambos
    Grouios, George
    Sideridis, Georgios
    [J]. ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2008, 15 (01) : 39 - 55
  • [26] The Error-Oriented Motivation Scale: An examination of structural and convergent validity
    Schell, Kraig L.
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 52 (03) : 352 - 356
  • [27] The motivation assessment scale: Reliability and construct validity across three topographies of behavior
    Duker, PC
    Sigafoos, J
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 1998, 19 (02) : 131 - 141
  • [28] FACTOR STRUCTURE OF THE MOTIVATION ASSESSMENT SCALE
    SINGH, NN
    DONATELLI, LS
    BEST, A
    WILLIAMS, DE
    BARRERA, FJ
    LENZ, MW
    LANDRUM, TJ
    ELLIS, CR
    MOE, TL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 1993, 37 : 65 - 74
  • [29] The Learning Loss Scale as an Assessment Tool: An Empirical Examination of Convergent Validity with Performative Measures
    Hooker, John
    Denker, Katherine
    [J]. COMMUNICATION TEACHER, 2014, 28 (02) : 130 - 143
  • [30] Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the Motivation Assessment Scale and Resident Choice Assessment Scale
    Christopher A. Kearney
    L. Caitlin Cook
    Gillian Chapman
    Arva Bensaheb
    [J]. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 2006, 18 : 1 - 11