Role of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in patients with suspected prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Tingting [1 ]
Yang, Shuye [1 ]
Lin, Lili [1 ]
Wang, Shuo [2 ]
Xia, Dan [2 ]
Chen, Donghe [1 ]
Wang, Guolin [1 ]
Zhao, Kui [1 ]
Su, Xinhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, PET Ctr, Dept Nucl Med,Affiliated Hosp 1, 79 Qingchun Rd, Hangzhou 310003, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol Surg, Hangzhou 310003, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Suspected prostate cancer; F-18-DCFPyL; PET/CT; Diagnosis; Staging; MEMBRANE ANTIGEN; PSA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Fluorine-18-2-(3-{1-carboxy-54(6-18F-flfluoro-pyridine-3-ca rbonyl)-amino]-pentyl}-ureido)-pentanedioic acid (F-18-DCFPyL), a novel positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) radiotracer that binds to the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), is increasingly used for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer diagnostics. However, the F-18-DCFPyL characteristics of suspected prostate cancer (SPCa) have been even more rarely described. Herein, in this retrospective study, we describe the clinical impact of F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging in SPCa. Subjects and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 56 SPCa patients who had undergone F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT studies. These patients were done for primary diagnosis/staging. Positron emission tomography/CT images were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively (maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and maximum SUV normalized by lean body mass (SULmax)). Histopathologic diagnosis was taken as reference standard. The optimal cut-off of F-18-DCFPyL was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Results: All the patients were confirmed by histopathological examination via prostatectomy or prostate biopsy. Fluorine-18-DCFPyL PET/CT showed higher radiotracer uptake in prostate cancer than that in non-prostate cancer. When SUVmax 5.0 and SULmax 4.0 were cut-off points for determining prostate cancer, the sensitivity of F-18-DCFPyL was 90%, specificity was 100%, and accuracy was 91.2%. Furthermore, there were highly significant positive correlations between SUVmax, SULmax and serum PSA. On comparison of areas under the curve, no significant difference was seen between SUVmax and SULmax in the sensitivity and specificity of F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT for PCa identification. However, delayed PET/CT did not improved accuracy in the term of uncertain PCa in the initial standard imaging. As for lymph node staging, the negative predictive value of F-18-DCFPyL PET/CT was 100%. Conclusion: Fluorine-18-DCFPyL PET/CT is a promising imaging modality for initial diagnosis and preoperative N staging in SPCa.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 18
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Equivocal findings on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT for Metastatic or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Novello, M.
    Cengiz, T.
    Trak, J.
    Ghesani, M.
    Gavane, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (SUPPL 1) : S499 - S499
  • [32] A Prospective Study on 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT Imaging in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer
    Rousseau, Etienne
    Wilson, Don
    Lacroix-Poisson, Frederic
    Krauze, Andra
    Chi, Kim
    Gleave, Martin
    McKenzie, Michael
    Tyldesley, Scott
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Benard, Francxois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 60 (11) : 1587 - 1593
  • [33] Predictors of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT Positivity in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Local Therapy
    Mena, Esther
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Lindenberg, Liza
    Turkbey, Baris
    Fourquet, Aloyse
    Lin, Frank I.
    Adler, Stephen
    Eclarinal, Philip
    McKinney, Yolanda L.
    Citrin, Deborah E.
    Dahut, William
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Chang, Richard
    Levy, Elliot
    Merino, Maria
    Gorin, Michael A.
    Pomper, Martin G.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Eary, Janet F.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Pienta, Kenneth J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 63 (08) : 1184 - 1190
  • [34] Primary Peripheral Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor of the Prostate on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT
    Liu, Yachao
    Xu, Baixuan
    [J]. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 45 (05) : E249 - E251
  • [35] Cylindroma, an uncommon presentation on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT
    B. P. F. Koene
    Y. J. L. Bodar
    D. Meijer
    E. H. Jaspars
    A. N. Vis
    D. E. Oprea-Lager
    [J]. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2021, 48 : 927 - 928
  • [36] Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Prostate on 18F-DCFPyL and 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Li, Edward
    Russon, Andrew
    Chen, Jeffrey
    Mansberg, Victor
    Mansberg, Robert
    [J]. CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 49 (04) : 335 - 337
  • [37] Histologic Validation of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT with Comparison to Multiparametric MRI in Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Zukotynski, Katherine A.
    Rowe, Steven P.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2020, 296 (03) : 573 - 574
  • [38] Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with 18F-DCFPyL PET/multiparametric MR
    Ur Metser
    Claudia Ortega
    Nathan Perlis
    Eli Lechtman
    Alejandro Berlin
    Reut Anconina
    Yael Eshet
    Rosanna Chan
    Patrick Veit-Haibach
    Theodorus H. van der Kwast
    Amy Liu
    Sangeet Ghai
    [J]. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2021, 48 : 3702 - 3711
  • [39] Effect of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT on the Management of Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Registry Trial
    Metser, Ur
    Zukotynski, Katherine
    Mak, Victor
    Langer, Deanna
    MacCrostie, Pamela
    Finelli, Antonio
    Kapoor, Anil
    Chin, Joseph
    Lavallee, Luke
    Klotz, Laurence H.
    Hagerty, Marlon
    Hildebrand, Catherine
    Bauman, Glenn
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2022, 303 (02)
  • [40] Effect of body weight on standardized uptake values on 18F-DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer.
    Parihar, Ashwin Singh
    Schmidt, Lisa R.
    Crandall, John
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Siegel, Barry A.
    Wahl, Richard L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41