Who Benefits from Government Healthcare Subsidies? An Assessment of the Equity of Healthcare Benefits Distribution in China

被引:26
|
作者
Chen, Mingsheng [1 ]
Fang, Guixia [2 ]
Wang, Lidan [2 ]
Wang, Zhonghua [1 ]
Zhao, Yuxin [3 ]
Si, Lei [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Sch Hlth Adm, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Hlth Peoples Republ China, Natl Hlth Dev Res Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS; UNIVERSAL COVERAGE; SOUTH-AFRICA; POOR; SYSTEM; REFORM; CHALLENGES; LORENZ; GHANA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0119840
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Improving the equitable distribution of government healthcare subsidies (GHS), particularly among low-income citizens, is a major goal of China's healthcare sector reform in China. Objectives This study investigates the distribution of GHS in China between socioeconomic populations at two different points in time, examines the comparative distribution of healthcare benefits before and after healthcare reforms in Northwest China, compares the parity of distribution between urban and rural areas, and explores factors that influence equitable GHS distribution. Methods Benefit incidence analysis of GHS progressivity was performed, and concentration and Kakwani indices for outpatient, inpatient, and total healthcare were calculated. Two rounds of household surveys that used multistage stratified samples were conducted in 2003 (13,564 respondents) and 2008 (12,973 respondents). Data on socioeconomics, healthcare payments, and healthcare utilization were collected using household interviews. Results High-income individuals generally reap larger benefits from GHS, as reflected by positive concentration indices, which indicates a regressive system. Concentration indices for inpatient care were 0.2199 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0829 to 0.3568) and 0.4445 (95% CI, 0.3000 to 0.5890) in 2002 (urban vs. rural, respectively), and 0.3925 (95% CI, 0.2528 to 0.5322) and 0.4084 (95% CI, 0.2977 to 0.5190) in 2007. Outpatient healthcare subsidies showed different distribution patterns in urban and rural areas following the redesign of rural healthcare insurance programs (urban vs. rural: 0.1433 [95% CI, 0.0263 to 0.2603] and 0.3662 [95% CI, 0.2703 to 0.4622] in 2002, respectively; 0.3063 [95% CI, 0.1657 to 0.4469] and -0.0273 [95% CI, -0.1702 to 0.1156] in 2007). Conclusions Our study demonstrates an inequitable distribution of GHS in China from 2002 to 2007; however, the inequity was reduced, especially in rural outpatient services. Future healthcare reforms in China should not only focus on expanding the coverage, but also on improving the equity of distribution of healthcare benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Review of focus groups and their benefits for healthcare
    Trace, Anna
    Curtin, Sharon
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2013, 28 : 322 - 323
  • [32] THE BENEFITS OF MINDFULNESS IN MENTAL HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS
    Watson, T.
    Walker, O.
    Varghese, A.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 56 (1_SUPPL): : 250 - 250
  • [33] The Benefits Of Sustainable Banking And Private Healthcare
    不详
    [J]. FORBES, 2017, 200 (03): : 112 - 112
  • [34] THE DISTRIBUTION OF GOVERNMENT BURDENS AND BENEFITS
    TUCKER, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1953, 48 (263) : 636 - 636
  • [35] THE DISTRIBUTION OF GOVERNMENT BURDENS AND BENEFITS
    Tucker, Rufus S.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1953, 43 (02): : 518 - 543
  • [36] Who Benefits From IFRS Convergence in China?
    Chen, Chao
    Lee, Edward
    Lobo, Gerald J.
    Zhu, Jessie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2019, 34 (01): : 99 - 124
  • [37] Assessment Of Benefits Of Scig Valued By Healthcare Providers and Patients: Survey Results
    Zampelli, Annette R.
    Duff, Carla M.
    Bullinger, Ann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 133 (02) : AB10 - AB10
  • [38] Healthcare benefits for disabled adults: pathologies and healthcare treatments for beneficiairies in 2017
    Verboux, Dorian
    Thomas, Martine
    Colinot, Nadine
    Espagnacq, Maude
    Pichetti, Sylvain
    Chevalier, Sophie
    Landais, Cecile
    Fouard, Annie
    Gastaldi-Menager, Christelle
    Rachas, Antoine
    [J]. SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2022, 34 (03): : 345 - 358
  • [39] Benefits, harms and evidence - reflections from UK primary healthcare
    McCartney, Margaret
    [J]. LONDON JOURNAL OF PRIMARY CARE, 2018, 10 (01) : 8 - 12
  • [40] IMPACT OF FINANCIAL SUBSIDIES ON ECOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE BENEFITS: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Liu, Yingyuan
    Zhou, Yudong
    Zha, Haifeng
    Mathieu, Soro Sonfoungowari
    [J]. TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2021, 20 (2A): : 704 - 722