Capturing flood-risk dynamics with a coupled agent-based and hydraulic modelling framework

被引:29
|
作者
Michaelis, Tamara [1 ,2 ]
Brandimarte, Luigia [1 ]
Mazzoleni, Maurizio [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Ctr Nat Hazards & Disaster Sci CNDS, Uppsala, Sweden
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
agent-based model (ABM); LISFLOOD; levee effect; adaptation effect; decision making; SOCIO-HYDROLOGY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RIVER; STRATEGIES; INSIGHTS; BEHAVIOR; RESOLUTION; RESIDENTS; PROTOCOL; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1080/02626667.2020.1750617
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Two-way interactions and feedback between hydrological and social processes in settled floodplains determine the complex human-flood system and change vulnerability over time. To focus on the dynamic role of individual and governmental decision making on flood-risk management, we developed and implemented a coupled agent-based and hydraulic modelling framework. Within this framework, household agents are located in a floodplain protected by a levee system. Individual behaviour is based on Protection Motivation Theory and includes the options to (1) not react to flood risk; (2) implement individual flood protection measures; or (3) file a complaint to the government. The government decides about reinforcing the levee system, compromising between a cost-benefit analysis and filed complaints from households. We found that individual decision making can significantly influence flood risk. In addition, the coupled agent-based and hydraulic modelling framework approach captures commonly observed socio-hydrological dynamics, namely levee and adaptation effects. It provides an explanatory tool for assessing spatial and temporal dynamics of flood risk in a socio-hydrological system.
引用
收藏
页码:1458 / 1473
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flood risk management in Sint Maarten - A coupled agent-based and flood modelling method
    Abebe, Yared Abayneh
    Ghorbani, Amineh
    Nikolic, Igor
    Vojinovic, Zoran
    Sanchez, Arlex
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 248
  • [2] Agent-based modelling and flood risk management: A compendious literature review
    Zhuo, Lu
    Han, Dawei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 591
  • [3] A coupled flood-agent-institution modelling (CLAIM) framework for urban flood risk management
    Abebe, Yared Abayneh
    Ghorbani, Amineh
    Nikolic, Igor
    Vojinovic, Zoran
    Sanchez, Arlex
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2019, 111 : 483 - 492
  • [4] A GENERAL FRAMEWORK FOR AGENT-BASED MODELLING WITH APPLICATIONS TO INFECTIOUS DISEASE DYNAMICS
    Laskowski, Marek
    Moghadas, Seyed M.
    [J]. BIOMAT 2013: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2014, : 318 - 339
  • [5] An Agent-Based Model of Flood Risk and Insurance
    Dubbelboer, Jan
    Nikolic, Igor
    Jenkins, Katie
    Hall, Jim
    [J]. JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2017, 20 (01):
  • [6] Towards a Community Framework for Agent-Based Modelling
    Janssen, Marco A.
    Alessa, Lilian Na'ia
    Barton, Michael
    Bergin, Sean
    Lee, Allen
    [J]. JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2008, 11 (02):
  • [7] MODAM: A MODular Agent-Based Modelling Framework
    Boulaire, Fanny
    Utting, Mark
    Drogemuller, Robin
    [J]. 2013 2ND INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CHALLENGES FOR THE SMART GRID (SE4SG), 2013, : 33 - 40
  • [8] AN AGENT-BASED MODELLING FRAMEWORK FOR URBAN AGRICULTURE
    Ghandar, Adam
    Theodoropoulos, Georgios
    Zhong, Miner
    Zhen, Bowen
    Chen, Shijie
    Gong, Yue
    Ahmed, Ayyaz
    [J]. 2019 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2019, : 1767 - 1778
  • [9] Agent-Based Modelling of a Commodity Market Dynamics
    Gebarowski, R.
    Drozdz, S.
    Gorski, A. Z.
    Oswiecimka, P.
    [J]. ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A, 2016, 129 (05) : 1032 - 1037
  • [10] An Agent-Based Model of Evolving Community Flood Risk
    Tonn, Gina L.
    Guikema, Seth D.
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 38 (06) : 1258 - 1278