Hands-on or no hands-on training in ultrasound imaging: A randomized trial to evaluate learning outcomes and speed of recall of topographic anatomy

被引:32
|
作者
Knudsen, Lars [1 ]
Nawrotzki, Ralph [2 ]
Schmiedl, Andreas [1 ]
Muehlfeld, Christian [1 ]
Kruschinski, Carsten [3 ]
Ochs, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Funct & Appl Anat, Hannover, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Anat & Cell Biol, Dept Med Cell Biol, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Gen Practice, Hannover, Germany
关键词
gross anatomy education; medical education; ultrasound education; topographic anatomy; cross-sectional anatomy; non-analytical reasoning; pattern recognition; TEACHING SECTIONAL ANATOMY; VISUAL-SPATIAL ABILITY; GROSS-ANATOMY; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; MUSCULOSKELETAL ULTRASOUND; CARDIAC ANATOMY; DECISION-MAKING; EDUCATION; INTEGRATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1002/ase.1792
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Medical students have difficulties in interpreting two-dimensional (2D) topographic anatomy on sectional images. Hands-on and no hands-on training in ultrasound imaging facilitate learning topographic anatomy. Hands-on training is linked with active search for patterns of anatomical structures and might train pattern recognition for image interpretation better although the added value on learning outcomes is unclear. This study explores first year medical students' knowledge in topographic anatomy of the upper abdomen after attending hands-on or no hands-on training in ultrasound in a randomized trial. While students in the hands-on ultrasound group (N = 21) generated and interpreted standardized planes of ultrasound imaging, students in the no hands-on seminar group (N = 22) interpreted provided ultrasound images by correlation to three-dimensional (3D) anatomical prosections. Afterwards knowledge in topographic anatomy was measured repetitively by text and ultrasound image-based multiple choice (MC) examinations. As surrogate for pattern recognition, students rated whether answers were known after reflection or instantly. While intrinsic motivation was higher in the ultrasound group, no differences in the MC-examination score were found between ultrasound and seminar group instantly (66.5 +/- 10.9% vs. 64.5% +/- 11.0%, P = 0.551) or six weeks (62.9% +/- 12.3% vs. 61.5% +/- 11.0%, P = 0.718) after training. In both groups scores in text-based questions declined (P < 0.001) while scores in image-based questions remained stable (P = 0.895) with time. After six weeks more image-based questions were instantly known in the hands-on ultrasound compared to seminar-group (28% +/- 17.3% vs. 16% +/- 13.5%, P = 0.047). Hands-on ultrasound-training is linked with faster interpreting of ultrasound images without loss in accuracy. The added value of hands-on training might be facilitation of pattern recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 591
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does the hands-on, technical training of residents in colonoscopy affect quality outcomes?
    David Pace
    Mark Borgaonkar
    Nikita Hickey
    Brad Evans
    Muna Lougheed
    Curtis Marcoux
    Jerry McGrath
    Darrell Boone
    Meghan O’Leary
    Chris Smith
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 1352 - 1355
  • [22] RAPID-CYCLE DELIBERATE PRACTICE FOR TRAINING OF HANDS-ON CPR SKILLS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Bhalala, Utpal
    Velasquez, Steven
    Thangavelu, Malarvizhi
    Wats, Anchal
    McElroy, James
    Whitt, Dottie
    Doerr, Donna
    Petrescu, Matei
    Patel, Abhishek
    Appachi, Elumalai
    Kumar, Shelley
    Thammasitboon, Satid
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47
  • [23] Can a "hands-on" animal course help in learning endoscopic ultrasound.
    Bhutani, M
    Hoffman, B
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (04) : AB179 - AB179
  • [24] Does the hands-on, technical training of residents in colonoscopy affect quality outcomes?
    Pace, David
    Borgaonkar, Mark
    Hickey, Nikita
    Evans, Brad
    Lougheed, Muna
    Marcoux, Curtis
    McGrath, Jerry
    Boone, Darrell
    O'Leary, Meghan
    Smith, Chris
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (04): : 1352 - 1355
  • [25] Vicarious learning during simulations: is it more effective than hands-on training?
    Stegmann, Karsten
    Pilz, Florian
    Siebeck, Matthias
    Fischer, Frank
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (10) : 1001 - 1008
  • [26] Enhancement in virtual learning cannot substitute for hands-on training in cardiothoracic surgery
    Villamizar, Nestor
    Nguyen, Dao M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (12) : 3449 - 3450
  • [27] Introducing Novice Operators to Collaborative Robots: A Hands-On Approach for Learning and Training
    Hansen, Andreas Kornmaaler
    Villani, Valeria
    Pupa, Andrea
    Lassen, Astrid Heidemann
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, : 1 - 14
  • [28] Multi-stage learning aids applied to hands-on software training
    Rother, Kristian
    Rother, Magdalena
    Pleus, Alexandra
    Belzen, Annette Upmeier Zu
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 11 (06) : 582 - 586
  • [29] Teaching With Dogs: Learning About Learning Through Hands-on Experience in Dog Training
    McConnell, Bridget L.
    PSYCHOLOGY LEARNING AND TEACHING-PLAT, 2016, 15 (03): : 310 - 328
  • [30] Evaluating Learning Outcomes by Applying Interdisciplinary Hands-On Learning to Advanced Technology Courses
    Hui-Tzu Chang
    Hsien-Hua Wu
    Yi-Ting Chang
    Innovative Higher Education, 2023, 48 : 619 - 636