Preventability review of severe maternal morbidity

被引:26
|
作者
Lawton, Beverley A. [1 ]
MacDonald, E. Jane [1 ]
Stanley, James [2 ]
Daniells, Karen [3 ]
Geller, Stacie E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ Wellington, Te Tatai Hauora O Hine Fac Hlth, Ctr Womens Hlth Res, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Univ Otago, Deans Dept, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Hutt Valley Dist Heath Board, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
preventability; quality audit; severe maternal morbidity; MORTALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.13526
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) is rising globally. Assessing SMM is an important quality measure. This study aimed to examine SMM in a national cohort in New Zealand. Material and methods This is a national retrospective review of pregnant or postpartum women admitted to an Intensive Care Unit or High Dependency Unit during pregnancy or recent postpartum. Outcomes were rates of SMM and assessment of potential preventability. Preventability was defined as any action on the part of the provider, system or patient that may have contributed to progression to more severe morbidity, and was assessed by a multidisciplinary review team. Results Severe maternal morbidity was 6.2 per 1000 deliveries (95% confidence interval 5.7-6.8) with higher rates for Pacific, Indian and other Asian racial groups. Major blood loss (39.4%), preeclampsia-associated conditions (23.3%) and severe sepsis (14.1%) were the most common causes of SMM. Potential preventability was highest with sepsis cases (56%) followed by preeclampsia and major blood loss (34.3% and 30.9%). Of these cases, only 36.4% were managed appropriately as determined by multidisciplinary review. Provider factors such as inappropriate diagnosis, delay or failure to recognize high risk were the most common factors associated with potential preventability of SMM. Pacific Island women had over twice the rate of preventable morbidity (relative risk 2.48, 95% confidence interval 1.28-4.79). Conclusions Multidisciplinary external anonymized review of SMM showed that over a third of cases were potentially preventable, being due to substandard provider care with increased preventability rates for racial/ethnic minority women. Monitoring country rates of SMM and implementing case reviews to assess potential preventability are appropriate quality improvement measures and external review of anonymized cases may reduce racial profiling to inform unbiased appropriate interventions and resource allocation to help prevent these severe events.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 522
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Statewide Severe Maternal Morbidity Review in Illinois
    Geller, Stacie E.
    Garland, Caitlin E.
    Horne, Ashley A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (01): : 41 - 48
  • [22] Standardized Severe Maternal Morbidity Review: Rationale and Process
    Kilpatrick, Sarah J.
    Berg, Cynthia
    Bernstein, Peter
    Bingham, Debra
    Delgado, Ana
    Callaghan, William M.
    Harris, Karen
    Lanni, Susan
    Mahoney, Jeanne
    Main, Elliot
    Nacht, Amy
    Schellpfeffer, Michael
    Westover, Thomas
    Harper, Margaret
    [J]. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2014, 43 (04): : 403 - 408
  • [23] Standardized Severe Maternal Morbidity Review Rationale and Process
    Kilpatrick, Sarah J.
    Berg, Cynthia
    Bernstein, Peter
    Bingham, Debra
    Delgado, Ana
    Callaghan, William M.
    Harris, Karen
    Lanni, Susan
    Mahoney, Jeanne
    Main, Elliot
    Nacht, Amy
    Schellpfeffer, Michael
    Westover, Thomas
    Harper, Margaret
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 124 (02): : 361 - 366
  • [24] Severe and acute maternal morbidity: Lithuanian experience and review
    Minkauskiene, M
    Nadisauskiene, RJ
    Padaiga, Z
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY AND WOMENS MEDICINE, 2006, 51 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [25] WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality: The prevalence of severe acute maternal morbidity (near miss)
    Say L.
    Pattinson R.C.
    Gülmezoglu A.M.
    [J]. Reproductive Health, 1 (1)
  • [26] Reliability of a preventability model in maternal death and morbidity needs further assessment
    Marasinghe, Jeevan P.
    Amarasinghe, W. I.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (04) : 440 - 440
  • [27] Understanding Severe Maternal Morbidity: Hospital-based Review
    Kilpatrick, Sarah J.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 61 (02): : 340 - 346
  • [28] Implementing Statewide Severe Maternal Morbidity Review: The Illinois Experience
    Koch, Abigail R.
    Roesch, Pamela T.
    Garland, Caitlin E.
    Geller, Stacie E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (05): : 458 - 464
  • [29] Findings From Severe Maternal Morbidity Surveillance and Review in Maryland
    Wolfson, Carrie
    Qian, Jiage
    Chin, Pamela
    Downey, Cathy
    Mattingly, Katie Jo
    Jones-Beatty, Kimberly
    Olaku, Joanne
    Qureshi, Sadaf
    Rhule, Jane
    Silldorff, Danielle
    Atlas, Robert
    Banfield, Anne
    Johnson, Clark T.
    Neale, Donna
    Sheffield, Jeanne S.
    Silverman, David
    McLaughlin, Kacie
    Koru, Gunes
    Creanga, Andreea A.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (11) : e2244077
  • [30] Severe Maternal Morbidity in Twins
    Binstock, Anna
    Bodnar, Lisa M.
    Himes, Katherine P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2023, 40 (07) : 704 - 710