Resident Perception and Willingness to Pay for the Restoration and Revitalization of Urban Rivers

被引:6
|
作者
Lee, Frederick Y. S. [1 ]
Ma, Anson T. H. [2 ]
Cheung, Lewis T. O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Ctr Water Technol & Policy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Educ Univ Hong Kong, Dept Social Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
river restoration; river revitalization; willingness to pay; attitude; place attachment; PLACE ATTACHMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ATTITUDE; DETERMINANTS; BIODIVERSITY; EXPECTATIONS; RESOURCES; BENEFITS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3390/w13192649
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
River revitalization, also called river restoration, has been implemented globally to restore urban river ecosystems that would benefit both the environment and local residents in various ways. The Hong Kong government has been attempting to revitalize local urban rivers; however, the perception and value of river restoration have not been assessed. With the application of a contingent valuation method, a questionnaire survey was designed to capture the attitude, place attachment, and willingness to pay (WTP) of Hong Kong residents in the context of urban rivers and river revitalization, and a proposed scenario for revitalization is given. The relationships among WTP, attitude and place attachment were explored through regression analysis. A total of 400 questionnaire samples were collected from Hong Kong residents, and over 75% of respondents were willing to pay for the proposed scenario. The results from regression analysis indicated that attitude, place dependence, place identity, and place social bonding positively influenced WTP and WTP bid amounts. In contrast, the place effect was unexpectedly found to be negatively correlated with WTP. Implications were drawn from these results, and recommendations were made concerning the features to be restored and conserved in future river revitalization work and the need to provide quality urban nature-based spaces for citizens.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chinese urban resident willingness to pay for green housing based on double-entry mental accounting theory
    Qianwen Li
    Ruyin Long
    Hong Chen
    Feiyu Chen
    Xiu Cheng
    Natural Hazards, 2019, 95 : 129 - 153
  • [22] Is There a Willingness to Pay for Corporate Social Responsibility? Consumers' Perception
    Fernandez Kranz, Daniel
    Merino Castello, Anna
    UNIVERSIA BUSINESS REVIEW, 2005, (07): : 38 - 53
  • [23] Consumer perception and willingness to pay for milk in Tennessee.
    Eckelkamp, E. A.
    Paskewitz, E. A.
    Wallace, H. S.
    Johnson, K. B.
    Upendram, S.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 : 102 - 102
  • [24] Milk packaging innovation: Consumer perception and willingness to pay
    Merlino, Valentina Maria
    Brun, Filippo
    Versino, Alice
    Blanc, Simone
    AIMS AGRICULTURE AND FOOD, 2020, 5 (02): : 307 - 326
  • [25] Evaluating consumer perception and willingness to pay for broadband in Nigeria
    Urama, Nathaniel E.
    Ogbu, Osita
    TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2018, 42 (06) : 421 - 432
  • [26] Willingness to Pay For Achieving Good Status Across Rivers in the Republic of Ireland
    Buckley, Cathal
    Howley, Peter
    O'Donoghue, Cathal
    Kilgarriff, Paul
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL REVIEW, 2016, 47 (03) : 425 - 445
  • [27] Willingness to Pay as an Index of Direct Taxation for Restoration of Seaside Environment
    Kopsidas, Odysseas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING 2019 (ICCMSE-2019), 2019, 2186
  • [28] Assessment Riparian's Willingness to Pay for Restoration of Lake Chad
    Kitoto, Patrick Arnold Ombiono
    REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE, 2018, 128 (06): : 1175 - 1198
  • [29] South Koreans' willingness to pay for restoration of Gomsoman Tidal Flat
    Kim, Ju-Hee
    Kim, Sin-Young
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 199
  • [30] What are Barrier Islands Worth? Estimates of Willingness to Pay for Restoration
    Petrolia, Daniel R.
    Kim, Tae-Goun
    MARINE RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 24 (02) : 131 - 146