Comparison of electrostatic charge generation in gas-solid fluidized beds in turbulent versus pre-turbulent flow regime

被引:10
|
作者
Song, Di [1 ]
Mehrani, Poupak [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Chem & Biol Engn Dept, 161 Louis Pasteur, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
Gas-solid fluidization; Electrostatics; Particle wall coating; Turbulent; DIELECTRIC PARTICLES; BEHAVIOR; VELOCITY; WALL; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.powtec.2017.07.013
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In this work, the effect of gas velocity on the electrostatic charge generation in gas-solid fluidized beds was studied with a specific focus on the transition to turbulent flow regime. Experiments were conducted at a pressure of 2600 kPa (abs) with fluidizing gas velocities of 1.5, 3, and 5 times of U-mf (pre-turbulent regimes) and 7.5 times of U-mf (turbulent regime). Increasing the gas velocity and transitioning to the turbulent flow regime improved particle-wall contacts; and thus, augmented the extent of wall fouling, which indicates the increase in bed electrostatic charge generation. The amount of fouling was approximately five times larger in turbulent flow regime (7.5 U-mf) in comparison to that for the lowest gas velocity examined in bubbling flow regime (1.5 U-mf). The particles coating on the column wall consisted of a thick bottom layer which extended to a height of approximately 1 m above the distributor plate, and a thin top layer which extended to the top of the column near the outlet. The particles net specific charge in the top and bottom layers did not vary with the increase in gas velocity. However, the net charge of these particles increased. The fine particles entrained from the bed had a net negative charge resulting in a net positive charge to be left behind in the bed contributing to the increase in the magnitude of wall fouling at higher gas velocities, especially in turbulent flow regime. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 433
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TURBULENT SWIRL WITH GAS-SOLID FLOW IN CYCLONE
    PARIDA, A
    CHAND, P
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1980, 35 (04) : 949 - 954
  • [22] Critical comparison of hydrodynamic models for gas-solid fluidized beds - Part II: freely bubbling gas-solid fluidized beds
    Patil, DJ
    Annaland, AV
    Kuipers, JAM
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2005, 60 (01) : 73 - 84
  • [23] Comparison of influence of fluidization time on electrostatic charge build-up in the bubbling vs slugging flow regimes in gas-solid fluidized beds
    Giffin, Amanda
    Mehrani, Poupak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROSTATICS, 2010, 68 (06) : 492 - 502
  • [24] Modeling charge transfer and induction in gas-solid fluidized beds
    Park, AHA
    Bi, HTT
    Grace, JR
    Chen, AH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROSTATICS, 2002, 55 (02) : 135 - 158
  • [25] Gas phase hydrodynamics of a gas-solid turbulent fluidized bed reactor
    Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    [J]. Chem Eng Sci, 5 (713-723):
  • [26] Gas phase hydrodynamics of a gas-solid turbulent fluidized bed reactor
    Foka, M
    Chaouki, J
    Guy, C
    Klvana, D
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 1996, 51 (05) : 713 - 723
  • [27] Analysis of wall fouling and electrostatic charging in gas-solid fluidized beds
    Lu, Junyu
    Fujii, Shun
    Yasuda, Masatoshi
    Matsusaka, Shuji
    [J]. ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 31 (08) : 3485 - 3491
  • [28] Effect of electrostatic charges on single bubble in gas-solid fluidized beds
    Jalalinejad, Farzaneh
    Bi, Xiaotao T.
    Grace, John R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2012, 44 : 15 - 28
  • [29] Gas-solid flow behavior and contact efficiency in a circulating-turbulent fluidized bed
    Geng, Qiang
    Zhu, Xiaolin
    Liu, Yuxiang
    Liu, Yibin
    Li, Chunyi
    You, Xinghua
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 245 : 134 - 145
  • [30] Decoupling electrostatic signals from gas-solid bubbling fluidized beds
    He, Chuan
    Bi, Xiaotao T.
    Grace, John R.
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 290 : 11 - 20