Who Benefits from Government Healthcare Subsidies? An Assessment of the Equity of Healthcare Benefits Distribution in China

被引:26
|
作者
Chen, Mingsheng [1 ]
Fang, Guixia [2 ]
Wang, Lidan [2 ]
Wang, Zhonghua [1 ]
Zhao, Yuxin [3 ]
Si, Lei [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Sch Hlth Adm, Hefei, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Hlth Peoples Republ China, Natl Hlth Dev Res Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
INCOME DISTRIBUTIONS; UNIVERSAL COVERAGE; SOUTH-AFRICA; POOR; SYSTEM; REFORM; CHALLENGES; LORENZ; GHANA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0119840
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Improving the equitable distribution of government healthcare subsidies (GHS), particularly among low-income citizens, is a major goal of China's healthcare sector reform in China. Objectives This study investigates the distribution of GHS in China between socioeconomic populations at two different points in time, examines the comparative distribution of healthcare benefits before and after healthcare reforms in Northwest China, compares the parity of distribution between urban and rural areas, and explores factors that influence equitable GHS distribution. Methods Benefit incidence analysis of GHS progressivity was performed, and concentration and Kakwani indices for outpatient, inpatient, and total healthcare were calculated. Two rounds of household surveys that used multistage stratified samples were conducted in 2003 (13,564 respondents) and 2008 (12,973 respondents). Data on socioeconomics, healthcare payments, and healthcare utilization were collected using household interviews. Results High-income individuals generally reap larger benefits from GHS, as reflected by positive concentration indices, which indicates a regressive system. Concentration indices for inpatient care were 0.2199 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0829 to 0.3568) and 0.4445 (95% CI, 0.3000 to 0.5890) in 2002 (urban vs. rural, respectively), and 0.3925 (95% CI, 0.2528 to 0.5322) and 0.4084 (95% CI, 0.2977 to 0.5190) in 2007. Outpatient healthcare subsidies showed different distribution patterns in urban and rural areas following the redesign of rural healthcare insurance programs (urban vs. rural: 0.1433 [95% CI, 0.0263 to 0.2603] and 0.3662 [95% CI, 0.2703 to 0.4622] in 2002, respectively; 0.3063 [95% CI, 0.1657 to 0.4469] and -0.0273 [95% CI, -0.1702 to 0.1156] in 2007). Conclusions Our study demonstrates an inequitable distribution of GHS in China from 2002 to 2007; however, the inequity was reduced, especially in rural outpatient services. Future healthcare reforms in China should not only focus on expanding the coverage, but also on improving the equity of distribution of healthcare benefits.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benefits for Older People from Government Subsidies for Healthcare in China: Is the Distribution Equitable?
    Mingsheng Chen
    Zhonghua Wang
    [J]. Social Indicators Research, 2022, 160 : 505 - 521
  • [2] Benefits for Older People from Government Subsidies for Healthcare in China: Is the Distribution Equitable?
    Chen, Mingsheng
    Wang, Zhonghua
    [J]. SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2022, 160 (2-3) : 505 - 521
  • [3] Equity assessment of maternal and child healthcare benefits utilization and distribution in public healthcare facilities in Bangladesh: a benefit incidence analysis
    Sheikh, Nurnabi
    Sultana, Marufa
    Sarker, Abdur Razzaque
    Morton, Alec
    [J]. POPULATION HEALTH METRICS, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [4] Equity assessment of maternal and child healthcare benefits utilization and distribution in public healthcare facilities in Bangladesh: a benefit incidence analysis
    Nurnabi Sheikh
    Marufa Sultana
    Abdur Razzaque Sarker
    Alec Morton
    [J]. Population Health Metrics, 21
  • [5] Assessment of equity in healthcare financing and benefits distribution in Tanzania: a cross-sectional study protocol
    Binyaruka, Peter
    Kuwawenaruwa, August
    Ally, Mariam
    Piatti, Moritz
    Mtei, Gemini
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [6] DISTRIBUTION OF BENEFITS FROM GOVERNMENT SERVICES - HORIZONTAL EQUITY
    SHOUP, CS
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE-FINANCES PUBLIQUES, 1988, 43 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [7] Healthcare message standards - Who benefits?
    Benson, T
    [J]. MEDICAL INFORMATICS EUROPE '96: HUMAN FACETS IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 1996, 34 : 253 - 258
  • [8] WHO BENEFITS FROM SUBSIDIES - DOES ANYONE
    ROBINSON, WC
    [J]. POLICY REVIEW, 1983, 26 (FAL) : 59 - 64
  • [9] WHO BENEFITS FROM HIGHER EDUCATION SUBSIDIES
    HANSEN, WL
    [J]. MONTHLY LABOR REVIEW, 1970, 93 (03) : 43 - 46
  • [10] Assessment of Ubiquitous Healthcare Information Systems Benefits
    Montazemi, Ali Reza
    Pittaway, Jeff J.
    Qahri-Saremi, Hamed
    [J]. AMCIS 2010 PROCEEDINGS, 2010,