Machine Learning Methods for Sweet Spot Detection: A Case Study

被引:6
|
作者
Hauge, Vera Louise [1 ]
Hermansen, Gudmund Horn [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Comp Ctr, 114 Blindern, N-0314 Oslo, Norway
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-46819-8_38
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In the geosciences, sweet spots are defined as areas of a reservoir that represent best production potential. From the outset, it is not always obvious which reservoir characteristics that best determine the location, and influence the likelihood, of a sweet spot. Here, we will view detection of sweet spots as a supervised learning problem and use tools and methodology from machine learning to build data-driven sweet spot classifiers. We will discuss some popular machine learning methods for classification including logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, and random forest. We will highlight strengths and shortcomings of each method. In particular, we will draw attention to a complex setting and focus on a smaller real data study with limited evidence for sweet spots, where most of these methods struggle. We will illustrate a simple solution where we aim at increasing the performance of these by optimizing for precision. In conclusion, we observe that all methods considered need some sort of preprocessing or additional tuning to attain practical utility. While the application of support vector machine and random forest shows a fair degree of promise, we still stress the need for caution in naive use of machine learning methodology in the geosciences.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 588
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detection of child depression using machine learning methods
    Haque, Umme Marzia
    Kabir, Enamul
    Khanam, Rasheda
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12):
  • [32] Solution of the Fracture Detection Problem by Machine Learning Methods
    Muratov, M., V
    Biryukov, V. A.
    Petrov, I. B.
    DOKLADY MATHEMATICS, 2020, 101 (02) : 169 - 171
  • [33] Review of Machine Learning Methods for Windows Malware Detection
    Naz, Saima
    Singh, Dushyant Kumar
    2019 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES (ICCCNT), 2019,
  • [34] Machine Learning Methods for Microwave Imaging in Cancer Detection
    Costanzo, Sandra
    Flores, Alexandra
    Buonanno, Giovanni
    2022 IEEE INTL CONF ON DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING, INTL CONF ON PERVASIVE INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING, INTL CONF ON CLOUD AND BIG DATA COMPUTING, INTL CONF ON CYBER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CONGRESS (DASC/PICOM/CBDCOM/CYBERSCITECH), 2022, : 98 - 102
  • [35] An Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Prominence Detection in French
    Christodoulides, George
    Avanzi, Mathieu
    15TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION (INTERSPEECH 2014), VOLS 1-4, 2014, : 116 - 119
  • [36] Autism Spectrum Disorder Detection with Machine Learning Methods
    Erkan, Ugur
    Thanh, Dang N. H.
    CURRENT PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2019, 15 (04) : 297 - 308
  • [37] An Analysis of Machine Learning Methods for Spam Host Detection
    Silva, Renato M.
    Yamakami, Akebo
    Almeida, Tiago A.
    2012 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS (ICMLA 2012), VOL 2, 2012, : 227 - 232
  • [38] Machine Learning Methods for Anomaly Detection in BACnet Networks
    Tonejc, Jernej
    Guettes, Sabrina
    Kobekova, Alexandra
    Kaur, Jaspreet
    JOURNAL OF UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2016, 22 (09) : 1203 - 1224
  • [39] Credit Card Fraud Detection - Machine Learning methods
    Varmedja, Dejan
    Karanovic, Mirjana
    Sladojevic, Srdjan
    Arsenovic, Marko
    Anderla, Andras
    2019 18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH), 2019,
  • [40] Phishing URL detection using machine learning methods
    Ahammad, S. K. Hasane
    Kale, Sunil D.
    Upadhye, Gopal D.
    Pande, Sandeep Dwarkanath
    Babu, E. Venkatesh
    Dhumane, Amol, V
    Bahadur, Dilip Kumar Jang
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2022, 173