Deliberate reasoning is not affected by language

被引:22
|
作者
Maekelae, Martin Jensen [1 ]
Pfuhl, Gerit [1 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Psychol, Fac Hlth Sci, Tromso, Norway
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
FOREIGN-LANGUAGE; COGNITIVE REFLECTION; DECISION-MAKING; BILINGUAL ADVANTAGES; ANALYTIC PROCESSES; AGE-DIFFERENCES; HEURISTICS; THINKING; INTELLIGENCE; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0211428
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Millions of people use a second language every day. Does this have an effect on their decision-making? Are decisions in a second language more deliberate? Two mechanisms have been proposed: reduced emotionality or increased deliberation. Most studies so far used problems where both mechanisms could contribute to a foreign language effect. Here, we aimed to identify whether deliberate reasoning increases for problems that are devoid of any emotional connotation when using a second language or having to switch between native and second language. Method We measured deliberate reasoning with items from the cognitive reflection test, ratio bias, a probability matching task, and base rate neglect items. We recruited over 500 participants from Norway and the Netherlands that had English as their second language. Participants were randomly assigned to either the native, switching or second language condition. We measured: number of correctly answered items-deliberate reasoning score, perceived effort, perceived accuracy or confidence, and language proficiency. Results Deliberate reasoning was not increased when using a second language or when having to switch between native and second language. All three groups performed equally well. Significant predictors of deliberate reasoning were age, gender, education, perceived effort, and confidence but not the language context. Participants with low English proficiency spent more time reading compared to more fluent speakers. Conclusion There is no advantage of second language on deliberate reasoning in the absence of time pressure. Deliberation was not increased by providing items in a second language, but through the willingness to spend cognitive effort and time to read carefully.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reevaluating pragmatic reasoning in language games
    Sikos, Les
    Venhuizen, Noortje J.
    Drenhaus, Heiner
    Crocker, Matthew W.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [42] Language as a mechanism for reasoning about possibilities
    Grigoroglou, Myrto
    Ganea, Patricia A. A.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 377 (1866)
  • [43] Is there neural dissociation between language and reasoning?
    Tzourio-Mazoyer, Nathalie
    Zago, Laure
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (10) : 494 - 495
  • [44] A Corpus of Natural Language for Visual Reasoning
    Suhr, Alane
    Lewis, Mike
    Yeh, James
    Artzi, Yoav
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 55TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (ACL 2017), VOL 2, 2017, : 217 - 223
  • [45] Didactic Reasoning in Speech and Language Therapy
    Wolfs, Andreas
    SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2018, 42 (03): : 123 - 126
  • [46] Commonsense reasoning in and over natural language
    Liu, H
    Singh, P
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED INTELLIGENT INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, PT 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3215 : 293 - 306
  • [47] Predicting Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Games
    Frank, Michael C.
    Goodman, Noah D.
    SCIENCE, 2012, 336 (6084) : 998 - 998
  • [48] Empowering Language Understanding with Counterfactual Reasoning
    Feng, Fuli
    Zhang, Jizhi
    He, Xiangnan
    Zhang, Hanwang
    Chua, Tat-Seng
    FINDINGS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, ACL-IJCNLP 2021, 2021, : 2226 - 2236
  • [49] A visual language for explaining probabilistic reasoning
    Erwig, Martin
    Walkingshaw, Eric
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL LANGUAGES AND COMPUTING, 2013, 24 (02): : 88 - 109
  • [50] LANGUAGE AND REASONING - STUDY OF TEMPORAL FACTORS
    EVANS, JSBT
    NEWSTEAD, SE
    COGNITION, 1977, 5 (03) : 265 - 283