MRI-TRUS fusion guided prostate biopsy - initial experience and assessment of the role of contralateral lobe systematic biopsy

被引:11
|
作者
Andras, Iulia [1 ,2 ]
Crisan, Dana [3 ,4 ]
Cata, Emanuel [1 ,2 ]
Tamas-Szora, Attila [5 ]
Caraiani, Cosmin [6 ]
Coman, Radu-Tudor [7 ]
Bungardean, Catalina [8 ]
Mirescu, Claudiu [8 ]
Coman, Ioan [1 ,2 ]
Crisan, Nicolae [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm, Urol Dept, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[2] Clin Municipal Hosp, Urol Dept, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[3] Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm, Internal Med Dept, Med Clin 5, 8 V Babes, Cluj Napoca 400012, Romania
[4] Clin Municipal Hosp, Internal Med Dept, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[5] Clin Municipal Hosp, Radiol Dept, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[6] Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm, Med Imaging Dept, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[7] Iuliu Hatieganu Univ Med & Pharm, Epidemiol Dept, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[8] Clin Municipal Hosp, Pathol Dept, Cluj Napoca, Romania
关键词
image-guided biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; RESONANCE-IMAGING MRI; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; TARGETED BIOPSY; CANCER; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; CRIBRIFORM;
D O I
10.11152/mu-1705
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Aims: To present our initial experience and results of MRI-TRUS fusion guided prostate biopsy and assess the role of contralateral lobe systematic biopsy. Material and method: A number of 119 patients with clinical or biochemical suspicion for prostate cancer (PCa) were included. All patients harbored at least one PIRADS score >= 3 lesion and underwent MRI-TRITS fusion guided biopsy, as well as a concurrent systematic biopsy. The biopsy was performed by the same operator, using a rigid registration software system. Results: The mean age of the patients was 62.2 years. The mean pre-biopsy PSA was 9.15 ng/dl. The diagnosis rate of MRI-TRUS fusion guided biopsy was 47% for overall PCa and 29.4% for clinically significant (cs) PCa. A higher PIRADS score was significantly associated with the presence of overall and csPCa. MRI-TRUS fusion guided biopsy had a higher percentage of positive biopsy cores (51% vs 29%) higher likelihood of csPCa (OR 5.36, p=0.008) and upgrading (14.8%) in comparison with systematic biopsy but missed 6.7% csPCa. The contralateral lobe :systematic biopsy could have been avoided without losing the PCa diagnosis all patients with PIRADS score 5, both in initial and repeat biopsy selling. Anterior and transitional lesions were more likely to be diagnosed only by targeted cores. Conclusion: MRI-TRUS guided prostate biopsy improves the detection of PCa, but systematic biopsy is still essential. In selected cases (PIRADS 5), contralateral lobe systematic biopsy can safely be avoided. Pre-biopsy mpMRI: might reduce the number of biopsy sessions in patients with anterior and transitional lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 44
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evolution of repeat prostate biopsy strategies incorporating transperineal and MRI-TRUS fusion techniques
    Kuru, Timur H.
    Saeb-Parsy, Kasra
    Cantiani, Andrea
    Frey, Julia
    Lombardo, Riccardo
    Serrao, Eva
    Gaziev, Gabriele
    Koo, Brendan
    Roethke, Matthias
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent
    Warren, Anne
    Doble, Andrew
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Kastner, Christof
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (04) : 945 - 950
  • [22] Multiparametric MRI and MRI/TRUS Fusion Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Kesch, Claudia
    Dieffenbacher, Svenja
    Bonekamp, David
    Hadaschik, Boris Alexander
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    MOLECULAR & DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING IN PROSTATE CANCER: CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND TREATMENT STRATEGIES, 2019, 1126 : 87 - 98
  • [23] Is it necessary for all patients with suspicious lesions undergo systematic biopsy in the era of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy?
    Lv, Zhengtong
    Wang, Jinfu
    Wang, Miao
    Hou, Huimin
    Song, Liuqi
    Li, Haodong
    Wang, Xuan
    Liu, Ming
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2023, 49 (03): : 359 - 371
  • [24] Optimal sampling scheme in men with abnormal multiparametric MRI undergoing MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy
    Freifeld, Yuval
    Xi, Yin
    Passoni, Niccolo
    Woldu, Solomon
    Hornberger, Brad
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    Raj, Ganesh
    Margulis, Vitaly
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    Lotan, Yair
    Francis, Franto
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Costa, Daniel N.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 37 (01) : 57 - 62
  • [25] Does MRI-TRUS fusion targeted prostate biopsy have better Gleason score concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy?
    Ku, M-H.
    Wei, T-C.
    Lin, T-P.
    Huang, E. Y-H.
    Chung, H-J.
    Kuo, J-Y.
    Huang, W. J.
    Chang, Y-H.
    Wang, H-K.
    Shen, S-H.
    Lin, A. T. L.
    Chen, K-K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 107 - 108
  • [26] Biojet fusion biopsy is more accurate for diagnosing prostate cancer located in transitional zone compared with RVS Biopsy via transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy
    Nagai, T.
    Naiki, T.
    Hamamoto, S.
    Chaya, R.
    Iida, K.
    Moritoki, Y.
    Etani, T.
    Taguchi, K.
    Kobayashi, D.
    Ando, R.
    Akita, H.
    Okamura, T.
    Kawai, N.
    Maruyama, T.
    Yasui, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 42 - 42
  • [27] PAIN CONTROL DURING PROSTATE MRI-TRUS FUSION SOFTWARE-BASED TARGETED BIOPSY
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Manfredi, Matteo
    De Luca, Stefano
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Amparore, Daniele
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Garrou, Diletta
    Bollito, Enrico
    Russo, Filippo
    De Pascale, Agostino
    Gned, Dario
    Cirillo, Stefano
    Fiori, Cristian
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (04) : 2099 - 2100
  • [28] Non-rigid MRI-TRUS Registration in Targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Marami, Bahram
    Sirouspour, Shahin
    Ghoul, Suha
    Abarghouei, Shadi Emami
    Sun, Yue
    Fenster, Aaron
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2015: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2015, 9413
  • [29] Perilesional Targeted Biopsy Combined with MRI-TRUS Image Fusion-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy: An Analysis According to PI-RADS Scores
    Tomioka, Masayuki
    Seike, Kensaku
    Uno, Hiromi
    Asano, Nami
    Watanabe, Haruo
    Tomioka-Inagawa, Risa
    Kawase, Makoto
    Kato, Daiki
    Takai, Manabu
    Iinuma, Koji
    Tobisawa, Yuki
    Nakane, Keita
    Tsuchiya, Kunihiro
    Ito, Takayasu
    Koie, Takuya
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (15)
  • [30] MRI-TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in obese patients: Does it reduce risk of prostate cancer upgrade on final pathology compared to systematic 12-core biopsy?
    Gold, Samuel A.
    Bloom, Jonathan
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Hale, Graham
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Sanford, Thomas
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (07)