GPR pattern recognition of shallow subsurface air voids

被引:39
|
作者
Luo, Tess X. H. [1 ]
Lai, Wallace W. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Land Surveying & Geoinformat, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Ground penetrating radar; Subsurface air void; Pyramid method; Pattern recognition; GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR; THRESHOLDING TECHNIQUES; PERFORMANCE; FEATURES; PIPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.tust.2020.103355
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Countless subsurface voids in urban areas of cities threaten people's lives and property. A workflow for automatically identifying subsurface voids from ground penetrating radar (GPR) data was developed in this study. The workflow consists of 3 stages: locating voids automatically from C-scans, then verifying voids from corresponding B-scans, and finally making judgements based upon the previous 2 sets of results. This study adopted 2 (Lai a al., 2016) approaches: approach 1 quantified the GPR response of air voids using forward modelling, while approach 2 used workflow prototyping and validation with inverse modelling. Forward simulations indicated that different ratios of void size to GPR signal footprint could result in a variety of patterns in B-scans: they can be hyperbolas, cross patterns, bowl shaped patterns and reverberations. With a database of void patterns of both C-scans and B-scans established, in approach 2 the workflow uses a pyramid pattern recognition method - with pixel value or gradient being used for feature identification - to search automatically for air-filled void responses in GPR data. The workflow was tested using 2 laboratory and field experiments and the results were promising. The constraint values proposed by the 2 experiments were validated with another site experiment. Given the huge workload involved in city-scale subsurface health inspections, a standardized workflow can help improve efficiency and effectiveness of subsurface void identification.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shallow Subsurface Soil Moisture Estimation in Coal Mining Area Using GPR Signal Features and BP Neural Network
    Qiu, Chaoqi
    Du, Wenfeng
    Zhang, Shuaiji
    Ru, Xuewen
    Liu, Wei
    Zhong, Chuanxing
    WATER, 2025, 17 (06)
  • [32] Application of GPR for delineating the neotectonic setting and shallow subsurface nature of the seismically active Gedi fault, Kachchh, western India
    Maurya, D. M.
    Chouksey, V.
    Joshi, Parul N.
    Chamyal, L. S.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2013, 10 (03)
  • [33] Frequency band adjustment match filtering based on variable frequency GPR antennas pairing scheme for shallow subsurface investigations
    Shaikh, Shahid Ali
    Tian, Gang
    Shi, Zhanjie
    Zhao, Wenke
    Junejo, S. A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 149 : 42 - 51
  • [34] SHALLOW SUBSURFACE FLOW MODEL
    RAWLS, WJ
    ASMUSSEN, LE
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1978, 59 (04): : 282 - 282
  • [35] GPR for UXO recognition
    Grimberg, Raimond
    Savin, Adriana
    Iftimie, Nicoleta
    Leitoiu, Sorin
    Andreescu, Aurel
    ELECTROMAGNETIC NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION (XIV), 2011, 35 : 381 - 388
  • [36] An overview of GPR subsurface exploration of planets and moons
    Pettinelli E.
    Cosciotti B.
    Lauro S.E.
    Mattei E.
    Leading Edge, 2022, 41 (10): : 672 - 680
  • [37] Detection of subsurface voids using scanning thermal microscopy
    Mills, G
    Weaver, JMR
    Harris, G
    Chen, W
    Carrejo, J
    Johnson, L
    Rogers, B
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 1999, 80 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [38] Modelling GPR for Characterization of Subsurface EM Properties
    Maiti, Subrata
    Patra, Sarat K.
    Bhattacharya, Amitabha
    2013 IEEE MTT-S INTERNATIONAL MICROWAVE AND RF CONFERENCE, 2013,
  • [39] Nanoindentation response of cortical bone: dependency of subsurface voids
    Ramezanzadehkoldeh, Masoud
    Skallerud, Bjorn
    BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2017, 16 (05) : 1599 - 1612
  • [40] Nanoindentation response of cortical bone: dependency of subsurface voids
    Masoud Ramezanzadehkoldeh
    Bjørn Skallerud
    Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2017, 16 : 1599 - 1612