The problem of transplanting the sensitized patient: Whose problem is it?

被引:27
|
作者
Jackson, Annette M. [1 ]
Zachary, Andrea A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Immunogenet Lab, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
关键词
transplantation; HLA; PRA; sensitization; alloantibodies; rejection; review;
D O I
10.2741/2770
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal failure and a life-saving treatment for failure of other major organs. Improvements in surgical techniques, histocompatibility testing, and immunosuppressive drugs have significantly improved both patient and graft survival (1-4). However, there are formidable barriers to the successful transplantation of patients who possess HLA-specific antibodies. Sensitized patients wait longer for a transplant and, once transplanted, experience more rejection episodes and have decreased graft survival compared to non-sensitized recipients (5-8). Improvements in HLA-specific antibody detection have expanded the donor pool available to sensitized patients (914) and desensitization protocols designed to reduce the breadth and amount of HLA-specific antibody have found increased success during the last decade (15-20). Determining the appropriate course of treatment for the sensitized patient requires accurate immunologic characterization and clinical assessment of the patient. Together, the transplant physician and histocompatibility expert must determine what constitutes a compatible donor and assess the patient's risk for a particular transplant. Thus, sensitization to HLA antigens is a problem for the patient, the transplant physician, and the histocompatibility laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:1396 / 1412
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Children: whose problem? - An editorial
    Wynne, J
    CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 27 (05) : 383 - 388
  • [22] Ageing and hemophilia: whose problem is it?
    Robinson, G.
    Schuster, J. .
    Rangarajan, S. .
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2012, 18 : 9 - 9
  • [23] WHOSE BABY IS POPULATION PROBLEM
    MILES, RE
    POPULATION BULLETIN, 1970, 26 (01) : 3 - &
  • [24] Doping in sport: Whose problem is it?
    Engelberg, Terry
    Skinner, James
    SPORT MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 19 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [25] EXCESSIVE DRINKING - WHOSE PROBLEM
    SALTER, L
    BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 40 : A66 - A66
  • [26] HCI - WHOSE PROBLEM IS IT ANYWAY
    PROCTER, RN
    WILLIAMS, RA
    IFIP TRANSACTIONS A-COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 18 : 385 - 396
  • [27] Noise: Whose problem is it anyway?
    Gupta, S
    INTERNATIONAL TEST CONFERENCE 2000, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 1113 - 1113
  • [28] HCI - WHOSE PROBLEM IS IT ANYWAY
    COCKTON, G
    HARRISON, M
    KWASNIK, B
    PENNER, R
    PROCTER, R
    BASS, L
    DIX, A
    BEAUDOUINLAFON, M
    CARLSEN, N
    UKELSON, J
    LARSON, J
    KAZMAN, R
    IFIP TRANSACTIONS A-COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 18 : 397 - 403
  • [29] Teenage pregnancy: whose problem is it?
    Jewell, D
    Tacchi, J
    Donovan, J
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2000, 17 (06) : 522 - 528
  • [30] Teenage pregnancy: whose problem is it?
    Zarzeczna-Baran, M
    Balkowska, B
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2002, 19 (02) : 211 - 211