Environmental Impact of a Mass Timber Building-A Case Study

被引:8
|
作者
Vanova, Rozalia [1 ]
Stompf, Patrik [1 ]
Stefko, Jozef [1 ]
Stefkova, Jaroslava [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Zvolen, Fac Wood Sci & Technol, Dept Wood Struct, Zvolen 96001, Slovakia
[2] Tech Univ Zvolen, Inst Foreign Languages, Zvolen 96001, Slovakia
来源
FORESTS | 2021年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
mass timber; construction materials; life cycle assessment; environmental impact; sustainability; embodied impact; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LAMINATED TIMBER; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/f12111571
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The study focuses on a life cycle assessment of a wood-based residential building and evaluates the magnitude of individual construction components-foundations, flooring, peripheral wall, inner walls, ceiling, roof, windows, and doors-in terms of climate change; acidification; eutrophication; photochemical oxidation; depletion of abiotic elements and fossil fuels; and water scarcity categories within the system boundaries of the Product stage of the life cycle. The assessment was done using the SimaPro software and the ecoinvent database. The results pointed at the advantages of mass timber as a construction material and highlighted the significance in the type of insulation used. Foundations were found to bear the highest share of impact on photochemical oxidation reaching nearly 30% and depletion of fossil fuels accounting for about 25% of that impact. Peripheral wall was ranked the worst in terms of impact on acidification and eutrophication (more than 25% of both), depletion of elements (responsible for 50% of that impact), and had about 60% impact on water scarcity. After adding up carbon emissions and removals, the embodied impact of the whole construction on climate change was detected to be 8185.19 kg CO2 eq emissions which corresponded with 57.08 kg CO2 eq/m(2) of gross internal area. A negative carbon composition of the construction was also set.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of thermal mass on building energy consumption: A case study in Al Mafraq city in Jordan
    Sharaf, Firas
    COGENT ENGINEERING, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [42] A Case Study Comparing the Fire Risk in a Building of Non-combustible Frame and a Timber Frame Building
    Karlsson, Bjorn
    Gudnadottir, Iris
    Tomasson, Bodvar
    WOOD & FIRE SAFETY, WFS 2020, 2020, : 226 - 231
  • [43] A framework for assessing the environmental benefits of mass timber construction
    Crawford, Robert H.
    Cadorel, Xavier
    CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 2017, CCC 2017, 2017, 196 : 838 - 846
  • [44] Environmental labelling of timber-framed dwellings and their building components
    Stehn, L
    BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2002, 30 (04): : 248 - 254
  • [45] Sustainability impact assessment of glue laminated timber and concrete-based building materials production chains - A Lithuanian case study
    Zemaitis, Povilas
    Linkevicius, Edgaras
    Aleinikovas, Marius
    Tuomasjukka, Diana
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 321
  • [46] Environmental and economic evaluations of building energy retrofits: Case study of a commercial building
    Zheng, Linzi
    Lai, Joseph
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 145 : 14 - 23
  • [47] Impact of Prescriptive Fire Design Provisions on Embodied Carbon for Mass Timber and Hybrid Mass Timber Floors
    Leonard, Samantha
    Parfitt, Kevin
    Solnosky, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 30 (03)
  • [48] A study on environmental impact of insulation thickness of poultry building walls
    Kucuktopcu, Erdem
    Cemek, Bilal
    ENERGY, 2018, 150 : 583 - 590
  • [49] Environmental Impacts of Building Construction Using Cross-laminated Timber Panel Construction Method: A Case of the Research Building in Kyushu, Japan
    Nakano, Katsuyuki
    Karube, Masahiko
    Hattori, Nobuaki
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (06) : 1 - 14
  • [50] Economic and environmental life cycle assessment of alternative mass timber walls to evaluate circular economy in building: MCDM method
    Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard
    Sher, Willy
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (01) : 239 - 268